Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 OLED monitor review
ASUS Radeon RX 7600 STRIX OC review
Corsair RM1200X SHIFT 1200W PSU Review
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X processor review




For our fourth and final Ryzen 7000 review, we take a look at the 12-core Ryzen 9 7900X. A processor that will be less popular due to its somewhat unusual core configuration, but make no mistake, it is a gaming and content creation beast.
Read article
Advertisement
« AMD Ryzen 5 7600X processor review · AMD Ryzen 9 7900X processor review
· ASUS Crosshair X670E HERO review »
pages 1 2 3 4 5
Embra
Senior Member
Posts: 1497
Senior Member
Posts: 1497
Posted on: 09/28/2022 02:52 PM
If I were upgrading, which I am not. .... This would be my choice to upgrade with.
I need the productivity performance, but my 5900x is doing fine for now.
If I were upgrading, which I am not. .... This would be my choice to upgrade with.
I need the productivity performance, but my 5900x is doing fine for now.
Valken
Senior Member
Posts: 2647
Senior Member
Posts: 2647
Posted on: 09/28/2022 03:54 PM
I've calm down a bit after blowing up on my team for stupid stuff at work today, and I've re-read all the Zen 4 reviews here again.
At productivity and most games, all the Zen 4 are at the top of the heap, except for some games where it ties at 1080p.
At 1440p and up, the selected games here are GPU limited.
I also look at the Linux based reviews where Zen 4 7950 and 7900 basically destroyed ADL at almost everything. That was a huge eye opener.
Value PER core, this is BETTER than 7700x or 7600x.
If not for the costs of DDR5-6000CL30 and new MB, all new system buyers should consider the Zen 4 CPU with cores to match their usage. IPC wise it is amazing and those PBO frequencies are amazing too.
My concerns are overall platform costs being WAY too high and maybe more in-depth OC tweaking is required including undervolting and RAM OC like, getting the CL down to 28 or 26 or lower. Would have been amazing to see undervolting and getting the 7600-7900 to PBO up to the same as the 7950 for example. I am sure there is a way to get close unless those chiplets have been relentlessly binned already.
I feel there is a lot of power left on the table but the rush to publish reviews these days have left it to set all core OC, measure the heat and be done with it.
I'm still gonna wait for the 7x00X3D, the one CPU to rule them all!
I've calm down a bit after blowing up on my team for stupid stuff at work today, and I've re-read all the Zen 4 reviews here again.
At productivity and most games, all the Zen 4 are at the top of the heap, except for some games where it ties at 1080p.
At 1440p and up, the selected games here are GPU limited.
I also look at the Linux based reviews where Zen 4 7950 and 7900 basically destroyed ADL at almost everything. That was a huge eye opener.
Value PER core, this is BETTER than 7700x or 7600x.
If not for the costs of DDR5-6000CL30 and new MB, all new system buyers should consider the Zen 4 CPU with cores to match their usage. IPC wise it is amazing and those PBO frequencies are amazing too.
My concerns are overall platform costs being WAY too high and maybe more in-depth OC tweaking is required including undervolting and RAM OC like, getting the CL down to 28 or 26 or lower. Would have been amazing to see undervolting and getting the 7600-7900 to PBO up to the same as the 7950 for example. I am sure there is a way to get close unless those chiplets have been relentlessly binned already.
I feel there is a lot of power left on the table but the rush to publish reviews these days have left it to set all core OC, measure the heat and be done with it.
I'm still gonna wait for the 7x00X3D, the one CPU to rule them all!
barbacot
Senior Member
Posts: 899
Senior Member
Posts: 899
Posted on: 09/28/2022 03:58 PM
Must be a mistake? Because 15 -20 seconds is still a lot compared to actual boot times.
...Once your memory is trained POST and thus boot times will ramp up as fast as expected at say 15 to 20 seconds max
Must be a mistake? Because 15 -20 seconds is still a lot compared to actual boot times.
Agonist
Senior Member
Posts: 4124
Senior Member
Posts: 4124
Posted on: 09/28/2022 06:31 PM
How long my x570 takes. I never use fast boot.
Must be a mistake? Because 15 -20 seconds is still a lot compared to actual boot times.
How long my x570 takes. I never use fast boot.
pages 1 2 3 4 5
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 4124
Damn this thing flies.
Wish I could go AM5 like I wanted too.
Thanks for all of those AM5 reviews.
Has too have been really busy past few days.