List of FreeSync - Adaptive Sync Compatible Monitors

Published by

Click here to post a comment for List of FreeSync - Adaptive Sync Compatible Monitors on our message forum
#4992496
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/244/244064.jpg
When we will see a review about "Freesync" vs "G-Sync" ?
#4992501
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248627.jpg
I love this Nvidia can take their overpriced gsync and shove it.
#4992502
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/79/79740.jpg
Typo: the LG 34UM67 is 3440x1440 not 2560x1080.
#4992507
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258664.jpg
I love this Nvidia can take their overpriced gsync and shove it.
Is there actually any fsync device already priced? I feel like I missed that bit of information...
#4992521
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
When we will see a review about "Freesync" vs "G-Sync" ?
Comparison is simple: - In supported refresh rate of screen both technologies are exactly same. You can look for youtube 1000fps recording of freesync, no stutter there in comparison to v-sync on/off, no tearing. - If you run out of specification GSync forces VSync, Freesync leaves option to use VSync ON/OFF in users hand. - users of both are likely to limit fps via driver/too to max refresh rate of screen or 1fps below that. Only thing which is not known is input lag of NO-Sync vs Freesync vs G-Sync. Blurbusters have kind of "lame" measurement of NO-Sync vs G-Sync (not in the method but in number of measurement) therefore not exact. That shows that NO-Sync and G-Sync has similar average input lag, but G-Sync has much higher variance between measurements. - If such high variance occurs one should look for reason and do more measurement of both NO-sync and G-Sync to confirm that there really exists difference and it was not strike of luck on NO-Sync.
Is there actually any fsync device already priced? I feel like I missed that bit of information...
Only one to my knowledge and that is ASUS MG279Q for $600. In comparison to GSync ASUS PG278Q which goes from $800+.
#4992522
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/180/180081.jpg
Is there actually any fsync device already priced? I feel like I missed that bit of information...
Probably going to go with a premium, but doesn't require proprietary solutions licensed from nVidia, so potentially it'll be cheaper than gsync but more expensive than without. All monitors should come with it though. And nvidia should get off their ass and stop making more nvidia only solutions. I want the tech in future monitor purchases, but I'm not willing to spend 25% extra on a monitor to get it.
#4992524
data/avatar/default/avatar27.webp
Typo: the LG 34UM67 is 3440x1440 not 2560x1080.
Do you have a source for this? Every other place lists it as 2560x1080. I really hope it's 3440x1440, so it can be my new monitor.
#4992530
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/244/244064.jpg
Comparison is simple: - In supported refresh rate of screen both technologies are exactly same. You can look for youtube 1000fps recording of freesync, no stutter there in comparison to v-sync on/off, no tearing. - If you run out of specification GSync forces VSync, Freesync leaves option to use VSync ON/OFF in users hand. - users of both are likely to limit fps via driver/too to max refresh rate of screen or 1fps below that. Only thing which is not known is input lag of NO-Sync vs Freesync vs G-Sync. Blurbusters have kind of "lame" measurement of NO-Sync vs G-Sync (not in the method but in number of measurement) therefore not exact. That shows that NO-Sync and G-Sync has similar average input lag, but G-Sync has much higher variance between measurements. - If such high variance occurs one should look for reason and do more measurement of both NO-sync and G-Sync to confirm that there really exists difference and it was not strike of luck on NO-Sync. Only one to my knowledge and that is ASUS MG279Q for $600. In comparison to GSync ASUS PG278Q which goes from $800+.
Thx for the comparison but I don`t trust AMD users,no offence.I`ll just wait for the legit reviews,here on Guru3D and Blurbusters.
#4992534
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
Thx for the comparison but I don`t trust AMD users,no offence.I`ll just wait for the legit reviews,here on Guru3D and Blurbusters.
Then see for yourself, use your own brain. And follow my advice, look for that 1000fps recording on YT.
#4992538
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/178/178868.jpg
Good to see more freesync panels being released. Always better for competition and cheaper prices.
#4992556
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/79/79740.jpg
Do you have a source for this? Every other place lists it as 2560x1080. I really hope it's 3440x1440, so it can be my new monitor.
From the horses mouth? All 34" 21:9 LG displays are 3440x1440. The 2560x1080 are 29" and reflect that in model no.
LG’s Curved 34-inch 21:9 Monitor with Extensive Screen LG’s curved 34-inch UltraWide monitor (Model 34UC97) in Quad HD resolution (3440 x 1440) makes maximum use of screen real estate. http://www.lg.com/au/press-release/lg-to-introduce-its-first-219-gaming-monitor-with-amd-freesync-at-ces-2015
and ... http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/lg-34um67-ultra-wide-gaming-monitor-gets-amd-freesync.html
#4992566
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258664.jpg
Only one to my knowledge and that is ASUS MG279Q for $600. In comparison to GSync ASUS PG278Q which goes from $800+.
That's pretty neat, and to me personally, the MG279Q has reasonable pricing. It's expensive, but not as expensive as the PG278Q, and potentially giving you the same advantage.
Probably going to go with a premium, but doesn't require proprietary solutions licensed from nVidia, so potentially it'll be cheaper than gsync but more expensive than without. All monitors should come with it though. And nvidia should get off their ass and stop making more nvidia only solutions. I want the tech in future monitor purchases, but I'm not willing to spend 25% extra on a monitor to get it.
I agree they should drop prices on gsync monitors, but I don't expect any of those to drop in prices, not even as fsync gets available and finds it's way into people's homes.
#4992571
data/avatar/default/avatar16.webp
I understand to sync the frames with the cpu it lowers the refresh rate avoiding page tearing that's what I understand happens on both. What I want to ask is with mantle today and dx12 around the corner where they bring whats usually controlled system side to graphics side. will that effect how this tech works.?
#4992573
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258664.jpg
I understand to sync the frames with the cpu it lowers the refresh rate avoiding page tearing that's what I understand happens on both. What I want to ask is with mantle today and dx12 around the corner where they bring whats usually controlled system side to graphics side. will that effect how this tech works.?
Aren't gsync and fsync already handled by the graphics driver, not the API? Or did I understand that wrong? 🙂
#4992577
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/68/68055.jpg
Good to see more freesync panels being released. Always better for competition and cheaper prices.
This. My wallet is ready for a more reasonably priced G-Sync monitor.
#4992580
data/avatar/default/avatar36.webp
dont know
Aren't gsync and fsync already handled by the graphics driver, not the API? Or did I understand that wrong? 🙂
I don't know that's why im asking. If freesync or gsync work by syncing the graphics with the cpu will this effect how mantle works ? Because mantle stores the information that's usually stored system side onto the graphics side. How will free sync work with these new api mantle dx12 ??? Can anyone pls tell us if the syncing works with these new api ? Will it still sync gpu to cpu when its all stored onto the graphics ?
#4992582
data/avatar/default/avatar12.webp
Sweet! Upgrade time coming soon! 🙂
#4992589
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
I don't know that's why im asking. If freesync or gsync work by syncing the graphics with the cpu will this effect how mantle works ? Because mantle stores the information that's usually stored system side onto the graphics side. How will free sync work with these new api mantle dx12 ??? Can anyone pls tell us if the syncing works with these new api ? Will it still sync gpu to cpu when its all stored onto the graphics ?
Kind of full of misconceptions. There was never need to sync GPU to CPU, graphics driver tells DX/Mantle API that it is ready to get new frame information to render. That is only sync there is between GPU and "CPU" (CPU has nothing to do with it, it just processes general x86 instructions of any kind). Mantle/DX12 will work with Free/G-Sync without problem. Because both solutions use Graphics card display output to do all synchronization. More interesting question would be if Non DP 1.2a compliant Card can be used for rendering and then image would be Freesynced to display via 1.2a compliant APU output. This may increase sales for APUs since there are many powerful enough GPUs around which don't support Freesync. And if so, can image be rendered by nVidia HW and displayed via APU? :infinity:

Next Page