Scorn "Xbox Series X" trailer actually ran on a Ryzen processor and GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Scorn "Xbox Series X" trailer actually ran on a Ryzen processor and GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/267/267641.jpg
Its funny, they did not show any game, just some ingame video and not on real HW.. but he knows that it will run on target console 4k 60 FPS. Remember PS3 lauch videos and new lod (lots of ducks) system?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/132/132389.jpg
This isn't quite as outrageous as past BS like it. The XBSX's GPU, in reality, will be much more powerful than the PS5's (iT's OnLy 0.00000000000000001% MoRe dErPfLoPs ThAn tHe Ps5's! - Sony shill. STFU), with actual optimization instead of negative optimization like we get on intentionally crippled PC ports, that puts it not-a-galaxy-away from 2080 Ti performance like would be expected in the past. I expect the game on XBSX to actually look halfway that good, which is a shame, because I find H.R. Giger's style to be viscerally disgusting.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115462.jpg
Damn, somehow this game slipped right past me so far. Now that I've seen the trailer though, I'm interested!
data/avatar/default/avatar06.webp
Neo Cyrus:

This isn't quite as outrageous as past BS like it. The XBSX's GPU, in reality, will be much more powerful than the PS5's (iT's OnLy 0.00000000000000001% MoRe dErPfLoPs ThAn tHe Ps5's! - Sony shill. STFU), with actual optimization instead of negative optimization like we get on intentionally crippled PC ports, that puts it not-a-galaxy-away from 2080 Ti performance like would be expected in the past. I expect the game on XBSX to actually look halfway that good, which is a shame, because I find H.R. Giger's style to be viscerally disgusting.
Do you have any proof to back that up? As far as we’ve seen it’s 10.28 Tflops and 36 CU’s at 2.23Ghz for the PS5 vs ~12 Tflops, 52 CU’s and 1.825Ghz. The PS5 compensates with extra core clock and the XBSX has a bunch of CU’s extra and and a tad higher Tflops which I doubt will make a meaningful difference especially with IO speed in mind where the PS5 is almost double as fast. It’s all speculation, but I highly doubt we’ll see a lot of performance difference other than some small graphical changes in favor of one or the other console depending on which one will handle the specific workload the best. Don’t get me even started on the XBSX game lineup.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/189/189438.jpg
Well the game has been in the making for over 5 years and graphics hardware has changed quite a bit since the pre-alpha demo but in the pre-alpha the game play looked very slow, a lot of running and sneaking a round and puzzle solving, the early demo reminded me of Prey but with less shooting and slightly twisted sick visuals.....sick in a good way.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/232/232349.jpg
Ah yes. The old smoke and mirrors trick.
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
tunaphish6:

With the exception that it's deceptive and ingenuousness. For every person that is transparent and upfront about the capabilities of both games and consoles, there are probably a dozen or so others that are willing to keep quiet and deceive consumers. Sometimes it's blatant--like a video game's scene. Sometimes its malicious, like toting the features of an upcoming console, only have to have said features evaporate when it actually hit the market. The industry is long overdue for a healthy of regulation, and will never get one despite it being a multi-billion, if not trillion dollar industry.
You really should get into the habit of proof reading your posts my man. Could have been a great argument, minus the non sensical portions.