PhysX System Software 9.13.0725 Download

Videocard Acceleration - PhysX | CUDA 31 Updated by Hilbert Hagedoorn

Click here to post a comment for PhysX System Software 9.13.0725 Download on our message forum
#4647257
data/avatar/default/avatar20.webp
definitely slower along with .80 version in company of heroes 2, lost around 5-5-10% from benchmark
#4647316
data/avatar/default/avatar25.webp
anyone tried with and GTX460, I dont want to download this if they had the same crash with my GTX460 with the others 320xxx drivers:wanker:
#4647374
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/251/251394.jpg
So what do you guys say? Does it have the latest fixes? Does it give more FPS on any game? ManuelG help us man......!
#4647377
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/251/251394.jpg
Why stepping backwards and implementing PhysX_9.13.0604 (326.80 contains the newer build)?
Looks Like I got my answer! The 326.80 contains newer fix but this one still doesn't. I am frustrated now.... I needed OpenGL 4.4 to see how it runs but this doesn't contain new fixes.
#4647381
data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp
Looks Like I got my answer! The 326.80 contains newer fix but this one still doesn't. I am frustrated now.... I needed OpenGL 4.4 to see how it runs but this doesn't contain new fixes.
You can install the newer physX with this driver.
#4647403
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/251/251394.jpg
You can install the newer physX with this driver.
You are Right but what about the fixes of 326.80? I need the fixes too. I HAD 326.84 first instead of 326.80 but ManuelG said it didn't contain the fixes of 326.80 so I reverted to 326.80 and you know what? he was right. I downloaded 326.80 and wham! I got "nice" FPS on some games Edit: BTW, I am talking about the FIXES not PhysX because PhysX causes LAG! And The TDR Fix looks like important. 😛c1:
#4647405
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/209/209401.jpg
omg.........
#4647407
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/251/251394.jpg
omg.........
What do you mean?
#4647412
data/avatar/default/avatar09.webp
So 326.80 performs better than these openGL betas?
#4647413
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/251/251394.jpg
See what I found: The OpenGL driver(326.84) vs. The normal Game Ready driver(326.80) Source : Laptopvideo2go.com
NVIDIA DRIVER 326.84 VS DRIVER 326.80 Mon, 26 Aug 2013 17:50:23 +0000 I did a driver comparison using Fraps in CoD Black Ops 2 multiplayer. Driver 326.84 vs driver 326.80. I was testing because I couldn't figure out why I seemed to be doing much better in the game while using the driver 326.84. Test setup: GTX 680 at default clocks, Haswell 4770K cpu at 3.9 GHz, Windows 8.1 Pro Preview 64-bit In-game AA set to 4x MSAA, resolution set to 1920 x 1080, AO and DoF set to Off, MaxFPS set to Unlimited. Benchmark was run for 60 seconds in map Hijacked with just me running around. Results: Frames MinFPS AvgFPS MaxFPS 21044 278 350.733 439 - Driver 326.84 1st run 21454 279 357.567 429 - Driver 326.84 2nd run 21170 278 352.833 432 - Driver 326.80 1st run 21476 282 357.933 438 - Driver 326.80 2nd run Analysis of results: 1) The differences in MinFPS, AvgFPS and MaxFPS are not significant. They can be explained as normal variance in the different test runs. 2) The 326.80 driver showed a slight tendency to process more frames during the testing. 3) The 326.80 driver had a better IQ. It made things look better than the 326.84 driver. When I got more kills in the game using the 326.84 driver, the enemy players might have thought I was lagging a bit, based on their reactions to my movements. I'm wondering if I was scoring better with the 326.84 driver because I was processing less frames per the packets I was sending, or because of the worse-looking graphics.
#4647417
data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp
I saw that post too. I saw other posts that said 326.84 forces the gpu to run at 99% when playing games and that 326.80 doesn't. Can you confirm or deny it?
#4647420
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/251/251394.jpg
I saw that post too. I saw other posts that said 326.84 forces the gpu to run at 99% when playing games and that 326.80 doesn't. Can you confirm or deny it?
While playing any game I keep eyes on the temp. of my GPU. So while playing Assassins Creed Brotherhood or Prototype 2, Modern Warfare 2, And NFS MW 2012 its usually 99% with boosted core clock (797.6mhz) as it shows on Nvidia Inspector btw I did not OC it. But I cannot Confirm It on any other's Rig it usually depends on the gpu. But I get better FPS With the 326.80.
#4647468
data/avatar/default/avatar40.webp
anyone can confirm if this drivers fix the freezes and lock ups with the GTX460 OR GTX 550TI???
#4647493
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/189/189799.jpg
anyone can confirm if this drivers fix the freezes and lock ups with the GTX460 OR GTX 550TI???
using this driver now for allmost 24 hours and i did not have any BSOD´s or freezes..(also using an Crazy OCed GTX460) War thunder runs ok..Bf3 runs as good as normal (with 99% gpu usage..)Saints row 4 also run fine and so on.. Media player classic HC with LAV and MADVR also run great. no worries here... so far , so good, id say...
#4647499
data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp
also get strange flickering in splinter cell black list, but then I think that that maybe a problem with the game.
#4647503
data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp
jesus nvidia only problems, buy an HD7970 a solve all you problems mates!
#4647505
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/189/189799.jpg
jesus nvidia only problems, buy an HD7970 a solve all you problems mates!
pffff....go back to ur AMD forum and spam there.. Or post something usefull.... jeeeez....:3eyes:
#4647520
data/avatar/default/avatar12.webp
man i said it seriously... i had gtx 680 and i selled it for all drivers problems...
#4647526
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/185/185964.jpg
Guess you've been playing some weird games then.

Previous Page

Next Page