AMD announces Division 2 partnership
Click here to post a comment for AMD announces Division 2 partnership on our message forum
Fox2232
Incredible new experiences. I remember Division 1 tech demos with great lighting, shadows, physics.
Then game came out and it looked dull, you could shoot bus stop made of glass all day, and no broken glass... All the downgrades which made it look like 2001's Game.
I hope that Division 2 with all those new experiences will deliver at least that what Division 1 promised. Otherwise no buy for me again.
Edit: I take it back, you could break glass in HL1. And do lot more in Red Faction.
Alienwarez567
Fox2232
Alienwarez567
Well damage to cars were better than in most games, it was never meant to have super destructable items like BF or other games.
Snow was very nicely made and foot prints etc. worked again better than most games i have seen. when you crouch near a car and push the door snow will fall of etc.
Glass destruction worked fine but standing still just shooting one piece of glass to prove a point means very little to the overall experience.
Overall i have very little to complain about, have i seen better looking games YES, was it as good looking as the E3 trailer Hell no. But the overall GFX of the games were some of the better i have seen.
Mineria
Fox2232
AsiJu
Fox2232
Mineria
-Tj-
Ricepudding
AcidSnow
The Division is a great game, it's fun as hell to jump into again every few months. So gorgeous, so smooth...
AsiJu
Fox2232
Ignotum
sammarbella
No wonder these two partnered:
- Buggysoft : Expert on the fine art of false advertisement (CGI run on uber PC) and massive downgrade on release.As know "PC lover", the downgrade on PC is ON PURPOSE.(Watch Dogs "optimized PC version graphics" and dev comments in code...)
- AMD GPU: Expert on marketing stunts like useless blind monitor tests to hide real GPU performance and funny slides like the 2 polaris=1 1080.
Expect the worst from The Division 2: impressive graphic downgrade and performance deception.
__hollywood|meo
guys, idk why youre even trying to debate fox here :P all he said was that he doesnt want ubisoft to show a flashy dramatic trailer with advanced technical effects in order to build hype, then strip away every single effect that made their video footage so impressive in the first place - which they certainly did in the division. guess wat? they did it for rainbow six siege as well...they absolutely kneecapped the lighting, shadow system, & even replaced fortification models with simple & visually unimpressive versions that were completely different.
is siege a bad looking game? not at all! is it disingenuous to sell the atmosphere of a game & then purposely alter it on release? yes, it is. its frustrating & quite frankly stupid to encourage the practice by tacit acceptance - its akin to doctoring screenshots, but worse...& acting dismissive about it will only serve to further encourage publishers to do it in the future.
i was interested in the division & had friends who played it a fair bit. the buggy launch, visual downgrades, & meandering endgame was offputting, so i never bought it. the devs put a lot of work into the game since then, & it has improved in its gameplay & stability quite a bit, i hear. like fox, i too am interested in buying the division 2...but only if ubisoft learned their lesson from the first one. otherwise, ill pass as well.
more on-topic, it is good to hear support for RPM & other team red specific optimizations. we will have to wait until launch to learn the extent of their effectiveness, but im keeping tabs on their techniques out of interest...hope they release specific details later. i enjoy reading white papers
Fox2232
bigfutus
fOrTy_7