Threadripper 3000 CPUs Not Likely Compatible with X399 motherboards
Click here to post a comment for Threadripper 3000 CPUs Not Likely Compatible with X399 motherboards on our message forum
asturur
asturur
asturur
they explained the argument, big changes in memory controller. We can argue that is not true, but i see no reason to upgrade from a 64 thread ryzen 2000 to a 64 thread ryzen 3000 without getting all the possible improvements.
Also is easier to seel mb + cpu + ram rather than cpu only
moo100times
D3M1G0D
If true, this certainly sucks for current TR owners. Like others here, I've been hoping to upgrade to the new Threadripper on my current board. Of course AMD didn't say much on socket TR4 compatibility, but we were all hoping it would be similar to AM4.
If a new socket is needed, I hope it comes with decent specs. Octa-channel memory and 64 PCIe 4.0 lanes might do the trick (admittedly, it is a bit awkward for the consumer line to have PCIe 4.0 while HEDT is still on PCIe 3.0). In other words, if we need to shell out for a new board, let's hope it's worth it.
screwtech02
vbetts
Moderator
Wow guys, can we not turn this into reee amd good INTEL BAD reeeee thread?
BReal85
schmidtbag
The weird thing is I thought TR4 was going to be more likely to have backward compatibility, due to it being based on a server socket (which tend to be LTS), and, because there's only 1 chipset (meaning, a lot less debugging to do). Anyone know about backward compatibility with the Zen2 Epycs? Because I'm sure TR would follow the same pattern.
I would think that if you need complete compatibility with the 3000 series, you'll need an X399 chipset.
Why not just go for Epyc? It's a lot cheaper if you get the models that aren't multi-socket compatible. I'm sure the outdated 24 and 32 core models must have dropped a lot in price.
D3M1G0D
MegaFalloutFan
Excellent News for me.