so... The say nvidia revenue goes up 24% from a year ago after they release new cards 24% more expensive... intresting...

Looking at this the normal 1050 will be exactly the same as the GTX 950, less shaders but it's clock speeds will make up for it but ultimately if you have a GTX 950 the 1050 is a worthless upgrade.

Looking at this the normal 1050 will be exactly the same as the GTX 950, less shaders but it's clock speeds will make up for it but ultimately if you have a GTX 950 the 1050 is a worthless upgrade.

QFT This product is purely for OEM. Though I would like to see power figures.

QFT This product is purely for OEM.

Not really. Yes, it would be stupid to get this if you already have a 950 or higher. But if you skipped that generation and have an older budget card this might be a good budget upgrade. It's stupid to upgrade any card every generation.

You said "That would be faster then a Radeon RX 460 reports VideoCardz." "Then?" I believe it would be faster THAN a Radeon RX 460." :bang:

so... The say nvidia revenue goes up 24% from a year ago after they release new cards 24% more expensive... intresting...

...what GTX 950 at launch, $159 GTX 1050 at launch, $119 GTX 1050 ti at launch, $139 So....24% more expensive means what to you?

@chronek lol, just because you sell something for 24% more, doesnt mean your revenue increases by the same amount. 2nd, a 1070 is now around 350, same like a 970. and even if its 400$, that would just mean an increase of 15%.

You said "That would be faster then a Radeon RX 460 reports VideoCardz." "Then?" I believe it would be faster THAN a Radeon RX 460." :bang:

:) and it's easy as the GTX950 is already faster

Won't somebody please think of madVR?!? 😛aranoid:

...what GTX 950 at launch, $159 GTX 1050 at launch, $119 GTX 1050 ti at launch, $139 So....24% more expensive means what to you?

I said that about every card that nvidia released this year, why i should mention 1050 ti when even 1080 can barely play new games at 30 fps? And statistic said most buyed 1080, yes 1050 have good price, but still is a crap, and nvidia increase revenue saying that if you can not afford sli 1080 then buy 1050 ti

@chronek lol, just because you sell something for 24% more, doesnt mean your revenue increases by the same amount. 2nd, a 1070 is now around 350, same like a 970. and even if its 400$, that would just mean an increase of 15%.

Most buy this year was 1080, and in my country 1080 is 840$, when 980 i bought 670$, it is a bit more then 24% price increase (on most bought product), and nvidia announce 24% revenue increase, i just point that..

I think the only way Nvidia can increase revenues at this point is price increases since I doubt they can increase market share anymore since amd has stolen some back.

I think the only way Nvidia can increase revenues at this point is price increases since I doubt they can increase market share anymore since amd has stolen some back.

not so easy, if you look closer to stat VS enviromental AMD concentrate effort on middle segment (the one where you earn money btw), and where maxwell series is a hit (despite the small bus of the gtx960 🙂) , NVidia is nearly nowhere on laptop segment and AMD on pro segment where the other color can be bought and are in stock lol... also don't forget that APU is still counted as GPU as intel IGP. at the end the real winner is still blue...

I said that about every card that nvidia released this year, why i should mention 1050 ti when even 1080 can barely play new games at 30 fps? And statistic said most buyed 1080, yes 1050 have good price, but still is a crap, and nvidia increase revenue saying that if you can not afford sli 1080 then buy 1050 ti

wtf are you on about? This thread that we are talking about is about the 1050/1050 Ti, of which you said were more expensive, of which obviously as shown and proven, are not Are you saying you're going into each thread and purposefully spewing crap that has nothing to do with the thread topic? Good job being a troll In regards to "revenue" and "increases in price" etc. People don't realize: inflation Hercules Graphics Card released in 1982 - $499 - with inflation $1245.45 Geforce 2 Ultra release price in 2000 - $500 - with inflation $699.34 Geforce 3 release price in 2001 - $500 - with inflation 680.38 GeForce 6800 Ultra Extreme release price in 2004 - $600 - with inflation $765.02 This list goes on and on, so yes, we have some "super" cards, aka the titans and the like, which SHOULDN'T be considered what use to be high end just becoming more expensive due to the nature of those cards (realistically, other then maybe the GTX 8800 Ultra, which today would have cost 962.98, there really hasn't been cards similar to the titans before), but other then those, we're still riding the same basic costs for cards, if not lower

Most buy this year was 1080, and in my country 1080 is 840$, when 980 i bought 670$, it is a bit more then 24% price increase (on most bought product), and nvidia announce 24% revenue increase, i just point that..

So you're blaming your countries inability to price things correctly...on nvidia. That's cool. GTX 1080 is $599.99 for basic model GTX 980 was $549.99 for basic model If there's not a 50 dollar USD equivalent difference, that's your countries/retailers fault. Gotta love people who don't understand that.

Single slot please..... Also folks, let's keep it civil here.