AMD Radeon R9 Nano Core Configuration Leak
Click here to post a comment for AMD Radeon R9 Nano Core Configuration Leak on our message forum
rl66
despite i am not too much AMD, i must agree that this card is sexy.
i hope that the price will be as sexy.
Elder III
2 days to go until your review Hilbert? I'm curious how a pair of these would compare to my current R9 295x2...
AMDFreeSync
Link dead
zer0_c0ol
https://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/2433/7896/original.jpg
i apologize for the size, pls don't bash me
AMDFreeSync
http://img.pandawhale.com/90857-mother-of-meat-god-gif-G6Xx.gif
Update:
http://i.imgur.com/stfHA22.png
shymi
I hope this little one will bring some much needed customers to AMD. Go, go, Red Team! We need competition on the market 🙂
tsunami231
I like the performance/watt it has
CalculuS
I'm excited to see what the price is going to be about this. Its either gonna be priced amazingly or awful.
icedman
I don't think I elieve the specs in the link it shows the the nano with the same specs as the fury x only it's about 100w less either it's fake or am has done something amazing at the fab level of the chip.
Isbre
They have actually confirmed the specs too. wow. Probably more lies again. I really hope for all our sakes they are not doing just that. Sorry but I'm not very optimistic anymore when it comes to AMD promises.
But then again, that will have to be not far from the truth. That little cooler cant handle much more really.
Humanoid_1
I reckon like Hilbert mentions, this card will be Thermal Throttling Champ!
Not a bad thing mind as it will push out best possible performance for this form factor
...and will possibly be The one to buy to watercool with its reduced price.
Now, have voltage tweaks been freed up yet I am left wondering...? (have not been following this issue for a while.)
I Still want to see these cards be an that Amazing Overclockers Dream AMD were talking about just before launch!
xIcarus
So full stream processors, full frequencies but almost half the TDP?
That reads like fiction. You have to castrate the card somehow, you're not shaving 100W off just by giving it a smaller PCB.
Or maybe the waterblock needs 100W ololol /s.
theoneofgod
The Fury X has a small PCB. The Fury too.
AMDFreeSync
AMD Radeon R9 Nano officially destroy 390, 390x & Fury.
http://forums.guru3d.com/showpost.php?p=5147859&postcount=45
WareTernal
*AMD MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES WITH RESPECT TO THE CONTENTS HEREOF AND ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITES FOR ANY INNACCURACIES OR OMISSIONS THAT MAY APPEAR IN THIS INFORMATION.
*AMD RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REVISE THIS INFORMATION AND TO MAKE CHANGES FROM TIME TO TIME TO THE CONTENT HEREOF WITHOUT OBLIGATION OF AMD TO NOTIFY ANY PERSON OF SUCH REVISIONS OR CHANGES.
Sooo.....Waiting for real world tests....Common sense dictates that this thing ins't going to equal the fury, unless it is priced the same or more.
Humanoid_1
Yup, it's going have a hard time keeping up with Fury while missing a power connector...
I was having some fanciful thoughts until my memory kicked back in 🙂
Elder III
Some powerful voodoo or Jedi mind tricks? I can't see how it's going to be as powerful as a FuryX with only 175 watts TDP on the same architecture.... Maybe I'm just missing something?
Kaarme
The last slide was comparing it to GTX 970 ITX. That would be a lot nicer comparison if the prices were somewhat close, but I foresee Nano costing a whole lot more.
mitzi76
Performance per watt is a bit of a meaningless statistic no?
I.e Who cares?
But I do like small cards that pack a punch.
cyclone3d
I also don't see how it can have the same specs as the FuryX and use 100w less.
Unless it is actually being made on a smaller process.
