6-core Ryzen 5 1600X Benchmarks seem to be 50% faster than Core i5 7600K

Published by

Click here to post a comment for 6-core Ryzen 5 1600X Benchmarks seem to be 50% faster than Core i5 7600K on our message forum
#5394194
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/237/237771.jpg
Now this is nice to see. Can't wait to see a full review from you boss.
#5394198
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Massive increase in single threaded performance compared to FX CPUs. This is looking good indeed.
#5394200
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/268/268749.jpg
These 6 core Ryzen cpus will be a huge hit. As soon as they hit the market, I'll be putting my current rig up for sale. I need something with more cores/threads
#5394202
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/250/250418.jpg
Holy crap! In comparison my i5 2500k @ 4Ghz is getting me 1516 Single Thread Score and 3915 Multi Thread Score...Zen really brought back my need for a new CPU.
#5394204
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/99/99142.jpg
Interesting. If this is anywhere near true, I'll be buying the 1700/x. Could this be the "new Sandy Bridge" cpu?
#5394207
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/263/263845.jpg
Finally IPC, looks good.
#5394209
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115710.jpg
I get ~1900 single threaded score with 3770K @ 4,4 GHz so this looks really promising if true.
#5394210
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/247/247268.jpg
Holy crap! In comparison my i5 2500k @ 4Ghz is getting me 1516 Single Thread Score and 3915 Multi Thread Score...Zen really brought back my need for a new CPU.
1739 and 6667 here, i5 2500K @ 4.6 GHz 🙂
#5394217
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/165/165326.jpg
Awesome performance on single treaded and multitreaded applications , massive increased in ipc performance across the board ! Ryzen will give Intel a good fight with much , much lower price. Let the war on performance / price ratio begin !
#5394225
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216349.jpg
So the the 7600K is 13% faster in single threaded benches and then it looses in multi threaded by 50% to the 1600X because of the core differences. If you take the speed advantage of the 7600k then it means that Ryzen offers 90% in single thread performance. Very nice numbers to AMD if my math is correct. Please guys, verify my math!:roll: If AMD releases this soon i might pick one otherwise i´m gonna buy a 7600K...
#5394227
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/265/265827.jpg
2286 / 8930 6600k@4,5
#5394228
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/169/169351.jpg
4690k at standard clocks here score 1770 and 6850 https://puu.sh/u7m8F/b5d7b977ad.png If Ryzen is going to deliver what we're seeing here, this is definitely going to shake things up!
#5394231
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/237/237771.jpg
So the the 7600K is 13% faster in single threaded benches and then it looses in multi threaded by 50% to the 1600X because of the core differences. If you take the speed advantage of the 7600k then it means that Ryzen offers 90% in single thread performance. Very nice numbers to AMD if my math is correct. Please guys, verify my math!:roll: If AMD releases this soon i might pick one otherwise i´m gonna buy a 7600K...
Keep in mind the speed difference Ryzen at 3.7 7600k at 4.2.
#5394235
data/avatar/default/avatar33.webp
1739 and 6667 here, i5 2500K @ 4.6 GHz 🙂
Stange I get 1706 single and multi 5712, 2500K @4.5, single seems right. but my multi thread almost 1000 less? Maybe you got a much beter motherboard or something does ram frequency count in this? doubt is somehow. Any case makes me want to upgrade again but money is so tight, and I see prices of ram has gone up quickly as well, will need to upgrade everything. Well done to AMD, hope they make a comeback as they really do need it. This will benefit everybody.
#5394236
data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp
Keep in mind the speed difference Ryzen at 3.7 7600k at 4.2.
Exactly, the frequency ratio seems to be the same as in their performance 4.2 / 3.7 = 1.1351 2135 / 1888 = 1.1308 --> same IPC. **IF** Ryzen overclocks well it's gonna be the obvious top choice for the same $$$
#5394237
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/254/254725.jpg
Interesting. If this is anywhere near true, I'll be buying the 1700/x. Could this be the "new Sandy Bridge" cpu?
Things are looking good if this and the supposed US price points are true. If it takes to OCing and has decent temps I think that would be a fair assessment 🤓.
#5394239
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Stange I get 1706 single and multi 5712, 2500K @4.5, single seems right. but my multi thread almost 1000 less? Maybe you got a much beter motherboard or something does ram frequency count in this? doubt is somehow.
Actually it does. As you can see above i got almost 7,000 with 2133mhz ram and slightly higher clocks. This only apply for multi but not single threaded.
#5394241
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/259/259654.jpg
Keep in mind the speed difference Ryzen at 3.7 7600k at 4.2.
That would make the Ryzen system to actually have higher IPC :3eyes:
#5394242
data/avatar/default/avatar36.webp
Exactly, the frequency ratio seems to be the same as in their performance 4.2 / 3.7 = 1.1351 2135 / 1888 = 1.1308 --> same IPC. **IF** Ryzen overclocks well it's gonna be the obvious top choice for the same $$$
Early reaction to overclocks achieved with Ryzen. http://i.imgur.com/t8fK2Po.png I can't wait!

Next Page