Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Beta Specs

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Beta Specs on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/236/236670.jpg
Call of Duty = hey it's finally autumn!.....now where's my cash cow! glad to see this game can run good on my setup.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Good to see 1660 and 580 can handle the game at highest settings.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/267/267153.jpg
So windows 7 are now officially DX12 compatible system.
data/avatar/default/avatar31.webp
Yup, World of Warcraft was the first game to support DX12 on Win7, and since last month every studio has been able to support DX12 on Windows 7. Current games will require a patch though.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
Undying:

Good to see 1660 and 580 can handle the game at highest settings.
That's highly relative. If people making those stats believe that minimum requirement HW should do 30fps+ on low details... And if recommended can do 60fps+ on medium details...
data/avatar/default/avatar26.webp
Played it for a few hours and asked for a refund. The lag engine is the worst i have ever seen. You are not seeing what other players are. Bugs, yes it is a BETA but wtf man!!!!! The cheating, surprise, surprise another COD game and the cheats owning it already. Every COD game for the past 12 years, well from the beginning really, is just owned by the cheats and nothing or very, very little is done. It is just now they do even about it. You pay stupid amounts of money for a game that you will be restricted in game progression regardless of skill. But people are stupid, and Activision will take your money if you are stupid enough to give it to them.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/275/275511.jpg
Undying:

Good to see 1660 and 580 can handle the game at highest settings.
Honestly, I don't see anything good. I really don't understand why such high system requirements are. Graphics looks awful. It's not even 2010! Minimum system requirements should be enough for max settings. Just for comparison: friend's GTX 760 at absolute minimum graphics barely hit 40 FPS in MW2019, but has 60+ on Ultra (without MSAA) in Battlefield 4 (2013) which is much larger and much more beautiful. It's ridiculous! Activision should have spent time optimizing the engine, not an aggressive advertising. [spoiler]https://i.imgur.com/0QCEi9B.png[/spoiler]
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/273/273678.jpg
what the hell did you break in your game files?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/275/275511.jpg
Astyanax:

what the hell did you break in your game files?
Nothing. It always happens for a split second after returning to the lobby. Check MW subreddit, there are many similar screenshots with other operators.
data/avatar/default/avatar22.webp
Very generic shooter. Gave it a try, it runs... OK, I guess, I don't have much to protest, 1080p maxed it stays mostly between 75 and 100 fps. I just wish we would get some innovation. It's so tiring seeing all this rehashing of old crap. Give us something fresh.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56686.jpg
Kutep0v:

Honestly, I don't see anything good. I really don't understand why such high system requirements are. Graphics looks awful. It's not even 2010! Minimum system requirements should be enough for max settings. Just for comparison: friend's GTX 760 at absolute minimum graphics barely hit 40 FPS in MW2019, but has 60+ on Ultra (without MSAA) in Battlefield 4 (2013) which is much larger and much more beautiful. It's ridiculous! Activision should have spent time optimizing the engine, not an aggressive advertising. [spoiler]https://i.imgur.com/0QCEi9B.png[/spoiler]
think the game looks better like that then again it still wont make me like CoD or the series in general
toyo:

Very generic shooter. Gave it a try, it runs... OK, I guess, I don't have much to protest, 1080p maxed it stays mostly between 75 and 100 fps. I just wish we would get some innovation. It's so tiring seeing all this rehashing of old crap. Give us something fresh.
So long as masses keep buy the same thing every years like Madden and other such games there wont be much change, CoD was eh 10 years ago and it still is imo
data/avatar/default/avatar26.webp
Usually I dont like Cod (I prefer BF 😀) but this time , I tried the open beta and honestly , the game seems good for me : the 2 us 2 mode is very fun. Ok graphics are not better thant BF , but the new engine is not bad. Actually I dont know if I ll buy the game but pleasantly surprised !
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/262/262995.jpg
I don't understand the thinking behind calling it Modern Warfare. CoD Modern Warfare came out 12 years ago. Why would they name it exactly the same as a previous iteration. I guess this shows the lack of imagination shown by the developers, something we've seen for years. Another CoD, meh.
data/avatar/default/avatar18.webp
Plays pretty good at around 50-60FPS on a HD7970 3GB. All Low Settings. 1080p