Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 liquid cooler review
Team Group MP33 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
ADATA SE800 1TB Portable SSD review
Promo: Microsoft Office 2016 for $29.82
Corsair H100i RGB Pro XT liquid cooler review
Corsair K95 RGB PLATINUM XT review
AORUS Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro licenses for only 12 USD
Endgame XM1 gaming mouse review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - December 2019
Battlefield 5: Graphics Options of the Open Beta + Quickie 4K video
If you have pre-ordered or are an EA Access, Origin Access and Origin Access Premium subscriber, you can now play the open Beta of Battlefield V. We've just fooled around with it for a little while, these are your graphics settings.
First off, I might be able to perform a graphics perf review, as the game does run well on existing drivers. That said, the beta is an open multi-player only and the difficulty here is that you will spawn at random location and on either side. The random swaps place you at a different location making it very difficult to objectively measure performance. I'll give that a few more tries though, we'll see if it can be done.
Battlefield V Open beta - Rotterdam - 4k Ultra - TAA - HBAO - GTX 1080 Ti
Good news though, the beta is showing many PC graphics options like the quality of textures, texture filtering, lighting, effects, post-processing, mesh, terrain and anti-aliasing (TAA) are listed. Ambient occlusion can also be set HBAO. Gamers also have the ability to change the resolution, limit the frame rate, adjust the field-of-view, adjust effects such as vignettes or motion blur, or resolution scale. You can choose DX12, missing, however, are GeForce RTX related options, which makes sense as DirectX RT needs to be released by Microsoft first. Below a couple of screenshots showing the graphics settings.
EA Delays Battlefield V release by a month - 08/30/2018 09:07 PM
EA has announced that Battlefield 5 - originally due for release October 19 - has been pushed back on its release date by a month, it will now release November 20....
Battlefield V: GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Rotterdam Gameplay - 08/30/2018 07:22 AM
So how does A GeForce RTX 1080 Ti play Battlefield V? Nvidia answered that question by releasing a video showing three minutes of gameplay on the brand-new Rotterdam map that was presented at Gamescom...
Battlefield 5 MP gameplay trailer - 08/24/2018 08:18 AM
Electronic Arts and DICE have released a new multiplayer gameplay trailer for Battlefield 5. According to its description, and for the first time ever in Battlefield, players will be able to assemble ...
Shaky Cam Video - Battlefield 5 Ray Tracing Demos from NVIDIA RTX Editors event - 08/22/2018 03:19 PM
Over at NVIDIA editors day for GeForce RTX EA/DICE are presenting some stuff that isn't under embargo, so we can post about it. Below two shaky cam videos where you can hear the developers taking a...
Gamescom 2018: Battlefield 5 - Official The Company Trailer - 08/22/2018 05:24 AM
Discover 'The Company' in Battlefield V. For the first time ever in Battlefield, assemble a customized collection of soldiers, weapons, and vehicles, and take them on journey through World War 2. Se...
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1403
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1403
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5581259 Posted on: 09/04/2018 05:30 PM
Seems like basically the same graphics options as BF1, from what I can remember. I'm expecting it to run as well as BF1 in terms of like for like settings vs fps, but perhaps just a little bit slower as perhaps they've improved graphics a little over BF1 (not talking ray tracing here).
Seems like basically the same graphics options as BF1, from what I can remember. I'm expecting it to run as well as BF1 in terms of like for like settings vs fps, but perhaps just a little bit slower as perhaps they've improved graphics a little over BF1 (not talking ray tracing here).
Yxskaft
Senior Member
Posts: 1360
Joined: 2011-02-17
Senior Member
Posts: 1360
Joined: 2011-02-17
#5581262 Posted on: 09/04/2018 05:38 PM
Is DX12 still bad compared to DX11?
Is DX12 still bad compared to DX11?
Phill-7
Member
Posts: 80
Joined: 2004-05-17
Member
Posts: 80
Joined: 2004-05-17
#5581264 Posted on: 09/04/2018 05:46 PM
A little OC will get the performance over 60 fps for the 1080ti. Not bad. I guess I'll skip Turing for now.
A little OC will get the performance over 60 fps for the 1080ti. Not bad. I guess I'll skip Turing for now.
Dragam1337
Senior Member
Posts: 1499
Joined: 2017-11-23
Senior Member
Posts: 1499
Joined: 2017-11-23
#5581266 Posted on: 09/04/2018 05:49 PM
It runs alot slower than bf1... in bf1 i get 60+ fps with single gpu, here i get 40.
Seems like basically the same graphics options as BF1, from what I can remember. I'm expecting it to run as well as BF1 in terms of like for like settings vs fps, but perhaps just a little bit slower as perhaps they've improved graphics a little over BF1 (not talking ray tracing here).
It runs alot slower than bf1... in bf1 i get 60+ fps with single gpu, here i get 40.
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1403
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1403
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5581268 Posted on: 09/04/2018 05:54 PM
Right, thanks for the info, well that sucks! Is there a particular setting that is more costly than the corresponding setting in BF1 then? That's gonna be a difficult question to answer unless you've done a lot of testing & a lot of like-for-like comparisons with BF1, but figured I'd ask anyway!
It runs alot slower than bf1... in bf1 i get 60+ fps with single gpu, here i get 40.
Right, thanks for the info, well that sucks! Is there a particular setting that is more costly than the corresponding setting in BF1 then? That's gonna be a difficult question to answer unless you've done a lot of testing & a lot of like-for-like comparisons with BF1, but figured I'd ask anyway!
H1TMANza
Member
Posts: 42
Joined: 2016-01-21
Member
Posts: 42
Joined: 2016-01-21
#5581271 Posted on: 09/04/2018 05:59 PM
No beta benchmark review
I sad
No beta benchmark review
I sad
Dragam1337
Senior Member
Posts: 1499
Joined: 2017-11-23
Senior Member
Posts: 1499
Joined: 2017-11-23
#5581272 Posted on: 09/04/2018 06:02 PM
I am running identical settings to bf1... i reckon is simply geometry and asset quality being higher making it more demanding
Right, thanks for the info, well that sucks! Is there a particular setting that is more costly than the corresponding setting in BF1 then? That's gonna be a difficult question to answer unless you've done a lot of testing & a lot of like-for-like comparisons with BF1, but figured I'd ask anyway!
I am running identical settings to bf1... i reckon is simply geometry and asset quality being higher making it more demanding
Krasus
Senior Member
Posts: 150
Joined: 2010-12-26
Senior Member
Posts: 150
Joined: 2010-12-26
#5581275 Posted on: 09/04/2018 06:12 PM
Have any of you guys tried it with single channel 16 gb ram? I have i7 6700, gtx 1060 and it hovers between 40-60 fps whereas this one plays with almost steady 60 with dual channel 8gb:
Does it really makes such huge difference between dual and single channel ram?
Have any of you guys tried it with single channel 16 gb ram? I have i7 6700, gtx 1060 and it hovers between 40-60 fps whereas this one plays with almost steady 60 with dual channel 8gb:
Does it really makes such huge difference between dual and single channel ram?
ivan
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: 2017-09-27
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: 2017-09-27
#5581276 Posted on: 09/04/2018 06:13 PM
Are you running the lates NVIDIA driver optimized for BF V? (assuming you have a NVIDIA card)
399.07 I think
I am running identical settings to bf1... i reckon is simply geometry and asset quality being higher making it more demanding
Are you running the lates NVIDIA driver optimized for BF V? (assuming you have a NVIDIA card)
399.07 I think
Dragam1337
Senior Member
Posts: 1499
Joined: 2017-11-23
Senior Member
Posts: 1499
Joined: 2017-11-23
#5581278 Posted on: 09/04/2018 06:15 PM
Are you running the lates NVIDIA driver optimized for BF V? (assuming you have a NVIDIA card)
399.07 I think
Are you being funny? It wont let you start the game, unless you have the specific driver for it...
Are you running the lates NVIDIA driver optimized for BF V? (assuming you have a NVIDIA card)
399.07 I think
Are you being funny? It wont let you start the game, unless you have the specific driver for it...
Dragam1337
Senior Member
Posts: 1499
Joined: 2017-11-23
Senior Member
Posts: 1499
Joined: 2017-11-23
#5581282 Posted on: 09/04/2018 06:16 PM
Have any of you guys tried it with single channel 16 gb ram? I have i7 6700, gtx 1060 and it hovers between 40-60 fps whereas this one plays with almost steady 60 with dual channel 8gb:
Does it really makes such huge difference between dual and single channel ram?
Yes only having half the bandwidth, which is what you got with single channel, is going to hurt your performance..
Have any of you guys tried it with single channel 16 gb ram? I have i7 6700, gtx 1060 and it hovers between 40-60 fps whereas this one plays with almost steady 60 with dual channel 8gb:
Does it really makes such huge difference between dual and single channel ram?
Yes only having half the bandwidth, which is what you got with single channel, is going to hurt your performance..
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1403
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1403
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5581285 Posted on: 09/04/2018 06:28 PM
I am running identical settings to bf1... i reckon is simply geometry and asset quality being higher making it more demanding
Hmm, sounds like I'm gonna have to turn down a few settings to run 144 fps then. Haven't decided when I'm gonna buy the new one; I'm a late starter to BF1 as only been playing it about 6 months roughly, so I might just continue playing BF1 and then buy BF V when it's on sale.
Have any of you guys tried it with single channel 16 gb ram? I have i7 6700, gtx 1060 and it hovers between 40-60 fps whereas this one plays with almost steady 60 with dual channel 8gb:
Does it really makes such huge difference between dual and single channel ram?
Single channel RAM will hurt your CPU related performance really quite significantly, never have single channel RAM (if you can help it) on a gaming machine. BF 1 (and I'm assuming BF V) is very hard on your CPU, so your performance loss makes sense when running single channel RAM.
I am running identical settings to bf1... i reckon is simply geometry and asset quality being higher making it more demanding
Hmm, sounds like I'm gonna have to turn down a few settings to run 144 fps then. Haven't decided when I'm gonna buy the new one; I'm a late starter to BF1 as only been playing it about 6 months roughly, so I might just continue playing BF1 and then buy BF V when it's on sale.
Have any of you guys tried it with single channel 16 gb ram? I have i7 6700, gtx 1060 and it hovers between 40-60 fps whereas this one plays with almost steady 60 with dual channel 8gb:
Does it really makes such huge difference between dual and single channel ram?
Single channel RAM will hurt your CPU related performance really quite significantly, never have single channel RAM (if you can help it) on a gaming machine. BF 1 (and I'm assuming BF V) is very hard on your CPU, so your performance loss makes sense when running single channel RAM.
erho
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 2018-09-02
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 2018-09-02
#5581286 Posted on: 09/04/2018 06:29 PM
Game utilizes threads quite nicely:
Game utilizes threads quite nicely:
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1403
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1403
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5581288 Posted on: 09/04/2018 06:35 PM
Game utilizes threads quite nicely:
Yep, so there's 16 threads there being used quite equally. Can you remember what BF1 tops out at in terms of thread usage - how many can it use? I guess it's good if BF V can support more cores than BF 1.
Game utilizes threads quite nicely:
Yep, so there's 16 threads there being used quite equally. Can you remember what BF1 tops out at in terms of thread usage - how many can it use? I guess it's good if BF V can support more cores than BF 1.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2362
Joined: 2009-10-10
It runs pretty smooth, better than alpha build.