Rumor: GeForce RTX 3060 to have 4864 shader cores?

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Rumor: GeForce RTX 3060 to have 4864 shader cores? on our message forum
data/avatar/default/avatar37.webp
Dragam1337:

Read reply #11 again... "Yes, the various segments has taken a price hike... but you still compare them model to model..." Yes, nvidia is charging more money for everything. Deal with it.
Stop getting so upset. Nvidia still covers all price segments like they've always done. What is it that's so hard to comprehend about that?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248994.jpg
If it's 6GB of VRAM, it's totally out of the question for me. My dusty old current card from years ago already has 8GB. That being said, I won't believe it's going to have only 6GB of memory before the official specs from Nvidia.
data/avatar/default/avatar21.webp
Kaarme:

If it's 6GB of VRAM, it's totally out of the question for me. My dusty old current card from years ago already has 8GB. That being said, I won't believe it's going to have only 6GB of memory before the official specs from Nvidia.
Honestly it sounds very likely... nvidia always does this.
data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp
Pinstripe:

Stop getting so upset. Nvidia still covers all price segments like they've always done. What is it that's so hard to comprehend about that?
Yep, so you will just have to get a lower end model, if your budget is limited to 300 USD. So stop crying about it.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/280/280231.jpg
Pinstripe:

And? XSX will be supplied with 4K res textures, XSS will be lower. There's a autodelivery system. Lower texture means lower VRAM and bandwidth requirements. Or do you think that lion's market share of FullHD gamers will suddenly switch to 4K gaming? Microsoft also has to think of it's PC ecosystem, and not everyone is gonna go out and buy high-end 12GB cards. Those 6GB 300 bucks cards will outsell anything else Nvidia puts out.
You know that you can buy TV for less than 299€ nowadays right? A cheap 4k TV costs as much as Xbox series S on average. It is not excuse. Games aren't free. Only 1% of console gamers use hdr in a resolution smaller than 4k. Everything is a fiasco for me.
data/avatar/default/avatar26.webp
Dragam1337:

Yep, so you will just have to get a lower end model, if your budget is limited to 300 USD. So stop crying about it.
I'm not the one crying. Read my first post. That's exactly what I purported. Are you done now being all sulky and stupid?
data/avatar/default/avatar28.webp
itpro:

You know that you can buy TV for less than 299€ nowadays right? A cheap 4k TV costs as much as Xbox series S on average. It is not excuse. Games aren't free. Only 1% of console gamers use hdr in a resolution smaller than 4k. Everything is a fiasco for me.
Have you ever checked those Steam Hardware surveys? 4K gaming is still miniscule there. And the economy isn't exactly brilliant either. Anything else you feel like you need to fight over with?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/280/280231.jpg
Pinstripe:

Have you ever checked those Steam Hardware surveys? 4K gaming is still miniscule there. And the economy isn't exactly brilliant either. Anything else you feel like you need to fight over with?
What is steam? Who knows steam? Who knows Valve? Who is Gabe Newell? Move on with nobodies please. I do not care for shady surveys. They could even shove in my throat that people plays at 720p. And we are talking about consoles here, not pc. Even elderly people achieved to buy cheap 4k TVs under 500$. 4k is mainstream for most users. New channels, faster internet, better signal reception. Only monitors are mostly stuck in 1080p. OK now?
data/avatar/default/avatar36.webp
Pinstripe:

I'm not the one crying. Read my first post. That's exactly what I purported. Are you done now being all sulky and stupid?
You said that models should be compared based on price - which they shouldn't. They should be compared directly to the model they replace. Price points change, and that's just tough luck if you are poor.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Pinstripe:

And then there is the Xbox Series S which will likely only dedicate 4GB of VRAM. Only "dumbasses", aka the majority, would buy those, right? 6GB will be fine with medium settings and Sampler Feedback.
399$ for medium setttings? Where has this world come to.
data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp
Undying:

399$ for medium setttings? Where has this world come to.
No, you'll get 8 GB and "High" settings for that. That is what the world has come to. I.e. same as every generation.
data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp
itpro:

What is steam? Who knows steam? Who knows Valve? Who is Gabe Newell? Move on with nobodies please. I do not care for shady surveys. They could even shove in my throat that people plays at 720p. And we are talking about consoles here, not pc. Even elderly people achieved to buy cheap 4k TVs under 500$. 4k is mainstream for most users. New channels, faster internet, better signal reception. Only monitors are mostly stuck in 1080p. OK now?
No, we're talking about a PC graphics card here, not about TV's or consoles. Perhaps you should go to NeoGAF for that.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/280/280231.jpg
Pinstripe:

No, we're talking about a PC graphics card here, not about TV's or consoles. Perhaps you should go to NeoGAF for that.
You said vram is enough. Xbox series s is failing because it has no vram/ram. Yet you brought it as an excuse for nvidia wanting to give new 6gb gpu in 2020. Full HD pc master race huh, u mad bro? 😎
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/280/280231.jpg
Undying:

399$ for medium setttings? Where has this world come to.
And they will be very happy about it. Market is a fail, consumerism is failing. We have either those who are willing to give 1500 or 300. Most average users are victims in between those price tags and buyers.
data/avatar/default/avatar33.webp
itpro:

You said vram is enough. Xbox series s is failing because it has no vram/ram. Yet you brought it as an excuse for nvidia wanting to give new 6gb gpu in 2020. Full HD pc master race huh, u mad bro? 😎
What? Series S is failing? What are you babbling on about now? And what excuse? That GA106 chip that was leaked months ago by @kopite7kimi is purported to have a 192bit bis interface. Now do the math. That will translate into 6 (and maybe later 12GB) models. You think Nvidia will just sell products that will leave customers screwed? And if you think 8GB isn't enough either... well tough luck for those RTX 3070 customers.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/197/197287.jpg
Undying:

399$ for medium setttings? Where has this world come to.
To be fair, it should relatively be expected that if you're not paying highest price for a GPU, you shouldn't be getting highest quality in games with at least current and most future graphically intensive games. Obviously, this isn't fully true, as 1080p on a supposed $399 3060 with 6GB of memory will likely play everything on the highest settings, with possible exclusions being with ray tracing on the highest settings. But sure if you wanna play at 4K on a $399 card and want to get good performance, then yes, you should be expecting medium to high settings, since the card realistically isn't targeted at 4K gamers.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282600.jpg
I misread something so ignore the quote notification :-P So Nvidia will play the old super game 3060 6 GB 3060 super 8GB now I just hope the following is true 3070 8GB 3070 super 10GB At the point they release the super versions the 3070 10GB wouldn't cannibalize the 3080 as you'd be buying the 3080 super/ti instead, same for the 3070 vs the 3060 8GB
data/avatar/default/avatar25.webp
There is a lot of research already done on VRAM consumption and 1080P gaming. Unlike some people, I decided to look it up before commenting. In 1080P gaming you need to max everything out just to get to 5GB of usage and only in certain demanding games. In most cases even 1440P gaming will be 100% fine on 6GB.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
nosirrahx:

There is a lot of research already done on VRAM consumption and 1080P gaming. Unlike some people, I decided to look it up before commenting. In 1080P gaming you need to max everything out just to get to 5GB of usage and only in certain demanding games. In most cases even 1440P gaming will be 100% fine on 6GB.
You decided to look, good for you. Unless you played most of those games and experienced yourself all those claims dont talk about it.
data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp
Undying:

You decided to look, good for you. Unless you played most of those games and experienced yourself all those claims dont talk about it.
Why do you think so many people researched this? People obsessed with VRAM size don't understand how that part of the equation works so they showed you the number. This isn't a little research, like every review site ever seems to have looked into this. Google -> 'VRAM usage' and then switch to images. This seems to be a hot button issue for you so this could be a lot of fun. Go to each and every one of those pages and yell at them about how they are wrong.