Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Sabrent Rocket 4 PLUS 2TB NVMe SSD review
MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT GAMING X TRIO review
Guru3D Q1 Winter 20/21 PC Buyer Guide
AOC CU34G2X monitor review

New Downloads
GeForce 461.72 WHQL driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5640 beta
CrystalDiskInfo 8.11.2 Download
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.2.3 driver download
GPU-Z Download v2.37.0
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH27.20.100.9313
HWiNFO Download v6.43 - 4380 Beta
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.2.2 driver download
3DMark Download v2.17.7137 + Time Spy
PCMark 10 Download v.2.1.2508


New Forum Topics
Review: ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC GeForce 461.72 WHQL drivers: download & discussion Any way to "Half-Refresh V-Sync" with AMD GPUs? Thanks! NVIDIA: Rainbow Six Siege Players Test NVIDIA Reflex and Two new DLSS Titles Cyberpunk 2077 postpones biggest patch v1.2 Review: MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO NASA Perseverance rover 200 MHZ CPU costs $200K AMD to announce Radeon RX 6700 Series upcoming March 3rd NVidia Anti-Aliasing Guide (updated) Asus laptop G733QS ryzen 5900HX rtx 3080 benchmarks




Guru3D.com » Review » Call of Duty: WW2: PC graphics analysis benchmark review » Page 4

Call of Duty: WW2: PC graphics analysis benchmark review - Graphics card performance 1080p

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 11/03/2017 12:18 PM [ 4] 31 comment(s)

Tweet

Graphics card performance

The game offers several quality settings and modes. At 1920x1080 even entry-level to mainstream graphics cards achieve very good frame-rates at the best possible settings. Visually there is little difference in-between the normal to the most complex mode settings. Let's start off with Full HD and roughly 20 graphics cards based on the quality settings we've shown you.

Note: We'll be testing in the scene where we fight through the trenches and need to destroy enemies and clear bunkers. This is a very representable level overall FPS wise for this game. If we'd be testing in the intro scene, the beach, the performance will easily drop ~30% due to intro scene complexity (huge amount of explosions, fire, shots, huge troop movement, and objects). So again, once you pass the beach, the framerates are far more on par and higher overall, which is what we present today as result set in these charts. This is a choice we made, please do be aware of the fact that there will be levels with significantly lower FPS, but also ones with much higher FPS. This is, and always has been, the nature of the COD series and its game rendering engine.

 

First off let me note that all graphics cards are based on reference clock frequencies or clocked at reference frequencies. Nvidia cards often are sold as AIB product with a much faster factory tweak (and extra 100~150 Mhz on the base clock is not unusual) that can result in say 10% additional performance over reference. For AMD card that typically is lower at a ~50 MHz increase. The type of game you play is always relevant though, a first-person shooter game is nice at 50 to 60 fps, an online shooter on a 144Hz monitor feels better at 100+ fps. And totally on the opposing side, for RPG gaming things are different for which we are comfortable with an FPS ranging as low as 30~35 FPS. For race-games I feel a minimum of 40 FPS average would be a good point to start. At all times if your framerate is low, you can opt to change in-game image quality settings. Again, mind you that we test with reference cards or cards that have been clocked at reference frequencies. But yeah, 1080p with any card ... not a problem. It was a little curious to notice that a lot of AMD cards all sit in the 90~100 FPS range. That could be driver / CPU bound related. Then again, these are excellent framerates regardless of that fact.




8 pages « 3 4 5 6 next »



Related Articles
Call of Duty: WW2: PC graphics analysis benchmark review
It's time to check out that PC release of Call of Duty: WW2 for Windows relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are bein...

Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare PC graphics benchmark review
It's that time of the year, Call of Duty in it's Infinite Warfare glory has been released. We will look at the game in our geeky gamer way. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards ...

Call of Duty: Black Ops III PC graphics performance benchmark review
It is that time of the year again, we take out a dozen or so graphics cards and benchmark Call of Duty: Black Ops III. Join us in this article where many graphics cards are being tested with the new t...

Call of Duty Advanced Warfare VGA graphics performance benchmark review
It is that time of the year again, we take out a dozen or so graphics cards and benchmark Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare. Join us in this article where many graphics cards are being tested with the ne...

© 2021