AMD Announces Radeon R9 Fury Graphics Card

Published by

Click here to post a comment for AMD Announces Radeon R9 Fury Graphics Card on our message forum
#5119330
data/avatar/default/avatar37.webp
Hmm Makes me wonder why AMD only stuck with 2 partners with the non fury X cards? To me this is kind of weird.
#5119333
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Hmm Makes me wonder why AMD only stuck with 2 partners with the non fury X cards? To me this is kind of weird.
It wasn't AMD's call. It is the board partners that made the decision to make them or not.
#5119337
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/260/260855.jpg
It wasn't AMD's call. It is the board partners that made the decision to make them or not.
Not to be rude, but isn't that a sign that something has gone terribly wrong?
#5119338
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/224/224564.jpg
The Fury will probably be the "value" card that people are looking for (until the Nano comes out), at least compared to the overpriced Fury X. The Fury has -50mhz on the core clock and missing some shader processers, but besides that it's the same as the Fury X (at least from what I saw). And -$100. If it's within 2-3FPS of the Fury X, then it should act like AMD's 980TI, where it's basically the same performance for less money. If it's too much worse then the Fury X, or runs at 94c, then it will be another flub. Hopefully AMD get this one right.
Not to be rude, but isn't that a sign that something has gone terribly wrong?
Dunno, but maybe it has something to do with the low yields of HBM? AMD's bringing out the Fury in a week or something, aren't they? Even though they're having yield problems with the Fury X being sold out because of HBM.
#5119339
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
Hilbert, do you know what the TDP of this card is? I'm kinda curious to know how much that WC on the X effects the leakage. I've heard estimates as high as 30w.
#5119347
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
275W (similar) as listed in the included specs image.
#5119349
data/avatar/default/avatar38.webp
It wasn't AMD's call. It is the board partners that made the decision to make them or not.
Oh Ok that makes sense. Thinks for the info boss.
#5119362
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
275W (similar) as listed in the included specs image.
The pictures at the bottom don't load for me =( -- I've been having a bunch of problems with the latest Win10 build & Chrome. Anyway I find it interesting that the WCing on the Fury X effected the TDP so much.
#5119365
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/124/124168.jpg
Seems like an oc 980 can catch this card. Wonder how a 980 at 1500 would fare with an oc fury?
#5119368
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Hilbert regarding the no reviews part is seems Anandtech has a review of both cards already up... If there´s a problem with the fact i linked the review page, just remove it please.
Yep, there is much confusion regarding the embargo's, Seems like AMD doesn't give a crap anymore. Anyway, our sample won't be in until Monday.
#5119371
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/55/55855.jpg
Loads of reviews out, X is redundant now, this is the one to get get.
#5119372
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216349.jpg
Yep, there is much confusion regarding the embargo's, Seems like AMD doesn't give a crap anymore. Anyway, our sample won't be in until Monday.
They guys at Anadtech wrote that the cards are only to go on sale on the 14th but that the embargo is lifted today. Maybe that´s the reason this happened, somebody must have confused the dates...
#5119379
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/186/186805.jpg
Loads of reviews out, X is redundant now, this is the one to get get.
Yep just glanced at the review on Anandtech and seriously what the hell is going on here? The Fury is only like 2-4fps slower in games like BF4, Crysis 3, and FC4!??? This makes no sense, the Fury X has 4096 stream processors, higher ROP's, Higher texture units, higher clock speed, basically higher everything (yes some are only slightly higher). The Fury X should on paper be at least 10fps more in almost every game but it simply isn't. Could this be driver related? API related? Will DX12 really make these cards shine?
#5119381
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
Yep just glanced at the review on Anandtech and seriously what the hell is going on here? The Fury is only like 2-4fps slower in games like BF4, Crysis 3, and FC4!??? This makes no sense, the Fury X has 4096 stream processors, higher ROP's, Higher texture units, higher clock speed, basically higher everything (yes some are only slightly higher). The Fury X should on paper be at least 10fps more in almost every game but it simply isn't. Could this be driver related? API related? Will DX12 really make these cards shine?
The ROPs are the same and most people believe that the Fury X is held back by the ROP count. This basically just reinforces that. Also it only has 13% more shaders.
#5119383
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216349.jpg
Just read the review of Anandtech and it seems AMD has a winner with this card. And the card from Sapphire seems amazing!
#5119401
data/avatar/default/avatar37.webp
Yep just glanced at the review on Anandtech and seriously what the hell is going on here? The Fury is only like 2-4fps slower in games like BF4, Crysis 3, and FC4!??? This makes no sense, the Fury X has 4096 stream processors, higher ROP's, Higher texture units, higher clock speed, basically higher everything (yes some are only slightly higher). The Fury X should on paper be at least 10fps more in almost every game but it simply isn't. Could this be driver related? API related? Will DX12 really make these cards shine?
It's pointless to talk about differences in absolute FPS. What is the original framerate for the Fury X? Percentages make total sense. The Fury X won't be faster in 10FPS if the game in question is running at 20FPS on the Fury, for example... And no game in the benchmark runs the same as the other, so what's the point of absolute differences?
#5119418
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/55/55855.jpg
Even makes the 390s redundant as well, as supposedly going to be around £400/£450 here in the UK, im thinking about cancelling my X order, and just grabbing a one of these instead, was only going for the X for the AIO cooler, and its cracking temps. :P
#5119428
data/avatar/default/avatar34.webp
not bad Amd, not bad at all. With this you may very well look like the bang for buck king once again in the high performance bracket. But alas, I'm still going full steam with my purchase of the Ti Hof
#5119467
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/263/263667.jpg
Why does the Fury X even exist? Seems redundant....kinda like the Titan X / 980ti...except the Titan X has double the ram. Anyhow I will say that if I was building my comp today, it would be a tough call between my 980ti and this card....

Next Page