Alleged GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Specs Leak

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Alleged GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Specs Leak on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258664.jpg
I understand that with the 4080-12G they "had to" rename it to the 4070Ti due to it's lower core count on the GPU. But why are we seeing a 4060Ti right now? Before we see a 4070 or 4060 base? Why not release those and later on, once yields are getting better, refresh mid cycle with an improved 4060 GPU? I don't know, but I have the feeling that Nvidia not only abondoned it's predictable classification of GPUs since Turing, but also makes it impossible for anybody not reading specs to make a proper decision. It used to be Titan / 80Ti / 80 / 70 / 60 / 50... now it's 90Ti (alleged) / 90 / 80 / 70Ti / 70 / 60Ti / 60 / and the unsellable 50 and maybe 50Ti at probably 400 / 450 $ MSRP... I'm finally realizing that it only gets more bothersome if GPUs with different core counts are effectively named the same.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248994.jpg
I'm not sure I'm going to believe those specs. They look quite pitiful, to be honest. Half the memory bus width compareed to 3060 Ti. Still the same amount of memory, meaning the chips were switched to ones with double the capacity, but the number, and thus bus width, halved. That would certainly save big bucks for Nvidia and the partners, yet the card price would still be higher, no doubt. The GPU itself would be relatively smaller with less shaders, according to those specs. The only thing it would have going for it, aside from the newer architecture, would be higher clocks. Higher clocks are free performance for the manufacturer, compared to everything else. I really hope those specs aren't true, or they indeed are for the mobile chip, which would explain everything. Edit: Mixed bandwidth and bus width.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/230/230258.jpg
Hope it is priced below 700$ Finally a low-mid range card below 700$ Thanks NVIDIA
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
no thanks
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/108/108389.jpg
Just buy 3070 now LOL
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/268/268248.jpg
128-bit interface <------wtf..... I hope this is not true
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/227/227994.jpg
8GB is a pass for me, it's gonna be either the 4070 Ti or a 4070 if that has 12GB as well. I plan on keeping it atleast 5 years so 8GB won't cut it.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216349.jpg
fantaskarsef:

I understand that with the 4080-12G they "had to" rename it to the 4070Ti due to it's lower core count on the GPU. But why are we seeing a 4060Ti right now? Before we see a 4070 or 4060 base? Why not release those and later on, once yields are getting better, refresh mid cycle with an improved 4060 GPU? I don't know, but I have the feeling that Nvidia not only abondoned it's predictable classification of GPUs since Turing, but also makes it impossible for anybody not reading specs to make a proper decision. It used to be Titan / 80Ti / 80 / 70 / 60 / 50... now it's 90Ti (alleged) / 90 / 80 / 70Ti / 70 / 60Ti / 60 / and the unsellable 50 and maybe 50Ti at probably 400 / 450 $ MSRP... I'm finally realizing that it only gets more bothersome if GPUs with different core counts are effectively named the same.
Nvidia is trying to confuse gamers as much as possible so people don't realise the crappy value of the 4000 series...
mohiuddin:

Hope it is priced below 700$ Finally a low-mid range card below 700$ Thanks NVIDIA
Please tell me you are joking...
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/260/260828.jpg
Nvidia will compare it with the new 3060 that has lower bandwidth than the original ones
data/avatar/default/avatar10.webp
Im still happy on a 1080 pascal. seems I might be happy for a while.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/239/239175.jpg
The XX60 Ti models used to be fast and cheap. These days, we don't need leaks to know it's gonna be slow and expensive.
data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp
I really miss the good old days when lower end was 300 - 350 Euro and Highend was like 500 - 580 ~~~~ !
data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp
rx7700 waiting..
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Im not buying another 8gb card as im already having issues and not being able to max out textures in games even at 1440p. Now 4070 12gb sounds alot more interesting.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56004.jpg
Picolete:

Nvidia will compare it with the new 3060 that has lower bandwidth than the original ones
Exactly! They can now say, "Look, the RTX 3060 (8GB) has 128bit memory bus, so does the new RTX 4060 Ti, they're the same so what's the big deal?"
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/238/238795.jpg
8GB? 128-bit? Probably $700. So the specs of 2010 with the pricing of 2022. This generation is crazy.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Serotonin:

8GB? 128-bit? Probably $700. So the specs of 2010 with the pricing of 2022. This generation is crazy.
Lets be realistic its not gonna be 700$ but most likely close. Something like 499$ which is a 100$ jump from 3060ti. Sounds reasonable(in Jensens head). 😀
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/268/268248.jpg
Serotonin:

8GB? 128-bit? Probably $700. So the specs of 2010 with the pricing of 2022. This generation is crazy.
Go farther back Radeon 9700 pro kicked the fx5800 ass for a big part cause 256bit memory interface vs 128 Nvidia next came out with the 5900 that had 256 bit and it was competitive but the mindshare of the fx was so far gone they just erased the fx naming completely next generation!
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/294/294824.jpg
This better be below $500... otherwise, you might as well just go get a decent 2nd hard card at $700.