#5944345

Mufflore

2021-09-06 11:59

Damn, thats gonna take a big screen to view!

#5944347

0blivious

2021-09-06 12:04

"Put that on the main viewer and magnify."

#5944355

lmimmfn

2021-09-06 13:19

Enhance..... enhance!

#5944359

anticupidon

2021-09-06 13:33

We will spy on ya' even better, with so much detail! 😉:p /J /S

#5944394

Silva

2021-09-06 16:20

Mufflore:

Damn, thats gonna take a big screen to view!

Taking into account 8K is less than 34MP, pushing big MP count is just marketing at this point. I'm more interested in better low light and auto focus performance.

#5944398

Mufflore

2021-09-06 16:55

Silva:

Taking into account 8K is less than 34MP, pushing big MP count is just marketing at this point. I'm more interested in better low light and auto focus performance.

Oh I agree, I'd like to see the lense capable of passing that resolution to this sensor without loss or distortion. It will of course never happen. My comment was a bit of fun 🙂

#5944429

vestibule

2021-09-06 20:44

Hmm. sounds tasty. looking forward to this being reviewed. Hope it come with a zeiss lens.

#5944488

Valken

2021-09-07 06:40

I want to see multiple lens stitched to create those huge zoom in pictures... It's like real life Where's Waldo. Yes, I am a pixel peeper especially with wildlife or urban photography!

#5944969

geogan

2021-09-08 22:54

The smaller the photocells the worse the light gathering ability in low light. Using some sort of array of these and then averaging the reported values somehow to filter out noise would make sense, which is presumably what would be done here. There is the always existing problem of inter-cell gaps though which gets worse as cells get smaller as it takes up a greater percentage of overall area.