Enermax Aquafusion 360 review LCS
Intel Core i5 11400F processor review
Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro SL 3600 MHz 32GB review
ASRock Z590 Extreme review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC review
Corsair K70 RGB TKL keyboard review
Corsair RM650x (2021) power supply review
be quiet! Silent Loop 2 280mm review
Corsair K55 RGB PRO XT keyboard review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - March 2021
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
Posted by: on: 02/25/2021 04:00 PM [
56 comment(s) ]
NVIDIA has released another RTX 3000 series SKU onto the market, in this review, we check out the MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO, and yeah that's a non-Ti model. This Ampere GPU-based graphics card series is based on a very decent 12GB and has 3584 shading processors activated.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 15286
Senior Member
Posts: 15286
Posted on: 02/25/2021 04:16 PM
This is the worse x060 card generation in a recent memory. Vram configuration, performance, price are just awful. Nvidia just dosnt care. Hopefuly rx6700 series wont be such a disappointment.
This is the worse x060 card generation in a recent memory. Vram configuration, performance, price are just awful. Nvidia just dosnt care. Hopefuly rx6700 series wont be such a disappointment.
cucaulay malkin
Senior Member
Posts: 1450
Senior Member
Posts: 1450
Posted on: 02/25/2021 04:25 PM
why are you complaining about vram configuration for this ? 12g 192-bit is actually more than enough for a gpu this powerful and is the only saving grace for a gpu that barely beats 2060 super.
they're putting 256-bit on 6900xt and no one is complaining.
they wouldn't swindle me for either of those cards tho.
6700 is same 192-bit but half capacity.
This is the worse x060 card generation in a recent memory. Vram configuration, performance, price are just awful. Nvidia just dosnt care. Hopefuly rx6700 series wont be such a disappointment.
why are you complaining about vram configuration for this ? 12g 192-bit is actually more than enough for a gpu this powerful and is the only saving grace for a gpu that barely beats 2060 super.
they're putting 256-bit on 6900xt and no one is complaining.
they wouldn't swindle me for either of those cards tho.
6700 is same 192-bit but half capacity.
ezodagrom
Senior Member
Posts: 599
Senior Member
Posts: 599
Posted on: 02/25/2021 04:29 PM
Not much better than the 2060 Super/2070 and the power consumption is only slightly lower... Very disappointing performance/watt when taking into consideration the other 3000 series cards.
Not much better than the 2060 Super/2070 and the power consumption is only slightly lower... Very disappointing performance/watt when taking into consideration the other 3000 series cards.
Devid
Senior Member
Posts: 111
Senior Member
Posts: 111
Posted on: 02/25/2021 04:30 PM
I can agree with all of you, this card is disappointing...
Why the heck this card needed to come with this cut down memory configuration instead of keeping the 256bit/8GB?
This card should be called RTX 3050Ti
I can agree with all of you, this card is disappointing...
Why the heck this card needed to come with this cut down memory configuration instead of keeping the 256bit/8GB?
This card should be called RTX 3050Ti
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1450
disappointing card.
I checked computerbase and ppc for performance summary, they have 3060ti at 1.32x faster than this and 2070 super 1.12x faster.
first 106 die that loses so severely to previous nerfed 104. Even a cut-down 2060 left 1070ti behind. vram doesn't matter if performance is low.