3D Mark Port Royal Raytracing Benchmarks (GeForce RTX series)

Published by

Click here to post a comment for 3D Mark Port Royal Raytracing Benchmarks (GeForce RTX series) on our message forum
#5625145
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
I hope the 1080ti owners get to compare without using rtx dx12 api segmenting of the market is bad, so i hope their given the option to see and compare using planar and cubemap reflections to make a honest comparison on and off so they can make a choice to purchase or not with open eyes.
#5625184
data/avatar/default/avatar27.webp
On RTX 2080 Ti gets only 37 fps?! But... 2560x1440 is too very heavy for RTX 2080Ti, if the ray-tracing is used and very COMPLEX. We want 1920x1080 for performance increased to 65~70 fps (DXR test) because I'm very happy for this resolution screen "satisfied". I don't care higher resolution than 1920x1080 on RTX-on or non-RTX games. 🙂
#5625215
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/123/123974.jpg
Hulk12:

On RTX 2080 Ti gets only 37 fps?! But... 2560x1440 is too very heavy for RTX 2080Ti, if the ray-tracing is used and very COMPLEX. We want 1920x1080 for performance increased to 65~70 fps (DXR test) because I'm very happy for this resolution screen "satisfied". I don't care higher resolution than 1920x1080 on RTX-on or non-RTX games. 🙂
You realize this isn't a game right?
#5625219
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
999Anticlock9wiSe:

I hope the 1080ti owners get to compare without using rtx dx12 api segmenting of the market is bad, so i hope their given the option to see and compare using planar and cubemap reflections to make a honest comparison on and off so they can make a choice to purchase or not with open eyes.
This is a Ray-Tracing benchmark, not a showcase. They won't spend time into pre-raytracing hacks to make it look good.
#5625221
data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp
No Volta test? 🙂
#5625226
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Jumbik:

No Volta test? 🙂
Much like Titan RTX - NVIDIA never seeded one, but purchase one and send it to me 😉
#5625250
data/avatar/default/avatar09.webp
Hilbert Hagedoorn:

Much like Titan RTX - NVIDIA never seeded one, but purchase one and send it to me 😉
Maybe you should start a youtube channel too as it seems like all the big channels got it. But I suppose you are already occupied enough with the website stuff.
#5625252
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
Hulk12:

On RTX 2080 Ti gets only 37 fps?! But... 2560x1440 is too very heavy for RTX 2080Ti, if the ray-tracing is used and very COMPLEX. We want 1920x1080 for performance increased to 65~70 fps (DXR test) because I'm very happy for this resolution screen "satisfied". I don't care higher resolution than 1920x1080 on RTX-on or non-RTX games. 🙂
It's benchmark. They set up something heavier, so you can use it as reference for few years. Wanna fps over 60? Wait for next generation.
#5625266
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/220/220755.jpg
nhlkoho:

You realize this isn't a game right?
Wait.. this is not a game?! damn... that make sense, i always get more or less the same score no matter how much my skills have improved playing this games over the years.
#5625310
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/245/245544.jpg
Cards at stock I guess? Mine came in at just over 9000 pts
#5625316
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Party Poison:

Cards at stock I guess? Mine came in at just over 9000 pts
Well buddy, ... it says so in the news item .. "See below the results of reference clocked cards"
#5625337
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/245/245544.jpg
Hilbert Hagedoorn:

Well buddy, ... it says so in the news item .. "See below the results of reference clocked cards"
Bugger, Missed that totally my bad. Apologies.
#5625742
data/avatar/default/avatar05.webp
Something interesting from testing Port Royal: REMOVED - No shameless promoting your YT channel here, please. RTX 2060 and 1920x1080
#5626045
data/avatar/default/avatar09.webp
Jumbik:

Maybe you should start a youtube channel too as it seems like all the big channels got it. But I suppose you are already occupied enough with the website stuff.
I think Hilbert should totally do this. With the quality of material you produce Hilbert, it will be quite popular.
#5626054
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
Weak scores. Overpriced products.
#5626140
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
Xtreme1979:

Jealous much? What's your score?
XD let's say I'm indifferent well I wouldn't be thrilled with 23fps , heck even 40 on 2080ti look crap and nothing to brag about, not for 1200€.
#5626142
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
-Tj-:

XD let's say I'm indifferent well I wouldn't be thrilled with 23fps , heck even 40 on 2080ti look crap and nothing to brag about, not for 1200€.
... like every single 3DMark benchmark is made intentionally hard so it scales into the future. The framerate is not indicative of anything outside of comparisons to other cards - so who cares if it's only getting 40fps?