F1 2020: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Intel Core i7-10700K processor review
Deepcool Gamerstorm Castle 280EX liquid cooler review
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT review
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT review
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT review
Crucial P2 500 GB NVMe M2 SSD review
ASUS STRIX B550-I Gaming review
Kioxia Exceria 1TB M.2 NVMe SSD review
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB SSD review
Review: AMD FX 8350 processor
In this article we test and review the new AMD FX 8350 processor. AMD unleashes PileDriver cores on the new Vishera a codenamed architecture. The CPU tested today has eight physical CPU cores, it will have a base clock of 4000 MHz, and can Turbo towards 4200 MHz. And that makes the FX series a multi-threaded high frequency monster.
You can read our the Guru3D review right here of course.
Tagged as:
AMD
Review: MSI GeForce GTX 660 HAWK Edition - 10/22/2012 11:42 AM
We review the MSI GeForce GTX 660 HAWK graphics card in this article. The all customiuzed MSI HAWK is released in the mid-range segment, yet received a high-end treatment from MSI.
Review: Gigabyte GA-F2A85X UP4 motherboard - 10/08/2012 06:36 AM
In this review slash article we test Gigabyte's GA-F2A85X UP4 motherboard. A motherboard that is intended for the Trinity APU architecture processors from AMD will offer tremendous value for money wh...
Review: Gigabyte GV-R485OC-1GI Radeon HD 4850 1GB [Guru3D] - 09/18/2008 09:59 AM
We test the Gigabyte GV-R485OC-1GI Radeon HD 4850 equipped with 1GB of DDR3 memory. It has a custom PCB (printed circuit board), comes with no less than 1 Gigabyte of GDDR3 framebuffer (memory), the m...
review: Passively cooled Sparkle GeForce 9600 GT - 08/07/2008 08:57 AM
I had a peek around for an exotic model GeForce 9600 GT. I ended up with Sparkle .. get this .. 99 EUR for their passively cooled product with 512MB GDDR3 memory. I'm sorry but that's just a heck of ...
review: Radeon HD 4850 and 4870 CrossfireX performance test - 07/03/2008 10:47 AM
Radeon HD 4850 and 4870 CrossfireX performance test Guru3D posted a Radeon 4850 and 4870 Crossfire review. Since Radeon series 4800 cards offer so much value, it might even be interesting to pair them...
glutto
Senior Member
Posts: 586
Joined: 2002-12-05
Senior Member
Posts: 586
Joined: 2002-12-05
#4436886 Posted on: 10/23/2012 06:34 AM
This might be a decent and cheap upgrade from my Q6600.
A few weeks ago I was tempted with the 8120 and 8150, but I remembered Piledriver was right around the corner.
This might be a decent and cheap upgrade from my Q6600.
A few weeks ago I was tempted with the 8120 and 8150, but I remembered Piledriver was right around the corner.
red6joker
Senior Member
Posts: 572
Joined: 2010-12-16
Senior Member
Posts: 572
Joined: 2010-12-16
#4436899 Posted on: 10/23/2012 06:59 AM
AMD said it would only be a 10% increase performance wise in a statement awhile back. So not really surprising i guess, it is looking pretty tempting for an upgrade from my 1055t though.
AMD said it would only be a 10% increase performance wise in a statement awhile back. So not really surprising i guess, it is looking pretty tempting for an upgrade from my 1055t though.
Penal Stingray
Senior Member
Posts: 957
Joined: 2010-12-17
Senior Member
Posts: 957
Joined: 2010-12-17
#4436902 Posted on: 10/23/2012 07:10 AM
This is why amd cpu deparment is loosing money the performance is just not there even the old i7 980x beats it on most benches. their gpu on the other hand are sweet. but their gpu was ATI so lmao!
This is why amd cpu deparment is loosing money the performance is just not there even the old i7 980x beats it on most benches. their gpu on the other hand are sweet. but their gpu was ATI so lmao!
IcE
Moderator
Posts: 10693
Joined: 2008-11-01
Moderator
Posts: 10693
Joined: 2008-11-01
#4436927 Posted on: 10/23/2012 08:10 AM
The 980X is a six core (and also dusts the sandy bridge mainstream chips in almost every case, and costs like $1000) so it's not really surprising. At the end of the day, these Bulldozer/Piledriver chips are still four core CPU's when it comes to floating point.
I'm somewhat impressed with this small bump in performance, actually. For $195, it competes very, very well with the Intel offerings at that price range. Sure, the Far Cry 2 test makes it look bad (like every AMD CPU since that game was released), but other than that, bravo. I actually won't feel bad recommending this to people as an actual upgrade.
This is why amd cpu deparment is loosing money the performance is just not there even the old i7 980x beats it on most benches. their gpu on the other hand are sweet. but their gpu was ATI so lmao!
The 980X is a six core (and also dusts the sandy bridge mainstream chips in almost every case, and costs like $1000) so it's not really surprising. At the end of the day, these Bulldozer/Piledriver chips are still four core CPU's when it comes to floating point.
I'm somewhat impressed with this small bump in performance, actually. For $195, it competes very, very well with the Intel offerings at that price range. Sure, the Far Cry 2 test makes it look bad (like every AMD CPU since that game was released), but other than that, bravo. I actually won't feel bad recommending this to people as an actual upgrade.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Posts: 21631
Joined: 2008-07-14
Nice to see AMD make some gains, though not quite as far as I was hoping for. Now to wait for Steamroller....