MSI GeForce RTX 3050 Gaming X 8G review
ASUS ROG GeForce RTX 3050 STRIX OC review
Palit GeForce RTX 3050 DUAL OC review
Gigabyte RTX 3050 Gaming OC review
ASRock Z690 Taichi review
Radeon RX 6500 XT review
MSI Vigor GK71 Sonic keyboard review
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Suprim X 12GB review
TeamGroup A440 PRO Special 5eries 4TB NVMe review
Core i5 12400 processor review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
Posted by: on: 02/25/2021 04:00 PM [
56 comment(s) ]
NVIDIA has released another RTX 3000 series SKU onto the market, in this review, we check out the MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO, and yeah that's a non-Ti model. This Ampere GPU-based graphics card series is based on a very decent 12GB and has 3584 shading processors activated.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 17323
Senior Member
Posts: 17323
Posted on: 02/25/2021 04:16 PM
This is the worse x060 card generation in a recent memory. Vram configuration, performance, price are just awful. Nvidia just dosnt care. Hopefuly rx6700 series wont be such a disappointment.
This is the worse x060 card generation in a recent memory. Vram configuration, performance, price are just awful. Nvidia just dosnt care. Hopefuly rx6700 series wont be such a disappointment.
cucaulay malkin
Senior Member
Posts: 3666
Senior Member
Posts: 3666
Posted on: 02/25/2021 04:25 PM
why are you complaining about vram configuration for this ? 12g 192-bit is actually more than enough for a gpu this powerful and is the only saving grace for a gpu that barely beats 2060 super.
they're putting 256-bit on 6900xt and no one is complaining.
they wouldn't swindle me for either of those cards tho.
6700 is same 192-bit but half capacity.
This is the worse x060 card generation in a recent memory. Vram configuration, performance, price are just awful. Nvidia just dosnt care. Hopefuly rx6700 series wont be such a disappointment.
why are you complaining about vram configuration for this ? 12g 192-bit is actually more than enough for a gpu this powerful and is the only saving grace for a gpu that barely beats 2060 super.
they're putting 256-bit on 6900xt and no one is complaining.
they wouldn't swindle me for either of those cards tho.
6700 is same 192-bit but half capacity.
ezodagrom
Senior Member
Posts: 599
Senior Member
Posts: 599
Posted on: 02/25/2021 04:29 PM
Not much better than the 2060 Super/2070 and the power consumption is only slightly lower... Very disappointing performance/watt when taking into consideration the other 3000 series cards.
Not much better than the 2060 Super/2070 and the power consumption is only slightly lower... Very disappointing performance/watt when taking into consideration the other 3000 series cards.
Devid
Senior Member
Posts: 182
Senior Member
Posts: 182
Posted on: 02/25/2021 04:30 PM
I can agree with all of you, this card is disappointing...
Why the heck this card needed to come with this cut down memory configuration instead of keeping the 256bit/8GB?
This card should be called RTX 3050Ti
I can agree with all of you, this card is disappointing...
Why the heck this card needed to come with this cut down memory configuration instead of keeping the 256bit/8GB?
This card should be called RTX 3050Ti
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3666
disappointing card.
I checked computerbase and ppc for performance summary, they have 3060ti at 1.32x faster than this and 2070 super 1.12x faster.
first 106 die that loses so severely to previous nerfed 104. Even a cut-down 2060 left 1070ti behind. vram doesn't matter if performance is low.