#5747862

warlord

2020-01-05 11:17

They are gonna fry our brains.

#5747865

Loobyluggs

2020-01-05 11:47

one. point. twentyone-jiggawatts??? It can't be done...

#5747874

Mesab67

2020-01-05 12:43

Loobyluggs:

one. point. twentyone-jiggawatts??? It can't be done...

...not in 1955. I'm afraid you're stuck here!

#5747897

kcajjones

2020-01-05 13:58

And so the ridiculous naming scheme begins again! By 2025... New WiFi 6.275.4ehgd at the 6.1465ghz band. On a more serious note. So this requires entirely new routers and end user devices, not just firmware updates, right?

#5747910

kruno

2020-01-05 15:39

kcajjones:

And so the ridiculous naming scheme begins again! By 2025... New WiFi 6.275.4ehgd at the 6.1465ghz band. On a more serious note. So this requires entirely new routers and end user devices, not just firmware updates, right?

Yes , and another antenna for 6 GHz operations

#5747948

slyphnier

2020-01-05 19:11

compared to 5G which is planned above 6Ghz mostly (at 26/28Ghz?, planned up to 39Ghz) https://www.gsma.com/spectrum/resources/26-ghz-28-ghz/ ... cmiiw so if people saying 5G is safe, then this no need to mention about its safety 'till it cause some issue with themselves or environment, then people themselves will uproar about it... human history been like that rinse and repeat

#5748071

Octopuss

2020-01-06 10:48

I'm not sure if it will be of any use in denser settlements, because if most of the ISPs migrate to this technology, there will be some insane crosstalk just like it is with current 2,4 and 5GHz frequencies.