12K gaming rig renders 1.5 billion pixels per second for just $17,000
Click here to post a comment for 12K gaming rig renders 1.5 billion pixels per second for just $17,000 on our message forum
NAMEk
I find myself more into 16:9 than 7:3, i don't talk about your insane setup 16:3 @ 1.5GP ;D and i hate those edges, god i so hate them...
btw, what was the PSU you used?
TheDeeGee
30 FPS for 17000 Dollar 😀
PCElite
5k monitors 😥
LesserHellspawn
I'm really surprised that just two cards were able to deliver 60 FPS.
Texter
Some people get their seizures for free...
TheDeeGee
In the video he said:
"...and i'm still getting 30 to 35 frames per second..."
Medium to High settings.
Pill Monster
Right.....
http://i1294.photobucket.com/albums/b608/pillmonsta1/Capture_zps4799ba5f.png
warlord
:3eyes: well if somebody has so much money i think it would be a waste to buy an almost high-end card like 7970 which is weaker than both gtx780 and TITAN
Neo Cyrus
You missed a few... as in every single edge you didn't circle. :wanker:
StewieTech
Meh;
We need 4k as standard. These 1080p bastards are becoming annoying, we need to move forward.
GeniusPr0
Facepalmed hahah
edit--
awww, read that he had to ship it back
CPC_RedDawn
Yes that was the triple 4K with three 7970's but when he went with just 1 4k display they took out one 7970 and just used two and still they got over 100fps which is just insane. But I have a feeling that Dirt3 was not a very good game to show off as its one of the easiest games to run maxed out for literally any modern day video card. They could of used GRID2 as its the same engine and its very well optimized for AMD Eyefinity but has some better graphical effects. Though we would all love to see the performance of Crysis 3 on these monitors and that set up. I would like to see if the 6GB VRAM 7970's would of made a difference with AA levels and performance? Also testing out GTX780's and TITANS for comparison would of been nice.
Lane
You need a zoom for show this , what do you think ? with 3x 4K display ( 32" each ), you see the aliasing ? im not so sure.
Pill Monster
That image is actual size, how could it possibly be zoomed when it's a screenshot taken from a 32" monitor?
Original....I just cropped it.
http://blogs.windows.com/cfs-file.ashx/__key/communityserver-blogs-components-weblogfiles/00-00-00-59-36-metablogapi/dirt3_2D00_11520x2160_2D00_3x1_2D00_30hz_5F00_3E932389.jpg
_Franky_
Just to let you know, in the huge screenshot, Steam is showing your serial key. :0 might wanna remove that...
sw1000xg
WTF what is wrong with people today? 17K to play what? Console games? Seriously? If I paid that I would want ILM graphics! Where are the TRUE PC games that fully utilize the best cards out there... Oh yeah there aren't any!
yasamoka
*puts off fire*
GeniusPr0
They were lent to him to try... lol
Pill Monster
So MetroLL and Crysis3 going well on your 660Ti? What about FC3 in DX11?
All running 60fps at max settings I suppose?
Aura89
...He's correct, you aren't.
You're viewing the extremely high resolution on your monitor (presumably 1920x1080 or smaller, maybe 1920x1200) as if it the same resolution, ofcourse you're going to get aliasing, we don't have the pixel density to show how AA isn't necessarily needed at such a high resolution, you'd only be able to see that on the monitor itself
on a 32" display with a 4K resolution the pixel density should be 137.68 PPI
on a 24-27" display with 1920x1200 resolution the pixel density should be 91.79 PPI (24") to 81.59 PPI (27")
We'd have to have a 1920x1200 16" monitor to have the same PPI as that 32" 4K tv to show the same level of unneeded AA in-game
But no matter what, you can't judge that picture on your monitor and decide that his comment about not needing AA was incorrect, you're not seeing what he's seeing
