MLC SSDs just as reliable as SLC anno 2016 says Google
Click here to post a comment for MLC SSDs just as reliable as SLC anno 2016 says Google on our message forum
bemaniac
do you mean mlc just as reliable as slc?
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Whoops !
slyphnier
SSD age, not usage, affects reliability.
this claim ... i wonder how they test it ...
its hard to believe they purchase some SSD just to store it
last time i read that ssd only can retain/hold data 3-4 months for enterprise while consumer ssd can hold around 1 year
now another cons of SSD...
i think we still need more time before completely ditching tradiotional hdd and move to SSD completely
and if that limitation of memory-chip, then it might as well will never replacing traditional hdd
Reddoguk
"30-80 percent of SSDs develop at least one bad block and 2-7 percent develop at least one bad chip in the first four years of deployment".
WTH does that even mean? Such a wide difference between 30% and 80%.
Is it different brands some 30 some 80% or what.
Denial
fry178
@slyphnier
i had more hdd's die on me in the last 15y (that im upgrading/building my own rigs),
vs ZERO failures on any ssd i own(ed), which is about 20.
all ssd's are still in use by others (sold most of them).
after the 1TB toshiba died within 5m, i got rid of all hdds (mainly storage/backup).
just the transfer rates alone are worth it (to me)..
Koniakki
All I got from the article is the bottom line. Back up guys, BACK UP now more than evah!!
slyphnier