4K ASUS ROG Swift PG32 UQX Game Monitor Details Surface
Click here to post a comment for 4K ASUS ROG Swift PG32 UQX Game Monitor Details Surface on our message forum
Moonbogg
Probably around $3000.
RavenMaster
No HDMI 2.1 sockets for PS5 or XBSX.
Dragam1337
Could be the replacement for my xb321hk ! If it weren't for the lack hdmi 2.1, so we wouldn't have to use freggin compression...
GameLord
Is 10bitHDR+144Hz+4K possible on DP 1.4 at least with RGB or 4:4:4?
Dragam1337
No. It will be 4:2:2
Ricepudding
I thought display compression allowed it with no compromise?
Still its funny how expensive this monitor is going to be and they could throw in a HDMI 2.1 connection just for the sake of it?
WAR76
hdmi 2.0 ? = garbage
Undying
HDR1400 sounds nice.
Dragam1337
Well... there aint any compression that is no compromise... displayport compression is just less of a compromise than 4:2:2. But i don't believe there will be enough bandwidth with 4k,10 bit hdr, 144 hz, unless it's hdmi 2.1. Could ofc lower it to 8 bit, wouldn't change much for games.
DeskStar
Man that's going to be a lot of "rice!!"
Just messing around because of hilbert saying "no rice as of yet".
itpro
Display Port 2.0 and HDMI 2.1 are needed asap to become standard as default inputs. Overpriced junk of the past we buy now don't we? I'll pass with devil's laugh!
DeskStar
Just weird no 2.1 support?!?
Reddoguk
Nice amount of local dimming zones and 1400 HDR spec all amazing. Now if only they made a cheaper 1440p (240hz) version like the G7 i'd buy one tomorrow.
Denial
Lol they announced this monitor in January 2020 and still isn't out yet. This is like the fourth "premiere" monitor in a row ASUS announces like years before it comes out. Makes it feel like last years technology.
I'd rather have a 32" OLED
gloves085
Came here to say this, this monitor is WAAAAY overdue, hence the HDMI 2.0 I'd wager. They should've reworked the internals in the meantime, given the likely pricing this is now a hard pass for me, though I would've jumped at it 18 months ago at 'almost' any price.
Lasermarx
At this point, if this monitor is over $1,400 then I would rather get an OLED 43 inch from LG. They should definitely hold this back and upgrade the mainboard as, many 4K 120 monitors are coming out.
amnforge
Leave it to this Asian to point out the rice typo o_O
amnforge
I have the LG CX 48" and would recommend it! Besides my LG 4k 144hz (160 oc) I use my CX everyday. Plus, it's great for my ps5 and xbox series x gaming. The only drawback i've experienced is the input lag compared to gaming monitors. But idt competitive gamers would use a 48" screen anyhow. It's a great experience. You should be able to get a cx for a little cheaper than I did for $1500 as the C1 (2021) is or will be out soon.
Error8
Hard to believe that you can observe the difference in input lag, in game mode, on a CX vs any other monitor.
Anyway, what I don't like about this Asus is that they're using an IPS! But just why? No matter the dimming zones, the display will have to cope with that "extreme" 1000:1 contrast, which is so very bad.
ChisChas
As others have said, this is old news. There's no need for HDR 1400, HDR 1000 is easily bright enough playing games like FC5. Fantastic to have all those local dimming zones but I bet this screen is going to be VERY, VERY EXPENSIVE. A 42" OLED LG is a far better proposition.
