Corsair CX750F RGB (750W PSU) review
GeForce RTX 3090 Founder review
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X TRIO review
Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPRO OC review
Samsung 980 Pro 1TB NVMe SSD review
GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 SG review
Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GamingPro review
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING X TRIO review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 TUF Gaming review
GeForce RTX 3080 Founder review
EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 SC Gaming review
Posted by: on: 07/07/2016 08:24 AM [
20 comment(s) ]
We review the EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 SC (SuperClocked) Gaming armed with 8GB GDDR5 graphics memory. Now we all like the reference founders edition cards, but let's face it, aren't the proper board partner cards something we are all after?
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3 4
neddyk
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Posted on: 07/07/2016 08:51 AM
Hi Hilbert,
On the page with Grand Theft Auto V, the 1920x1080 benchmark is duplicated and no 2560x1440 results are shown.
Hi Hilbert,
On the page with Grand Theft Auto V, the 1920x1080 benchmark is duplicated and no 2560x1440 results are shown.
Solfaur
Senior Member
Posts: 7379
Senior Member
Posts: 7379
Posted on: 07/07/2016 09:53 AM
Why does this perform lower than the msi gaming 1070?
Even when you overclocked the EVGA higher than the MSI it performed worse than the MSI?
firestrike MSI vs Evga - 18384 vs 17774
Likely because the average boost on the MSI is a bit better. I too get ~18600 Graphics Score on mine when at stock clocks. And then ~20600 when OCed when the boost ranges from 2025 to 2063MHz and 9410MHz on memory. Also, iirc Hilbert put a +700 on memory for the MSI, whereas only +600 on this one.
Why does this perform lower than the msi gaming 1070?
Even when you overclocked the EVGA higher than the MSI it performed worse than the MSI?
firestrike MSI vs Evga - 18384 vs 17774
Likely because the average boost on the MSI is a bit better. I too get ~18600 Graphics Score on mine when at stock clocks. And then ~20600 when OCed when the boost ranges from 2025 to 2063MHz and 9410MHz on memory. Also, iirc Hilbert put a +700 on memory for the MSI, whereas only +600 on this one.
ReloadAO
Junior Member
Posts: 19
Junior Member
Posts: 19
Posted on: 07/07/2016 10:28 AM
Why is RX 480 missing from the charts?
Why is RX 480 missing from the charts?
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38963
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38963
Posted on: 07/07/2016 10:53 AM
Why does this perform lower than the msi gaming 1070?
Even when you overclocked the EVGA higher than the MSI it performed worse than the MSI?
firestrike MSI vs Evga - 18384 vs 17774
Still investigating. Ran the OC many times yet it seems to be stuck. I think it is stuck on a lower boost mode e.g. the power limiter kicks in due to the tweak being maybe a notch too high. This afternoon I'll re-do the overclocked bench on a fresh system to see if that made a chance. Also could be the new FM update from a couple of days ago. But I am checking it.
Updated: second run/check worked well. Firestrike OC results have been updated accordingly.
For the other question. RX 480 still need to be added to this data-set.
Why does this perform lower than the msi gaming 1070?
Even when you overclocked the EVGA higher than the MSI it performed worse than the MSI?
firestrike MSI vs Evga - 18384 vs 17774
Still investigating. Ran the OC many times yet it seems to be stuck. I think it is stuck on a lower boost mode e.g. the power limiter kicks in due to the tweak being maybe a notch too high. This afternoon I'll re-do the overclocked bench on a fresh system to see if that made a chance. Also could be the new FM update from a couple of days ago. But I am checking it.
Updated: second run/check worked well. Firestrike OC results have been updated accordingly.
For the other question. RX 480 still need to be added to this data-set.
pages 1 2 3 4
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 22
Why does this perform lower than the msi gaming 1070?
Even when you overclocked the EVGA higher than the MSI it performed worse than the MSI?
firestrike MSI vs Evga - 18384 vs 17774