Isn't the division works far better on AMD than nvidia? i've seen 280X topping GTX970.

Isn't the division works far better on AMD than nvidia? i've seen 280X topping GTX970.

Nah, not even close but yes, AMD do perform better in Division just as Nvidia perform better in Tomb Raider. That 970m they are bundle this game with probably cant even beat something like R9 270.

Nah, not even close but yes, AMD do perform better in Division just as Nvidia perform better in Tomb Raider. That 970m they are bundle this game with probably cant even beat something like R9 270.

well i don't trust any benchmark as those are random numbers... nvidia card perform much much better in real gameplay and that all that matters... Open beta in two days hopefully it won't be ubisofted!!!

well i don't trust any benchmark as those are random numbers... nvidia card perform much much better in real gameplay and that all that matters... Open beta in two days hopefully it won't be ubisofted!!!

What does this even mean.. Like I could I see an argument that maybe one side favors synthetics like 3DMark but not real games. But if you bench The Division and AMD is not only faster in FPS but lower in frame time percentile, then Nvidia simply isn't better in that particular game. Whether or not that's the case with Division I have no idea, but yeah, that's basically how it works.

What does this even mean.. Like I could I see an argument that maybe one side favors synthetics like 3DMark but not real games. But if you bench The Division and AMD is not only faster in FPS but lower in frame time percentile, then Nvidia simply isn't better in that particular game. Whether or not that's the case with Division I have no idea, but yeah, that's basically how it works.

Division is amd favored but i added that in my experience observing only the benchmarks does no justice to anyone.

970 and 980 for high settings , ubisoft dont optimise games very well so to play it maxed at 1080p i bet u need 6gb vram or more so u need a 980ti or titan x