Review: GeForce GTX 1080 Overclocking Guide With AfterBurner 4.3.0 Beta 3
Click here to post a comment for Review: GeForce GTX 1080 Overclocking Guide With AfterBurner 4.3.0 Beta 3 on our message forum
Agent-A01
That's kind of disappointing, my 980ti at 1600~ scored 23400~ on gpu score.
Maybe memory bandwidth limitation
qgshadow
Evildead666
The pipelines are just a little longer to be able to reach the higher clocks compared to the 980 series.
PIII to P4 sort of deal, but not such a big increase in pipeline length.
iirc PIII was ~12 long, and P4 was ~18-20 long.
It may clock higher, but it will yield less performance increase than on the 980 series, on a per clock basis.
Its good for the future, since clocks are basically only going to get higher, as the process matures, and especially when the transition to 10nm comes along.
I'm not sure the extra power plugs on the SuperClock versions etc are actually going to be able to deliver that power, or that the GPU can use it.
@Hilbert : Did the max power consumption increase a lot between the stock values, and the best OC values ?
BLEH!
Nice video, your English is fine.
-Tj-
eclap
user1
Koniakki
I'm curious when someone gets a hold of a custom or ever reference one, to downclock it if possible to 1500-1550MHz and pit it against a 980Ti at the same clocks.
I curious to see the outcome. Just for "scientific/educational" purposes.
Unwinder
Small preview of new feature, which will be available to 1070/1080 owners in beta 4:
http://forums.guru3d.com/showpost.php?p=5280644&postcount=137
jdc2389
Or you could skip the 1080 and wait for big pascal and vega while enjoying a 980ti at 400-450bux :infinity:
Solfaur
Nice to hear your voice Hilbert, looking forward to OCing my future Pascal card with the updated MSI AB, which I couldn't live without anymore. 🙂
weasel
zahry
Something is not adding up.
Something is not adding up for me. I have EVGA 980Ti, ASUS GTX 1080 FE and ASUS R9 295X2 and the scores published here looks mile away from what my scores were in 3d mark firestrike.
the r9 295x2 beats the gtx 1080 by quite a lot
the gtx 1080 beats 980Ti by a bit.
The published GTX 1080 score is way higher than in real life and the R9 295x2 way lower than in RL. Can somebody offer reasonable explanation?
https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/13346978_1024297997655562_1064258689889053595_n.jpg?oh=f069136f54e37c51e7a71a565dba3f42&oe=57CAA3E8&__gda__=1473073623_1a9adfdf6474e1ca8a624dc78d300501