Radeon Adrenalin 2020 Edition Driver Overview

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Radeon Adrenalin 2020 Edition Driver Overview on our message forum
#5739694
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/208/208229.jpg
We all are...we all are 🙂 Anyway - I have a good feeling about this release.
#5739698
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
wddm 2.7??
#5739699
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/238/238369.jpg
Come on M$ , sign the god damn driver already. Also new Windows update for 1903/1909, just in time!
#5739700
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
My guess is it will need to be released at non WHQL due to MS
#5739705
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/133/133128.jpg
I really cant wait to see it never cared much about WHQL to be honest ...
#5739708
data/avatar/default/avatar34.webp
I hope they don't elect to delay the driver instead, but it could happen.
#5739710
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/133/133128.jpg
Spider-Vice:

I hope they don't elect to delay the driver instead, but it could happen.
Most of the "best" drivers from AMD for me were betas... 90% of the time my Vega64 driver is beta. I dont see the point in WHQL if you game on the system. For the latest fixes/patches you will be in beta territory 95% of the time.
#5739713
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
Spider-Vice:

I hope they don't elect to delay the driver instead, but it could happen.
That is not an option on the table as far as I know.
#5739714
data/avatar/default/avatar18.webp
I feel so bad as I can't say much so far.
#5739715
data/avatar/default/avatar34.webp
jeff69dini:

wddm 2.7??
there is no WDDM 2.7 in 1909
#5739719
data/avatar/default/avatar07.webp
about 2 hours now may not be WHQL though best info I have at the moment. Personally I will apologize for the delay as this was not expeceted . Keep in mind spelling is not my thing..
#5739720
data/avatar/default/avatar18.webp
Alessio1989:

there is no WDDM 2.7 in 1909
version 2004 btw?
#5739721
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
mtrai:

I am waiting today as everyone else I have said as much as I can.
Just give a little feedback: "Boost" can be used other way around too. Instead of reducing rendering resolution when performance is low, AMD should enable us to set increased resolution when fps is plenty. (Basically we set fps target to something like 90fps and then maximum resolution multiplier to 1.5x. And Boost will be increasing rendering resolution as long as fps does not drop under 90fps.) This will be real IQ nuke for any older game. No more need for some kind of VSR where image is sent to monitor at higher than native resolution and monitor does downsampling. (As this solution we currently have costs us refresh rate.)
#5739722
data/avatar/default/avatar26.webp
Not seeing myself using Radeon Boost tbh. It's a nice feature for those with frame rate issues, but it might be a bit jarring if you stop moving and your FPS just tanks again.
#5739724
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/133/133128.jpg
Fox2232:

Just give a little feedback: "Boost" can be used other way around too. Instead of reducing rendering resolution when performance is low, AMD should enable us to set increased resolution when fps is plenty. (Basically we set fps target to something like 90fps and then maximum resolution multiplier to 1.5x. And Boost will be increasing rendering resolution as long as fps does not drop under 90fps.) This will be real IQ nuke for any older game. No more need for some kind of VSR where image is sent to monitor at higher than native resolution and monitor does downsampling. (As this solution we currently have costs us refresh rate.)
I dont really see this option needed ? VSR renders at higher res then downsamples to you monitor native anyway ... its an anti aliasing technique at base I dont understand why would you need "boost" when AMD and NVIDIA already have VSR/DSR already for a long time. I think you are missinformed regarding VSR and how it works ? Do you actually lose refresh rate when using VSR ?
#5739725
data/avatar/default/avatar21.webp
bernek:

I dont really see this option needed ? VSR renders at higher res then downsamples to you monitor native anyway ... its an anti aliasing technique at base I dont understand why would you need "boost" when AMD and NVIDIA already have VSR/DSR already for a long time. I think you are missinformed regarding VSR and how it works ? Do you actually lose refresh rate when using VSR ?
Radeon Boost lowers your resolution during movement while VSR adds higher resolutions that downscale back to your monitor's resolution.
#5739726
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
So, did they already fix broken VSync enforcement in DX games?
#5739727
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/208/208229.jpg
Fox2232:

Just give a little feedback: "Boost" can be used other way around too. Instead of reducing rendering resolution when performance is low, AMD should enable us to set increased resolution when fps is plenty. (Basically we set fps target to something like 90fps and then maximum resolution multiplier to 1.5x. And Boost will be increasing rendering resolution as long as fps does not drop under 90fps.) This will be real IQ nuke for any older game. No more need for some kind of VSR where image is sent to monitor at higher than native resolution and monitor does downsampling. (As this solution we currently have costs us refresh rate.)
Check the Hardware Unboxed review - no the Boost only lowers the res, not the other way around.
#5739731
data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp
Really hope this fixes the Freesync brightness flicker issue the 5700's have with some monitors

Previous Page

Next Page