AMD Radeon Anti-Lag+ Back In The Pipeline
Click here to post a comment for AMD Radeon Anti-Lag+ Back In The Pipeline on our message forum
RealNC
AuerX
https://darkreader.org/
I use Darkreader, and it looks ok with that.
aufkrawall2
Funny thing is that better scaling by FSR 3 FG does not only look smoother, but it also means it adds less latency than DLSS 3 FG, as worse scaling means higher frame time of one "real" frame that's "buffered" for FG:
-> DLSS FG almost (or even more, as frame times vary more with DLSS 3 FG than with FSR 3 FG on RDNA3 with HAGS) adds 30% more input lag than FSR 3 FG...
Of course, something like Reflex can shave off more than this, so AMD indeed needs to come up with a similar thing. Regular Anti-Lag works poorly with FSR 3 FG (stutter), so let's hope this will be better. Probably not easy to achieve, so I wouldn't be surprised if the first attempt doesn't turn out to be gold.
Krakkan
I loved Anti-lag+ it made a huge difference on a 4K 60Hz monitor, made it feel like 120Hz. I really hope it comes back and is equally as good as the first version because that was a really noticeable difference!
nizzen
Krakkan
RealNC
wavetrex
I can definitely feel when my TV accidentally switches from 120 back to 60 (happens sometime when I use it as a TV instead of as a monitor). Everything feels a bit "sluggish", starting with moving a window around and of course, games.
And it's an LG OLED with extremely low input latency and instant pixel response time. Even at 60 it's pretty good.
A few weeks ago I tried playing something on an old Dell LCD (only 60hz, big input latency and slow response) at somebody's place, and it was absolutely horrible, like my brain was disconnected from my hand, misclicking things 80% of the time). How can people play console games at 30 fps on TVs that are not even set in gaming mode (huge processing latency), is completely beyond me.
user1
nizzen