Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 WIFI6E router review
Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review

New Downloads
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.24.193
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1994
GeForce 512.95 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.2 driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.70
FurMark Download v1.30
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.1
Download Samsung Magician v7.1.1.820
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1732
HWiNFO Download v7.24


New Forum Topics
Info Zone - gEngines, Ray Tracing, DLSS, DLAA, TSR, FSR, XeSS, DLDSR etc. Nvidia Shadercache setting. Rumor: Intel Raptor Lake and Sapphire Rapids processors will be available in October NVIDIA GeForce 512.95 WHQL driver download & Discussion Review: AMD Ryzen 5 5600 processor 512.95 - Clean Version Top Gun: Maverick add-on for Microsoft Flight Simulator is now available for free. [3rd-Party Driver] Amernime Zone Radeon Insight 22.5.1 WHQL Driver Pack (Released) A 500Hz refresh rate NVIDIA G-Sync compatible gaming LCD is in the works AMD changes its statements, Ryzen 7000 will consume up to 230W




Guru3D.com » Review » F1 2017: PC graphics performance benchmark review 5

F1 2017: PC graphics performance benchmark review 5

Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 09/08/2017 01:28 PM [ 16 comment(s) ]

Mercedes, Ferrari or Red Bull? We will look at Codemasters F1 2017 in a PC graphics performance and PC gamer way. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.

Read article


Advertisement



Tagged as: F1 2017 benchmarks, F1 2017 pc performance

« Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1080 FCAT Analysis · F1 2017: PC graphics performance benchmark review · Gigabyte Aorus K7 keyboard and M3 mouse review »

pages 1 2 3 4

anxious_f0x
Senior Member



Posts: 1751
Posted on: 09/08/2017 02:42 PM
I've been enjoying this game since launch, it's nice to see some benchmarks for a racing game, doesn't happen too often, thanks Hilbert :)

CrazY_Milojko
Senior Member



Posts: 2541
Posted on: 09/08/2017 02:44 PM
Thanks for the article HH!

How come RX 580 8GB outrun RX 480 8GB in 1080p by 9fps?o_O There shouldn't be 9 fps difference between these two cards, they're almost identical with a bit higher GPU clock on RX 580 side but almost 13% higher fps on RX 580 side, wtf!? Driver "optimizations" in favour of RX 580 cards?

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone



Posts: 43831
Posted on: 09/08/2017 03:08 PM
Thanks for the article HH!

How come RX 580 8GB outrun RX 480 8GB in 1080p by 9fps?o_O There shouldn't be 9 fps difference between these two cards, they're almost identical with a bit higher GPU clock on RX 580 side but almost 13% higher fps on RX 580 side, wtf!? Driver "optimizations" in favour of RX 580 cards?

Meeh, not entirely. The difference in-between 480 and 580 is roughly in the 10% mark thanks to boosting and the binned XTX GPUs. Account for a bit of anomalies (no racing lap reproduces 100% similar results due to random stuff happening) so that 12~13% differential makes sense. But sure it is a little on the high side.

Loophole35
Senior Member



Posts: 9800
Posted on: 09/08/2017 03:23 PM
Thanks for the article HH!

How come RX 580 8GB outrun RX 480 8GB in 1080p by 9fps?o_O There shouldn't be 9 fps difference between these two cards, they're almost identical with a bit higher GPU clock on RX 580 side but almost 13% higher fps on RX 580 side, wtf!? Driver "optimizations" in favour of RX 580 cards?

Meeh, not entirely. The difference in-between 480 and 580 is roughly in the 10% mark thanks to boosting and the binned XTX GPUs. Account for a bit of anomalies (no racing lap reproduces 100% similar results due to random stuff happening) so that 12~13% differential makes sense. But sure it is a little on the high side.

Could it be like what happened with Hawaii with the refresh getting favorable driver improvements over the older cards at first then performance coming in line later?

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone



Posts: 43831
Posted on: 09/08/2017 03:42 PM
Considering both are Polaris, I highly doubt that.

pages 1 2 3 4

Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.

Guru3D.com » Articles » F1 2017: PC graphics performance benchmark review 5

Guru3D.com © 2022