Patriot Viper V765 Keyboard Review
Combo deal: Office 2016 Pro and W10 for $34
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: RTX and DLSS Update
ASUS RT-AX88U (AX6000) router review
The Division 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review
URCDkey Spring Sale(up to 86% off) Windows 10 Pro $11
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming X review
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 VENTUS XS 6G OC review
Palit GeForce GTX 1660 StormX OC review
Corsair Crystal 680X PC Chassis Review
Quick test: Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus Adaptive Shading Benchmarks
A newly released patch for Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus has been released and interestingly enough, it adds support for NVIDIA Turing's Adaptive Shading. The claims have been enticing, higher performance should be reached with this new technology.
With adaptive shading, an algorithm looks at the previous frame and then will determine which parts of the current frame can contain less detail without it having noticeable image quality loss (basically where you look with your eyes is shaded the best, the rest a little less). In areas where you hardly look with your eyes shading does not take place per pixel, but per 4 pixels.
-- Patch info -- A new patch has been deployed to implement NVIDIA Adaptive Shading, improving the performance of Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus. We’ve been working with NVIDIA to make sure the game runs great on NVIDIA RTX hardware. Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus debuts the first implementation of NAS.
Additional patch notes:
- Added support for NVIDIA Adaptive Shading on NVIDIA RTX series GPUs. (Improves frame rate by dynamically adjusting the shading resolution in different areas of the screen, without affecting fidelity).
- Ensured that, on multiple GPU systems, the discrete GPU is preferred over an integrated GPU.
- Players can now choose to ignore/suppress warnings when the selected video settings exceed the amount of dedicated VRAM available on the GPU
- Fixes for skinning issues on GTX 970
The patch was released yesterday and I decided to see how much of a difference it really makes. In the test results below you can see the performance differences. The test has been conducted on our eight-core Haswell-E platform at 4200 MHz on all cores and a GeForce RTX 2080. Adaptive shading can be selected in the settings, at several stages. Off, quality, balanced and performance. You can also set a custom profile setting. Since full HD is CPU limited on the GeForce RTX 2080 we skipped that resolution, below 2560x1440 (WQHD) and 3840x2160 (Ultra HD) average framerates measured on a 30 seconds recorded run per preset and resolution.
We can confirm we see very little image quality degradation if you can notice it at all. We rendered at the Mein Leben! preset, customized with adaptive shading. From off to adaptive performance mode you are looking at roughly a 5% performance differential on a game that already is offering breathtaking framerates on any Turing based graphics card.
And per request, the same result set at a normalized scale:
Quick test: DeepCool MF120 Frameless RGB Fan w/ WIFI controller - 02/23/2018 03:19 PM
In this quick test, we briefly peek at the new MF120 Frameless WIFI RGB series fans from DeepCool, the fans are not just unique looking with an aluminum base finish, the RGB LED strip can be controlle...
Quick test: Corsair PBT Double-Shot Keycaps - 01/26/2018 10:11 AM
We check out some plastics today, as we review the new PBT Double-Shot Keycaps from Corsair, compatible with their K95, K70, K65, K66, K63 and STRAFE keyboard models. The new keycaps are extremely dur...
Quick test: Futuremark 3DMark v2.3.3663 Vulkan API Overhead Benchmarks - 03/23/2017 03:39 PM
Futuremark just released 3DMark v2.3.3663 with support for Vulkan in their API overhead test, we ran some quick tests to see what is happeing....
Quick Test: 3DMark TimeSpy DirectX 12 Benchmarks - 07/15/2016 10:29 AM
For those that missed the news. it seems that Time Spy, the new DirectX 12 benchmark test from Futuremark is available as DLC right now on Steam, coming soon to all Windows editions of 3DMark. With i...
Quick test: DirectX 12 API Overhead Benchmark results - 03/26/2015 07:09 PM
As you guys know, DirectX 12 is going to greatly free up processor utilization, and thus your games can make more draw-calls with your processor. More efficient usage of CPUs with multiple cores is tr...
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34669
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34669
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5609053 Posted on: 11/20/2018 03:24 PM
It's a way to zoom in at perf differentials when they are small, but sure I can understand why you ask that. I have added normalized charts as well.
Graph should start at 0fps...
It's a way to zoom in at perf differentials when they are small, but sure I can understand why you ask that. I have added normalized charts as well.
Rich_Guy
Senior Member
Posts: 12106
Joined: 2003-05-11
Senior Member
Posts: 12106
Joined: 2003-05-11
#5609057 Posted on: 11/20/2018 03:29 PM
so a couple of frames more ?
so a couple of frames more ?
anxious_f0x
Senior Member
Posts: 1422
Joined: 2013-11-08
Senior Member
Posts: 1422
Joined: 2013-11-08
#5609063 Posted on: 11/20/2018 03:33 PM
Fairly small uplift in performance but with Wolfenstein 2 already running well on the RTX cards I guess it’s to be expected.
I’m looking forward to seeing what Doom Eternal runs like on these.
Fairly small uplift in performance but with Wolfenstein 2 already running well on the RTX cards I guess it’s to be expected.
I’m looking forward to seeing what Doom Eternal runs like on these.
Yttersta
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: 2012-05-23
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: 2012-05-23
#5609079 Posted on: 11/20/2018 04:15 PM
Far, far better representation of the results in the normalized charts. Thank you HH.
It's a way to zoom in at perf differentials when they are small, but sure I can understand why you ask that. I have added normalized charts as well.
Far, far better representation of the results in the normalized charts. Thank you HH.
phawkins633
Junior Member
Posts: 18
Joined: 2007-05-30
Junior Member
Posts: 18
Joined: 2007-05-30
#5609080 Posted on: 11/20/2018 04:16 PM
[QUOTE="I’m looking forward to seeing what Doom Eternal runs like on these.
Ah yes.....me too!!!
[QUOTE="I’m looking forward to seeing what Doom Eternal runs like on these.
Ah yes.....me too!!!
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 8506
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 8506
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5609125 Posted on: 11/20/2018 06:14 PM
I expected more, but I think that it depends on developer's decision. And those ~5% is not bad, it may allow you to use some other effect you would otherwise opt to disable.
so a couple of frames more ?
I expected more, but I think that it depends on developer's decision. And those ~5% is not bad, it may allow you to use some other effect you would otherwise opt to disable.
BlackZero
Senior Member
Posts: 8737
Joined: 2007-06-17
Senior Member
Posts: 8737
Joined: 2007-06-17
#5609134 Posted on: 11/20/2018 07:00 PM
Smart idea.
Let's hope we don't get the same complaints from a small number of people as with depth of field, i.e. simply not realising that normally we do not focus on anything other than what we are looking at.
Smart idea.
Let's hope we don't get the same complaints from a small number of people as with depth of field, i.e. simply not realising that normally we do not focus on anything other than what we are looking at.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 10555
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 10555
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5609142 Posted on: 11/20/2018 07:25 PM
Any visual difference?
Any visual difference?
WareTernal
Senior Member
Posts: 247
Joined: 2013-09-27
Senior Member
Posts: 247
Joined: 2013-09-27
#5609177 Posted on: 11/20/2018 08:52 PM
'we see very little image quality degradation'
The tech works by reducing quality in areas you are less likely to notice.
It would be nice to see some real screenshots to show the difference in IQ at the different adaptive settings.
From the slide titled 'content adaptive shading':
This appears to show at least some loss of detail, but the original shots were not taken from the exact same perspective so it's hard to say for sure.
Any visual difference?
'we see very little image quality degradation'
The tech works by reducing quality in areas you are less likely to notice.
It would be nice to see some real screenshots to show the difference in IQ at the different adaptive settings.
From the slide titled 'content adaptive shading':
This appears to show at least some loss of detail, but the original shots were not taken from the exact same perspective so it's hard to say for sure.
ruthan
Senior Member
Posts: 217
Joined: 2016-05-24
Senior Member
Posts: 217
Joined: 2016-05-24
#5609212 Posted on: 11/20/2018 10:03 PM
So whole 3% improvement and worse image quality, no game changer at all, maybe it would be cheaper just decrease filtering quality with existing features for same effect
So whole 3% improvement and worse image quality, no game changer at all, maybe it would be cheaper just decrease filtering quality with existing features for same effect
bobmitch
Senior Member
Posts: 389
Joined: 2007-03-08
Senior Member
Posts: 389
Joined: 2007-03-08
#5609219 Posted on: 11/20/2018 10:24 PM
Funny...I can't get the game to run while Afterburner is running. I get opening screens, then everything goes black. Steam forum for the game, other users have the same issue. To get the game to run, you have to shut down Afterburner (running the 4.6 latest beta for Turing)
Funny...I can't get the game to run while Afterburner is running. I get opening screens, then everything goes black. Steam forum for the game, other users have the same issue. To get the game to run, you have to shut down Afterburner (running the 4.6 latest beta for Turing)
pharma
Senior Member
Posts: 972
Joined: 2003-09-10
Senior Member
Posts: 972
Joined: 2003-09-10
#5609222 Posted on: 11/20/2018 10:26 PM
Other reviews also noted no change in visual quality, but at least the tech works right?
And together with the other Turning performance enhancements should bring 4K @60 fps just a step closer for cards just under the ceiling.
Other reviews also noted no change in visual quality, but at least the tech works right?
And together with the other Turning performance enhancements should bring 4K @60 fps just a step closer for cards just under the ceiling.
pharma
Senior Member
Posts: 972
Joined: 2003-09-10
Senior Member
Posts: 972
Joined: 2003-09-10
#5609224 Posted on: 11/20/2018 10:29 PM
Some guy said you need to delete the games config file.
Funny...I can't get the game to run while Afterburner is running. I get opening screens, then everything goes black. Steam forum for the game, other users have the same issue. To get the game to run, you have to shut down Afterburner (running the 4.6 latest beta for Turing)
Some guy said you need to delete the games config file.
H83
Senior Member
Posts: 2590
Joined: 2009-09-08
Senior Member
Posts: 2590
Joined: 2009-09-08
#5609251 Posted on: 11/20/2018 11:49 PM
Not a big fan of having to use "cheap" tricks on high end cards to increase performance... Although using tricks seems to be the only way forward because we are going to hit a wall regarding the size of future GPUs...
Not a big fan of having to use "cheap" tricks on high end cards to increase performance... Although using tricks seems to be the only way forward because we are going to hit a wall regarding the size of future GPUs...
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Junior Member
Posts: 10
Joined: 2017-03-31
Can you not do graphs like this? I really think it is misleading.
Graph should start at 0fps...