Ryzen 7000X3D with 100 MB of cache already planned for this year

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Ryzen 7000X3D with 100 MB of cache already planned for this year on our message forum
data/avatar/default/avatar25.webp
It feels a bit weird to have a replacement CPU for Zen4 already a few months later. Does that mean gamers should just not buy the first wave of Zen4 at all, if the wait is only such a short time? Also, what about a mix of gaming and productivity, eg. those of us that have a 5950, will we also get 3D Cache, or is the CPU too hot for that?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242134.jpg
@Agonist you will have 10 times higher (neg) impact on latencies from internet/server than anything. newer tech doesn't really need high fps anymore, if gpu capabilities are properly implemented . e.g. i can reach below 7ms/3ms rendering latency in Siege, all on 60hz, while my friends 144hz doesn't do anything better regarding lag. @schmidtbag nope . as amd stated, its for gaming "only", and 8 cores and up are usually what content ppl buy, so i don't see it making any sense for them to implement fps gaining stuff on (not commonly used) non gaming cpus like 7900 and 7950. if they wanted that, there would be 5900/5950 with V cache
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/165/165326.jpg
I'm really looking forward to this new amd 7xxx cpus with 3D cache , they will be fast , very fast for gaming 🙂
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/245/245459.jpg
Nice, I'm needing a new platform (to replace 6700K), and I really like the approach of the 3D V-Cache - not too much power used but best or near best gaming performance. I strongly see myself going with the 7800X3D after being with Intel since forever!
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/245/245459.jpg
fry178:

@TheDeeGee while above 60hz it gets smoother, most buy it to reduce input lag. usually around 15-30ms i common, but using Nv reflex/gpu scheduling in 10, and using input lag reduction, you can get it doen to 8ms and less (depends if its cpu or gpu). biggest gain would be a screen using some sort of sync, possibly reducing it further, but definitely helps with fps drop/stutter, and makes for smoother play.
Most people buy high Hz monitors for reduced motion blur and increased gaming awareness, not really the reduced input lag, as the difference between 240Hz and 500Hz is only worth a theoretical 2ms reduction in "human reaction time" (because 240Hz is a new frame every 4ms, and 500Hz is a new frame every 2ms)......even going from 144Hz to 240Hz you only gain 3ms.......and that is just immaterial & dwarfed when compared to human reaction speed which is somewhere between 150 - 250ms depending on individual. So high Hz screens are really instead about reduction of motion blur and increased information to the gamer (more "snapshots" in fast moving situations).
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/186/186763.jpg
JamesSneed:

AMD officially said it will be this year. I tend to believe it as it is the counter to Intel and timing wise its perfect for that.
Maybe if its literally only on one SKU like 5800X was. Otherwise why would anyone buy Zen4 without it? They aren't going to release Zen4 then 1 month later release Zen4 with v cache almost everyone would just wait. Zen4 will be out before Raptor Lake, they wont need to counter. Meteor Lake is ages away, v cache would make a nice update March/April time next year if its across the whole product stack. If they do launch it along with Zen4 I'd expect a sizeable price premium, like £100 more than its v cache less counter part
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/201/201426.jpg
TheDeeGee:

Ye, see i'm casual and don't do competitive gaming.
Sim racing and competitive gaming are totally different things. Offline sim racing is a huge thing.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/201/201426.jpg
fry178:

@Agonist you will have 10 times higher (neg) impact on latencies from internet/server than anything. newer tech doesn't really need high fps anymore, if gpu capabilities are properly implemented . e.g. i can reach below 7ms/3ms rendering latency in Siege, all on 60hz, while my friends 144hz doesn't do anything better regarding lag. @schmidtbag nope . as amd stated, its for gaming "only", and 8 cores and up are usually what content ppl buy, so i don't see it making any sense for them to implement fps gaining stuff on (not commonly used) non gaming cpus like 7900 and 7950. if they wanted that, there would be 5900/5950 with V cache
ROFL, you have 0 clue. Just stop. Sims don't rely on server for physics update to update client movent. But hey tell me that I don't feel a better response on input with higher refresh rate to what i am visually seeing on screen, hearing and feeling in the wheel as well. Everything is totally different in FPS and esports games vs sim racing and things are done. We really even more on input lag reduction then FPS people do.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
how can people not understand what racing games are ?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270008.jpg
Matt26LFC:

Maybe if its literally only on one SKU like 5800X was. Otherwise why would anyone buy Zen4 without it? They aren't going to release Zen4 then 1 month later release Zen4 with v cache almost everyone would just wait. Zen4 will be out before Raptor Lake, they wont need to counter. Meteor Lake is ages away, v cache would make a nice update March/April time next year if its across the whole product stack. If they do launch it along with Zen4 I'd expect a sizeable price premium, like £100 more than its v cache less counter part
People will by Ryzen 7000 even if 3D cache versions are coming. The 3D cache version will likely be $100 more than the non 3D part. AMD are launching Zen4 early in September so we are talking 3-4 months later for the 3D cache parts. Raptor Lake should land around November which might be very competitive or even better than Zen4 in single threaded or low threaded workloads. So yes AMD will want to counter that with the 3D cache version very shortly after.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270008.jpg
schmidtbag:

I would hope they don't, in that it will add unnecessary expense to CPUs that will not really take advantage of it. The way I see it, the V-cache is really just meant to compensate for what otherwise could have been additional memory channels. You pay a little extra for the CPU but you can get by with only 1 or 2 DIMMs and still get plenty of performance with good latency. I see the V-cache as necessary for 8+ core models, since (generally speaking) each additional core will demand more bandwidth, and AMD wants to remove RAM as a potential bottleneck. Now, if APUs could get this kind of cache, that would be fantastic.
Will have to see. DDR5 has two sub channels per channel which should help out with latencies quite a bit. I suspect the extra cache sill helps games just not as much with DDR5 as some of the bottleneck will already be lifted.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/245/245459.jpg
Matt26LFC:

Maybe if its literally only on one SKU like 5800X was. Otherwise why would anyone buy Zen4 without it? They aren't going to release Zen4 then 1 month later release Zen4 with v cache almost everyone would just wait. Zen4 will be out before Raptor Lake, they wont need to counter. Meteor Lake is ages away, v cache would make a nice update March/April time next year if its across the whole product stack. If they do launch it along with Zen4 I'd expect a sizeable price premium, like £100 more than its v cache less counter part
Well, if we think back to the 5800X3D, then that chip had overclocking disabled, and also it didn't boost as high in clockspeed, so the 3D V Cache chips don't perform as well as the standard chips when it comes to productivity, really mostly it's only in gaming that the 3D V Cache chips have the advantage. Following is a cut & paste from a review: https://overclock3d.net/reviews/cpu_mainboard/amd_ryzen_7_5800x3d_vs_ryzen_7_5800x/1 "Well as we've seen from our review of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D it is a processor that has been designed specifically with the 3D V-Cache on top of the CPU die, to give the fastest possible response in random requests. Random requests, things that cannot be predicted, are the cornerstone of gaming responsiveness and the all-important frames per second. This design, however, has meant that AMD have had to limit what you can do with the Ryzen 7 5800X3D and how high it will boost of its own accord." So I think it only really makes sense for just gamers to bother to buy the 3D V Cache versions, as otherwise they'd get better performance in addition to overclocking options by using the standard chips. EDIT: and the 3D V Cache versions are likely gonna be more expensive than their standard chip brothers, so it's a double negative whammy if you're not a gamer.......but a big positive whammy if you're a gamer!
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/186/186763.jpg
JamesSneed:

People will by Ryzen 7000 even if 3D cache versions are coming. The 3D cache version will likely be $100 more than the non 3D part. AMD are launching Zen4 early in September so we are talking 3-4 months later for the 3D cache parts. Raptor Lake should land around November which might be very competitive or even better than Zen4 in single threaded or low threaded workloads. So yes AMD will want to counter that with the 3D cache version very shortly after.
For some reason I thought Zen4 was coming end of October and Raptor November, but if it is indeed early Sept I can see V cache variants coming December or early Q1 2023 as opposed to late Q1
data/avatar/default/avatar18.webp
It would be really really annoying if the better cache is not available for the top end 7950X. That would be the perfect hybrid gaming/workstation CPU for game development... Maybe by the time it's available DDR5 will be available with reasonable latencies aswell.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270008.jpg
Matt26LFC:

For some reason I thought Zen4 was coming end of October and Raptor November, but if it is indeed early Sept I can see V cache variants coming December or early Q1 2023 as opposed to late Q1
They are gearing up for an early September launch. Its leaking out all over the place now because AIB's are already mass-producing parts.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258688.jpg
I must have missed where AMD lost its "market dominance"...;) (Can't quite recall that event, *cough*) Anyway, I've been amazed watching how many times AMD has stocked and then sold out its 5800X3d CPUs on the US AMD Store site. Since the day the CPU was first announced, I've counted ~6 (maybe 7) total sellouts and restocks. Latest sellout of 5800X3D was just a day or two ago, but it had only been restocked 1 or two days before that! Once it took AMD 7 days to replenish the AMD Store stock, but then they sold out of those, too! (Checked again now--sold out!) Bottom line is that I think AMD is going to continue to sell every X3D CPU it can manufacture for the foreseeable future. The rest of the year is shaping up nicely so far. They seem to clearly understand how compelling the X3D CPUs are--I think the demand and popularity has surprised them a bit--exceeded their expectations.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/273/273678.jpg
waltc3:

I must have missed where AMD lost its "market dominance"...;) (Can't quite recall that event, *cough*) Anyway, I've been amazed watching how many times AMD has stocked and then sold out its 5800X3d CPUs on the US AMD Store site. Since the day the CPU was first announced, I've counted ~6 (maybe 7) total sellouts and restocks. Latest sellout of 5800X3D was just a day or two ago, but it had only been restocked 1 or two days before that! Once it took AMD 7 days to replenish the AMD Store stock, but then they sold out of those, too! (Checked again now--sold out!) Bottom line is that I think AMD is going to continue to sell every X3D CPU it can manufacture for the foreseeable future. The rest of the year is shaping up nicely so far. They seem to clearly understand how compelling the X3D CPUs are--I think the demand and popularity has surprised them a bit--exceeded their expectations.
AMD doesn't have market dominance in any segment. It has never had market dominance in any segment. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/247515315825672203/989741893426491463/unknown.png
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/273/273323.jpg
[youtube=sw97hj18OUE] Wow, apparently the 5800X3D had a huge uplift in 1% lows for a lot of games. It seems it's effectively overcoming certain memory bottlenecks? The increase in certain titles was a high was 40-50% and the average 1% low increase was 22%, that's bonkers. Zen 4 chips with X3D variants are going to be incredible for gaming seems like.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Picolete:

Changes from game to game, Flight simulator seems to love cache
All games love cache [youtube=qnOsm568tAU]
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/268/268248.jpg
TheDeeGee:

I'm so glad to be stuck in the 60Hz range, games look smooth to me cuz i don't know any better (don't need to know either) and it saves me tons of money on expensive hardware.
I was scoffing on my monitors 48 to 75hz range . While I can not tell the difference between 60fps locked and 75 , enabling freesync with fps cap at 75 Hz it gives you a good leway you do not have to lock 60 your fps can from to 50 fps or so for a second or two and you will have no stuttering etc witch is nice !