AMD FX-9590 gets big price cut in UK
Click here to post a comment for AMD FX-9590 gets big price cut in UK on our message forum
NAMEk
Still too much ;D
Koniakki
You are bad! π
bucknuts21
In what world did AMD really think people were going to spend that much for a factory OC'd FX-8350 in the first place, and as NAMEk said, it still cost to much.
---TK---
I will Alert the 3 people that paid full price personally
NAMEk
I get this often =)
bobdude
i am a amd fanboy wont deny it but sadly your right lol
Glumac 011
@ tortojed
Tortojed pusi karu.
AMD te jebe u bulju π
Koniakki
Guys at about what price would you consider, reasonable? And please since that word is mentioned already, be also reasonable.. :P
My guess would be around β¬220-250, Β£200-220, $260-280.
So, what do you guys think?
bucknuts21
To be honest I wouldn't pay more than $300 for it, and even for that price a i7-4770K is not much more.
StewieTech
The sad thing is, that was a massive cut, but itΒ΄s still too expensive. That says a lot.
NAMEk
English please ^.
Pill Monster
He said AMD can suck it.
Undying
He said something worse than that. π
Chillin
*Opens up Google Translate*
Oh my!
alanm
They're just doing what Intel used to do with EE chips. The $999 i7-965 was no more than a slightly OC'd i7-920. Fortunately Intel stopped doing that and now offer moar cores on their EE chips.
Pill Monster
Yeah I was trying to be polite. lol
Ako te pojebem u guzicu majki Γ¦eΕ‘ na grobu govoriti kako ti je lepo bilo Jebo ti konj AMD trudnu sestru na majcinom grobu dok ti otac retardiran gleda iz invalidskihkolica.
Mica
This CPU reminds me the Intel bad days, like the days of the Pentium 4/D processors. They wanted the GHz so bad when AMD made better chips with less GHz, now it's completely the opposite. And why in this world they can't move to a smaller fabrication process? 32nm is so ancient. AMD graphics card is 28nm since january 2012, please...
hmanlow
shut up and take my money... LOL :wanker:
Noufel
in an alternative future " AMD will soon release their 20 nm PHENOM III X8 code name spartan with 8 independent cores non modules 3.9 ghz 4.2 turbo 100 watt tdp along with the new AM4 chipset quad chanel DDR4 , 3x PCe 3.0 (16x,16x,16x) .........."
but no, they relesed the 9590 always on the 32 nm manufacture with 3000 watt tdp crap on the same price level of an 3960x 12 threads intel cpu and worse higher than an 3930k ............
AMD graphics are the top but for the cpu part they are 2 years late, hope 2014'll be beter for you AMD an your fans including me.
The Vicar
On paper this cpu looks impressive, but 220w power consumption is a little high, It will cost more in the long run on energy bills, so in my oppinion not the best of cpu to buy.
