Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Editorials
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Dated content
    • More Categories
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Knowledgebase
    • Search articles
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • SEARCH
    • Search Articles
    • Search News
    • Search Files
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
Metro Last Light VGA Graphics Benchmark performance test
Noctua NH-U12S and NH-U14S review
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU Mini review
OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD review
Cooler Master Eisberg 240L Prestige review
Guru3D and OCZ Contest - PC Power 1200W PSU Giveaway
MSI GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST OC review
ASUS ROG ORION PRO Gaming Headset Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - April 2013

New Downloads
GPU-Z Download 0.7.1
HWiNFO32 4.18 Download
HWiNFO64 4.18 Download
GeForce 320.14 BETA Driver Download
Nvidia Lifelike Human Face Rendering Tech Demo Download
3DMark Download v1.1.0
XBMC Media Center Download 12.0 2
RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download v5.1.1
AS SSD Benchmark Download v1.7.4739.38088
AMD Catalyst Application Profile Download 13.4 CAP1


New Forum Topics
by: Stone Gargoyle Xbox World reveals Next Gen Xbox?by: scoter man1 A basic rigby: Stoja AMD Catalyst 13.5 beta 3 Mobility Driverby: aircool Battlefield 3 (Official Thread) Pt. 3by: PhazeDelta1 Resident Evil 6 Benchmarkby: leiff spdif coax splitter?by: Ralph Kerbal Space Programby: Andrew Neilson Replacment for dogy Nvidia cards in ATIby: roller344 Gtx 680 performling like ****by: Hilbert Hagedoorn 10 percent of notebooks have a touchscreen


Online Users
There are currently 1621 user(s) online:
Google, JonasBeckman, MamaLuigi, Memorian, mf_y2k, MSN, PlayN@Home, TwoPlusTwo, Yahoo


Guru3D.com » Review » OCZ Vertex TURBO SSD review test » Page 3

OCZ Vertex TURBO SSD review test

Posted by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 08/16/2009 01:00 PM [ 0 comment(s) ]

Solid State Drives 101
Tweet


Solid State Drives 101

Next to the development of multi-core CPU technology and the evolution of the GPU, one of the technologies growing extremely fast is SSD drive technology. It's such a booming market and it just doesn't stop evolving.

Merely 4-5 years ago I had this 256MB flash-drive writing at 400KB/sec, that was the sickest piece of technology in terms of volume and speed. Once the development reached a volume size of 1GB, things really took off. 1, 2, 4, 8, 32 and 64 GB flash drives are now considered normal. Who does not have a 4GB flash-USB stick, for example?

One of the culprits of flash memory was often related to the read/write speed. And thanks to multi-channel controller innovations inside flash memory units last year, the trend of flash-drives or Solid State Drives really pushed through.

The alarmingly fast move towards solid-state hard drives (SSD) for notebooks, PCs and servers seems like a rather exciting development at first glance. Unlike their mechanical counterparts, which have spindle motors, rotating platters and read/write heads, the solid-state drives consist of flash memory chips and have no moving parts whatsoever. The benefits that these drives offer compared to a mechanical drive are numerous.

The weakness however is that SSDs were intensely expensive. We are now in 2009, and never, ever has a technology developed so fast in terms of speed and reliability versus the money you need to pay for it. And though value is a very relative thing, the first SSD drives, price wise, are finally competing with the fastest HDDs and are slowly moving onto a competitive level.

Before we go deeper into the review, I wanted to chat with you a little about what precisely the difference between the traditional HDD (hard disk drive) and all new SSD is. When we look at the HDD we receive a big bulky mechanical chunk of technology; they have spindle motors, rotating magnetic platters and read/write heads. Solid-state drives however consist of flash memory chips and have no moving parts whatsoever, which is a tremendous gain.

In this year and age, solid state disks (SSDs) are typically faster than regular disks because there is zero latency (the read/write head does not need to move anymore). Next to that, flash memory can be addressed in multiple channels. Look at that as internal RAID, and it improves speed tremendously. This year we have already seen SSD drives topping 250 MB/s read speeds and 200 MB/s write speeds, and these numbers keep changing every month.

SSDs are also more sturdy than hard disks and offer greater protection in hostile environments. As a result, they may also be used in desktop computers and even servers in dangerous locations.

The difference between SLC and MLC

All flash memory is not created equal. There are 2 main types, SLC and MLC:

SLC and MLC (single and multi level cells) SLC stores one bit per cell, MLC doubles it. MLC - we see a lot in flash-memories used for example in your digital camera. If we break it down:

  • SLC is faster, and has around 10,000 up-to 1 million write cycles
  • MLC is somewhat slower but cheaper, unfortunately also less reliable (sometimes as few as 10,000 write cycles).

And that's where we land at limited write cycles. The reality is that you purchase a SSD drive on borrowed time. By its very nature, flash memory cells can resist only so many write cycles before they are prone to failure.

Typically SLC flash storage will wear out after hundreds of thousands of write cycles, while high endurance flash storage is often marketed with an endurance of 1-5 million write cycles.

Special file systems or firmware designs mitigate this problem by spreading writes over the entire device (so-called wear leveling), rather than rewriting files in one place. Wear leveling is designed to prevent rewriting the same cell constantly. Pretty much: data is constantly spread out over the entire drive so that all cells will be written equally over time. Wear leveling isn't done in hardware, it is done in firmware on the SSD. It will spread the writes over the whole range of the NAND storage, so you can't really wear out one area while the rest stayed untouched.

At this very moment the life-span of a typical SSD drive MTBF (Mean Time Before Failure) is 1,500,000 to 2,000,000 hours, and honestly .. that number means just nothing. Fact is, we just do not know how long a drive will last or how long it'll take before it wears out.

The limited write cycles is per cell, not per disk, and all controllers have had wear leveling (using different cells) for a few years now. Any "bad" cell will be mapped out just like a bad block on a hard drive (transparently).

MLC lifespan then, how long will it really last? Well, only the future will tell .. However, with modern flash technology and error correction, the reliability of the drive in a PC could exceed 10 years with normal usage. This remains a gamble though. Most manufacturers will therefore grant a two year warranty. We would very much like to see a 5 year warranty from manufacturers, there's nothing worse than data-loss. If the industry makes a commitment, we as consumers would certainly feel more confident in purchasing an SSD.





12 pages « 2 3 4 5 next »


Guru3D.com » Articles » OCZ Vertex TURBO SSD review test » Page 3

Related Articles
OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD review
In this article we test, benchmark and review the OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD. What a great and fast piece of technology this is. An 20nm NAND flash SSD that is speedy and actually amongst the the rest of the devices tested, but also mroe affordable. Head on over into the review.

OCZ Vertex 4 SSD review with 1.5 firmware
We retest the OCZ Vertex 4 SSD yet now with 1.5 firmware update. , again bringing more performance towards the Vertex 4 series of SSDs. And albeit the difference is not as big as the 1.4 release was, it certainly makes a difference as this article will show you.

OCZ Vertex 4 SSD revisited with FW 1.4RC review
We revisit the OCZ Vertex 4 256 and 512GB SSD review, this time with Firmware 1.4 which makes the drives much faster. Armed with a new Indilinx Everest 2 controller this SSD is advertised as one of the fastest on the block with screaming IOPs performance. Lets have a look shall we ?

OCZ Vertex 4 SSD review
We review the OCZ Vertex 4 256 and 512GB SSD. Armed with a new Indilinx Everest 2 controller this SSD is advertised as one of the fastest on the block with screaming IOPs performance. Lets have a look shall we ?

Follow Guru3D on Google+ - Facebook - YouTube - Twitter © 2013