Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review
12-core Intel Core i9 7920X will get a 400 MHz slower base-clock
And I do need to add more text to that title line, as that is a 2.9 GHz base-clock compared to the 10-core Core i9 7900X. In late August you should be able to pickup the 12 core Core i9 7920X.
And that makes things interesting as I immediately want to compare towards Ryzen Threadripper here. AMDs 12-core part will have a 600 MHz faster base clock at 3.5 GHz (boost 4.0 GHz). Now that doesn't mean that the 12-core part from Intel will be slower, they do have more play in the turbo clocks of course. So time will tell what will be the better option. However looking at the recent power consumption numbers on the 10-core part, Intel can't go too wild on the boost frequencies.
Intel's 12-core Skylake-X based is to cost 1189 USD. The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is the 12-core counter-part, that base clock is a notch higher at 3.5 GHz with precision boost to 4.0 GHz, thus SKU will get 24 threads. This processor will retail for 799 USD. This info was spotted by Dutch HWI and is listed in the Intel price-list.
Eurocom Launches Laptop with 12-core Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 CPU - 11/21/2013 08:35 AM
Eurocom is launching the world's first 12 core / 24 thread Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 based 12lbs (5.5kg) Mobile Server Supercomputer-class laptop, the EUROCOM Panther 5SE. Intel's Xeon E5-26xx v2 techno...
Fermi yields are fine, 512-core version TBA - 04/29/2010 09:54 AM
DigiTimes had a chat with NVIDIA general manager of MCP business Drew Henry. When speaking about Fermi, Henry said rumors about yields being lower than 20 percent are completely untrue. He claims they...
AMD rolls out 12-core Magny Cours server processors - 03/30/2010 10:14 AM
AMD officially released its new Opteron 6000 "Magny Cours" processor series, which features world's first 8- and 12-core x86 processors for the high-volume 2P and value 4P server market. Pri...
AMD 12-core server chip pricing - 03/25/2010 11:06 AM
Information leaked onto the web regarding AMD's upcoming 12-core Opteron processors at the website of an online shop. The Opteron X12 6164 runs at 1.7GHz and has 16MB of cache and it costs $797, while...
AMD acknowledges 12-core CPU shipped early - 02/24/2010 12:51 PM
Last week we showed you some examples of 12-core processors from AMD being sold on eBAY. AMD's Director of Product Marketing for Server/Workstation John Fruehe admitted today that 12-core Opteron chip...
D3M1G0D
Senior Member
Posts: 2068
Joined: 2017-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 2068
Joined: 2017-03-10
#5453823 Posted on: 07/19/2017 05:13 PM
400 MHz is a pretty big drop, but it's not completely surprising. Judging by the thermals and power draw on the 7900X, it was very doubtful that they would be able to clock the 12 - 18 core parts anywhere near the 10-core one.
400 MHz is a pretty big drop, but it's not completely surprising. Judging by the thermals and power draw on the 7900X, it was very doubtful that they would be able to clock the 12 - 18 core parts anywhere near the 10-core one.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5453831 Posted on: 07/19/2017 05:37 PM
Even worse than I thought. And I already re-drawn bad image into pretty bad image.
Worst case scenario:
10 * 3.3GHz = 33GHz of relative performance
12 * 2.9GHz = 34.8GHz of relative performance
That's 5.5% increase of performance for 20.2% increase of price ($200).
What's left for 14 core chips and more? Or is this chip just place holder, so intel can say 12C are available and then there will be properly clocked 14C with huge price bump?
Considering how close this is in IPC to Ryzen and 12C TR having 20% base clock advantage... This is yet another weird chip I would like intel to explain.
Even worse than I thought. And I already re-drawn bad image into pretty bad image.
Worst case scenario:
10 * 3.3GHz = 33GHz of relative performance
12 * 2.9GHz = 34.8GHz of relative performance
That's 5.5% increase of performance for 20.2% increase of price ($200).
What's left for 14 core chips and more? Or is this chip just place holder, so intel can say 12C are available and then there will be properly clocked 14C with huge price bump?
Considering how close this is in IPC to Ryzen and 12C TR having 20% base clock advantage... This is yet another weird chip I would like intel to explain.
wavetrex
Senior Member
Posts: 2028
Joined: 2008-07-16
Senior Member
Posts: 2028
Joined: 2008-07-16
#5453868 Posted on: 07/19/2017 07:29 PM
This will be really fun after AMD releases Threadripper and reviews start to pop up showing it beats Intel's 12 and 10 cores soundly, while being cheaper than both.
I think of this when I imagine Intel's board of directors:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghzEd4WLUz4
This will be really fun after AMD releases Threadripper and reviews start to pop up showing it beats Intel's 12 and 10 cores soundly, while being cheaper than both.
I think of this when I imagine Intel's board of directors:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghzEd4WLUz4
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 8408
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 8408
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5453885 Posted on: 07/19/2017 07:59 PM
So...
20% more cores - 13% per core performance = 20% more expensive.
Or, in other words, if linear, 7% more performance for 20% more cost.
So...
20% more cores - 13% per core performance = 20% more expensive.
Or, in other words, if linear, 7% more performance for 20% more cost.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 121
Joined: 2015-12-10
going to be interesting to see the performance of those 2 compared side by side at stock and over clocked.