Great chip, but very unlikely to see a gaming card based on it anytime soon. It's simply way too expensive to manufacture. A Volta gaming card would be 1600 $ minimum. Stick to your 1070, 1080 and 1080Ti or whatever else you (we) have, because those are the only toys to play with until probably late 2018

wavetrex:

Great chip, but very unlikely to see a gaming card based on it anytime soon. It's simply way too expensive to manufacture. A Volta gaming card would be 1600 $ minimum. Stick to your 1070, 1080 and 1080Ti or whatever else you (we) have, because those are the only toys to play with until probably late 2018

We still need something to run those 4K/120Hz monitors that are being released 😉 A 1080Ti (or even two) simply won't cut it.

Netherwind:

We still need something to run those 4K/120Hz monitors that are being released 😉 A 1080Ti (or even two) simply won't cut it.

I want OLED, HDR, HLG, Dolby-Vision and 0 latency - no point buying a new monitor unless I got that on board. No point at all. Kinda tired of incremental upgrades - I want it all, and am willing to wait patiently for it. This whole round of CPU and GPU that's been going on since...Sandybridge? hasn't really had much of difference. I'm liking the future and I welcome it, but until then, this is mostly posturing by CPU and GPU manufacturers. Except for this. This looks like things are changing, but the cost is the big no-no for me, and the lack of OLED - yet teevee OLED's drop like 60% in the first year, which is amazing (LG B7 range is a steal right now!) and hopefully will push more companies to offer smaller panels for desktop usage, the demand is there for a 24-27 inch OLED desktop 4K HDR monitor, just waiting for it to happen...

It's just a matter of time before a gaming variant of this comes out with maybe gddr5x/6 or 2 stacks of hbm2 And without the tensor core stuff

wavetrex:

Great chip, but very unlikely to see a gaming card based on it anytime soon. It's simply way too expensive to manufacture. A Volta gaming card would be 1600 $ minimum. Stick to your 1070, 1080 and 1080Ti or whatever else you (we) have, because those are the only toys to play with until probably late 2018

Yeah. Since Vega can only compete with Pascal up to 1080 and can't even challenge 1080Ti, unless there's some very special case, Nvidia folks ought not to be in any hurry and pressure to replace the Pascal consumer line. They can take their time to ponder their options and choose the best approach for both themselves (financially) and the consumers (since GPUs have always been showing generational progress, unlike CPUs).

Impressive. Things to take away is even if a system has multiples GPUs, Geekbench benchmark is using only one GPU. So each line in the table is using one GPU even though it might have multiple GPU's inside, i.e., one V100 vs one P100. Currently the highest RX Vega entry in Geekbench 4 compute OpenCL result is 204,593. For detail on each table entry: https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/compute?dir=desc&sort=score

impressive but can it fold 😉

Loobyluggs:

I want OLED, HDR, HLG, Dolby-Vision and 0 latency - no point buying a new monitor unless I got that on board. No point at all. Kinda tired of incremental upgrades - I want it all, and am willing to wait patiently for it. This whole round of CPU and GPU that's been going on since...Sandybridge? hasn't really had much of difference. I'm liking the future and I welcome it, but until then, this is mostly posturing by CPU and GPU manufacturers. Except for this. This looks like things are changing, but the cost is the big no-no for me, and the lack of OLED - yet teevee OLED's drop like 60% in the first year, which is amazing (LG B7 range is a steal right now!) and hopefully will push more companies to offer smaller panels for desktop usage, the demand is there for a 24-27 inch OLED desktop 4K HDR monitor, just waiting for it to happen...

Doubt we will see OLED in PC monitors anytime soon. The static desktop image would destroy the panel in a few months. Especially something like start panel...

Glad to hear there is at least some indication the next step will be another big one. I'm hoping I can replace my 970 sli with a single card that's more powerful, for relatively cheap ($200-$250).

The Edge:

Doubt we will see OLED in PC monitors anytime soon. The static desktop image would destroy the panel in a few months. Especially something like start panel...

True unfortunately, it's rather easy to preserve Oled though I am using a LG E6 as a desktop and have no burn in. The secret is to make it so that your screen saver comes on within 3 minutes, and don't use the thing for browsing marathons. Even if you let a static image stay on for an hour or so just use the tv normally and the image retention goes away, but obviously permanent damage will start to set in after many multiple hours. But most standard human beings probably won't give a **** and just let the thing burn and then they complain afterwards. I don't see OLED as a viable monitor ever because of that.

So is that the score of the whole system DGX-1? I am confused. I have no clue what those other system stats are. Of course this should be faster tho.

The Edge:

Doubt we will see OLED in PC monitors anytime soon. The static desktop image would destroy the panel in a few months. Especially something like start panel...

seeing as we been wating 10+ years for it i sure it will 10+ before it happens, if they dont find some other tech that better in that time that actual see the light of day to replaced led/lcd, I will setter for seeing 32/40" oled TV i dont use my TV as PC moniotr often, I only switch to it when I want to play one my games on 32" instead of 23", next TV will be 40" which biggest i manage so long as its got low profiles frame., current samsung 40" are 2" wider then them LNA32550A. As for V100 that is a righteous score, When and IF the next 11xx series comes out and if based on this? 1160 or what ever it called, would be the card i get and sit on till it dies like did with my 9800GT 1080p/1440p done with ease keeping 60fps on high, with 25% or more power to spare would be ideal card to me 9800gt fit the right up till it died, atlest for 1080p this probably wishful thinking though, 1440p monitor will be next monitor 4k monitor not happening gpu are not ready, and TV are pretty much 1080p or 4k so when I get new tv it will be 4k.

tsunami231:

seeing as we been wating 10+ years for it i sure it will 10+ before it happens, if they dont find some other tech that better in that time that actual see the light of day to replaced led/lcd, I will setter for seeing 32/40" oled TV i dont use my TV as PC moniotr often, I only switch to it when I want to play one my games on 32" instead of 23", next TV will be 40" which biggest i manage so long as its got low profiles frame., current samsung 40" are 2" wider then them LNA32550A. As for V100 that is a righteous score, When and IF the next 11xx series comes out and if based on this? 1160 or what ever it called, would be the card i get and sit on till it dies like did with my 9800GT 1080p/1440p done with ease keeping 60fps on high, with 25% or more power to spare would be ideal card to me 9800gt fit the right up till it died, atlest for 1080p this probably wishful thinking though, 1440p monitor will be next monitor 4k monitor not happening gpu are not ready, and TV are pretty much 1080p or 4k so when I get new tv it will be 4k.

OLED still has some teething issues too with it burning out a lot faster than say LCD and LED, so yeah might be awhile... i'm quite intent with IPS back bleeding has gone down a lot in recent years which is nice. But yeah, this are good results considering this isn't even the "full" v100 but a slightly cut down version. we might see the 1160 be as strong as the 1080 depending on how they cut down the cards... with the 1170 being as strong as the 1080ti and the 1180 being the new king chip (around 20-30% stronger than the current 1080ti) (guessing we would have to wait another 9-12 months for the 1180ti). Might be able to finally replace my 980ti with a worthwhile upgrade with the 1180

baasgene:

True unfortunately, it's rather easy to preserve Oled though I am using a LG E6 as a desktop and have no burn in. The secret is to make it so that your screen saver comes on within 3 minutes, and don't use the thing for browsing marathons. Even if you let a static image stay on for an hour or so just use the tv normally and the image retention goes away, but obviously permanent damage will start to set in after many multiple hours. But most standard human beings probably won't give a **** and just let the thing burn and then they complain afterwards. I don't see OLED as a viable monitor ever because of that.

Until they fix this if it can be fixed i don't see myself going OLED, i can game on my pc for many hours at a time, so having it burn out due to that would just be a huge waste of money on my part... might be fine for general use or whatever but i don't think it is good for anyone currently who spends a good 4-6 hours straight a day on the PC with this thing being on the whole time. can see it burning out quite quickly... be interesting to know if this issue can be fixed or if this is just a fault in design and we should be waiting for new technology to replace it

sorry but i don´t believe on Geekbench numbers, they can put any number in its page remenber EPYC numbers and Iphone numbers, so afar from reallity, sorry Geekbench your maketing does´nt impress me grettings

Ricepudding:

'm quite intent with IPS back bleeding has gone down a lot in recent years which is nice.

I dont know about that maybe for Monitors ? but majority of ALL 4k/HD tv that use IPS have some nasty back bleeding, and some these have some truely horrible contrast ratios. I still prefer TN over IPS and I rather have VA over IPS. some the VA panels samsung uses have some truely nice blacks almost void of any clouding can say same of the IPS panels sony uses in some of the 4k tvs lower Response times are must the 2ms on my monitor is not good enough and 5ms my HDTV has is really noticeable over my 2ms monitor. and backbleeding are huge no no's to me which ISP still seem to suffer from more then other panels. back bleeding and high response times run ruin the better colors they have as far as concerned. we can hope the 1160 so numbers close to 1070/1080, special if manage to reduce the power consumption too

tsunami231:

I dont know about that maybe for Monitors ? but majority of ALL 4k/HD tv that use IPS have some nasty back bleeding, and some these have some truely horrible contrast ratios. I still prefer TN over IPS and I rather have VA over IPS. some the VA panels samsung uses have some truely nice blacks almost void of any clouding can say same of the IPS panels sony uses in some of the 4k tvs lower Response times are must the 2ms on my monitor is not good enough and 5ms my HDTV has is really noticeable over my 2ms monitor. and backbleeding are huge no no's to me which ISP still seem to suffer from more then other panels. back bleeding and high response times run ruin the better colors they have as far as concerned. we can hope the 1160 so numbers close to 1070/1080, special if manage to reduce the power consumption too

I think there is still some luck involved. but my ASUS IPS monitor has barely if no back bleed on it, but yeah TN is nice... but has worse colors and viewing angles sadly.... VA is nice but i don't think they do high refresh rate monitors? unless ive just not seen any. But yeah for 4k TV's i reckon the back bleed would be horrible... bigger the screen i reckon the worst it would be. My ASUS is 2/3ms cannot remember now, it's very low for an IPS which is good. I just want high refresh rate these days, it makes far more difference than most other things, be nice when DP 1.4 comes out and we get 144Hz 4k screens and 240Hz 1440p It just depends on how Nvidia cuts their chips, in reality we could see the 1160 be something more like a 1070ti that has been rumoured... Sadly there is no competition in the top end right now so it's hard to say what Nvidia will do... however because of AI i think they will still bring out strong cards regardless due to there massive market there. Personally i'm waiting for the 1180, specially if it ends up being stronger than the current 1080ti. Power is already quite low on most of nvidia cards, i don't know how much different we will see, it will be more we get more performance for the watt rather than just wattage go down, 1160 150w~ TDP most likely

seeing IF i bought monitors with this 120hz + and i might care about xx70/80 cards then i would want card that can comforable do 100fps but i still can bring my self to buy such monitor cause then i have to go with gpu's that can feed it. which more money i dont care to spend. Still going with 60hz , do miss my old CRT that did 75 hz cause i did did see diffrence from 60 to 75 in smoothness, but hz can only do much with the motion blurr caused my low response times, and i have seen these 120hz lcd while they nice, to me it not worth price tag and extra cost that has to be added to gpu to feed them. i already have issue spending 300$ for gpu, and my current monitor i spend 200$ for

Yes, but can it run Crysis?

SweenJM:

The addition of the tensor AI asic seems like the biggest breakthrough on these chips. nearly 12 petaflops when doing integer and floating point......wow.

Tensor cores are not used in this benchmark.