Nvidia LiveStream Event Later today

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Nvidia LiveStream Event Later today on our message forum
#5267863
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/252/252888.jpg
You can drink, watch and spam twitch chat at the same time. Here is your timeline: :givebeer: :boozer: 😛c1: :spam: :gta: 😛uke: :boozer: :eyebrows: :kissin: :banana: :cop:
Hahaha, that timeline wouldn't suprise me at all :P Might be able to get the other guys/chicks to put it on beamer :banana:
#5268077
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
hehe I know how you feel my friend, just had it this way with the Overwatch beta launch at 1am our time instead of maybe earlier so everybody could play on the 2nd, not only the Americas 😉 But...
Yeah, but I am used to watch those things as soon as possible. And I have to be up early tomorrow and will have busy day. This way I may not see it till Monday.
#5268353
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Alright you guys, the event is about to start. Embedded stream on the frontpage is live.
#5268360
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
It started, he already trololls xD
#5268361
data/avatar/default/avatar05.webp
Hey everybody, Guru3D has landed in Texas for two days of briefings with Nvidia. We'll talk about the new and upcoming stuff, with that said, we'll be hosting a Twitch livestream later today so that... Nvidia LiveStream Event Later today
Uhm, Guru3D is not the one hosting this livestream, nvidia is?
#5268366
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/130/130603.jpg
Uhm, Guru3D is not the one hosting this livestream, nvidia is?
I can't belive they called it 1080. Of the unedicated there about to be some confusing. From a marketing standpoint it does not make any sense.
#5268369
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
Rofl that performance graph. Nvidia has the worst graphs. It's like 20% faster. 3.5 --> 4.5
#5268371
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/256/256969.jpg
funny like sometimes he's highly specific and precise and... "it's faster than Titan-X... by a lot".... ROFL Not a word on new APIs yet
#5268372
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/169/169957.jpg
Rofl that performance graph. Nvidia has the worst graphs. It's like 20% faster. 3.5 --> 4.5
he already gave it away man come on he was talking about clean power delivery, that's not even gpu-related, it's board related; he's confirming that they tweaked the entire board design to allow for the higher clocks and stay within the 330mm budget that said, reference board design must be pretty good for that big an improvement in ripple 980 users will flock to it 980ti users should wait unless they have money to burn
#5268374
data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp
Did he literally said it's faster than x2 980ti? I'm still shocked.
#5268375
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/169/169957.jpg
Did he literally said it's faster than x2 980ti? I'm still shocked.
no he said 980 in SLI not twice as powerful as a 980 but faster than 980 sli
#5268377
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/256/256969.jpg
Did he literally said it's faster than x2 980ti? I'm still shocked.
980!!! The 980-Ti won't be mentionned lol... it's a just "a lot" faster than titan-x and can run the division on Ultra over 60fps rofl, no info on resolution used. If it's 1080, it's a pure joke.
#5268378
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/222/222132.jpg
Did he literally said it's faster than x2 980ti? I'm still shocked.
No, he didn't mention SLI 980 Ti, He mentioned the non-TI versions.
#5268380
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
09:44PM EDT - Back of the envelope calculation says that GTX 1080 should be around 25% faster than GTX 980 Ti, using NVIDIA's numbers Edit: Obviously stock 980Ti.
#5268382
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/169/169957.jpg
09:44PM EDT - Back of the envelope calculation says that GTX 1080 should be around 25% faster than GTX 980 Ti, using NVIDIA's numbers
It's GG. 980Ti overclocks comfortably by 35% What numbers ?!
#5268383
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
Holy ****, 2114 Mhz, 67c Yet it's only 25% faster then a Ti? I wonder if the core count we thought it was is wrong. Either that or Pascal is significantly slower per clock, which doesn't make much sense to me.
#5268384
data/avatar/default/avatar40.webp
Holy ****, 2114 Mhz, 67c.
67ºC xD Theres plenty of room to keep going
#5268385
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/256/256969.jpg
2100+ MHz, omg, the beast so 1800Mhz base, 2100+ boost

Previous Page

Next Page