AMD FSR 2.1 support to be added to Cyberpunk 2077.

Published by

Click here to post a comment for AMD FSR 2.1 support to be added to Cyberpunk 2077. on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/250/250667.jpg
Updating now !
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56004.jpg
I don't play the game, but I'm updating it now nonetheless.
data/avatar/default/avatar08.webp
Why not FSR 2.2 at this point?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/256/256969.jpg
Still no news on DLSS 3.0/Frame generation for CP2077 ? It' been shown at length but isn't available yet ?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/250/250667.jpg
HARDRESET:

Updating now !
Hummmm , nothing earth shattering .
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/132/132389.jpg
It's pretty sad that the game is still nowhere near what was promised. I bet interacting with the world still feels dead and empty because of how bare-bones the NPC reactions are. And now I hear CDPR are allowing the original Witcher game to be remade "for a modern audience" aka stripping it of all personality, giving it a lobotomy, and sterilizing it to be woke. I hope it's not true.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/250/250418.jpg
Still waiting for gold so I can enjoy the game, when it's ready! XD
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/218/218363.jpg
Looks great, definitely on par with DLSS.
XenthorX:

Still no news on DLSS 3.0/Frame generation for CP2077 ? It' been shown at length but isn't available yet ?
I play this game at 3440x1440 and it's unfortunately severely CPU bound 😏Not sure if DLSS 3.0 would help, although I hope it would.
data/avatar/default/avatar31.webp
Silva:

Still waiting for gold so I can enjoy the game, when it's ready! XD
The best CDPR can do is bronze, maybe...
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115462.jpg
Neo Cyrus:

It's pretty sad that the game is still nowhere near what was promised. I bet interacting with the world still feels dead and empty because of how bare-bones the NPC reactions are. And now I hear CDPR are allowing the original Witcher game to be remade "for a modern audience" aka stripping it of all personality, giving it a lobotomy, and sterilizing it to be woke. I hope it's not true.
A thing I noticed in my most recent playtrough is that the pedestrians have absolutely 0 reaction to car horns (after remembering that there actually is a key for it...) when trying to not run them over. So I really don't get what the point of your vehicle horn is, since apparently V is the only one hearing it, lol.
data/avatar/default/avatar07.webp
Netherwind:

Looks great, definitely on par with DLSS. I play this game at 3440x1440 and it's unfortunately severely CPU bound 😏Not sure if DLSS 3.0 would help, although I hope it would.
What settings are you using? I am super GPU bound. 6900xt at 2560x1440p high, around 80-100 FPS. Upgrading from a 1700 to a 5800x gave me 0-10 fps at same settings.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Netherwind:

I play this game at 3440x1440 and it's unfortunately severely CPU bound 😏Not sure if DLSS 3.0 would help, although I hope it would.
It definitely would. Im interested in seeing more benchmarks with dlss3 and cpu bottleneck. From what i've seen it should alleviate most of it.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216636.jpg
Question for those with modern consoles "Added support for AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.1 (PC and next-gen consoles only)." this means is activated by default or optional on consoles?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/295/295204.jpg
CPU: 9900K @5000 RAM: DDR4 16Gb 4400 161616. GPU: 3080 @2.0+/21Gbps. 2560x1440 native, Preset: RT medium (min-avg-max): 44-53-66 fps 1440 FSR 2.1 quality, RT medium (min-avg-max): 56-71-97 fps 1440 DLSS quality, RT medium (min-avg-max): 54-72-93 fps And FPS killer: Screen Space Reflections Quality: Ultra > Low ... 1440 FSR 2.1 quality, RT medium (min-avg-max): 54-87-111 fps Only 1 run /benchmark.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/262/262995.jpg
So it has indeed been added. "To be added" points to it coming in the future.
data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp
Any picture analysis to see how much details were loss or regained?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196426.jpg
Just tried on my GTX 1080 with 3440x1440 display resolution (The monitor goes up to 100 fps): Benchmark results for presets (RT off, obviously): High: 41 fps (completely unplayable, no idea how console players can play stuff at 30 fps, that is just ridiculous!) Medium: ~52 fps (somewhat playable, but the frame dips and mouse lag are quite noticeable resulting in a poor experience) Low: ~65 fps (smooth enough, but looks like crap) (All these are with FSR 2.1 on, without it it's a complete stutterfest at anything higher than Low, which is in the 30's) Let's just say that I will wait a while longer before I play this game. No amount of software tricks will make this game be playable on my outdated GPU at native monitor resolution.
data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp
You GTX 1080 is a good GPU my friend, the game not. A good optimized game is still completely playable with a GPU like yours.