#5328664

geogan

2016-08-31 10:43

It's funny they wrote all that marketing blurb about the two 34" monitors and yet omitted the main spec feature of screen resolution....

#5328668

JonasBeckman

2016-08-31 10:52

It's funny they wrote all that marketing blurb about the two 34" monitors and yet omitted the main spec feature of screen resolution....

3840x2160 is mentioned but that's 16:9 so I assume the 21:9 ones are going to be 3440x1440 if I remember the screen resolutions for that aspect ratio correctly.

#5328672

zer0_c0ol

2016-08-31 11:00

So with this amd has 104 free-sync mon in the wild?

#5328757

ontelo

2016-08-31 13:43

3840x2160 is mentioned but that's 16:9 so I assume the 21:9 ones are going to be 3440x1440 if I remember the screen resolutions for that aspect ratio correctly.

http://www.lg.com/de/monitore/lg-34UC79G-B 2560 x 1080 @ 144 Hz

#5328840

Kloet075

2016-08-31 16:30

http://www.lg.com/de/monitore/lg-34UC79G-B 2560 x 1080 @ 144 Hz

Hmm strange at their website it says Native Auflösung 3440 x 1440 Bild max. Auflösung 2560 x 1080 @ 144 Hz So 2560x1080 @144 hz however 3440x1440 @60 hz?

#5328876

Asgardi

2016-08-31 17:31

So with this amd has 104 free-sync mon in the wild?

Yeah. I don't know how these guys think who would buy these in high volumes? AMDs market share is ridiculously low, especially on high end. You basically need high end NV card to run these screens with latest games but G-Sync is not supported which doesn't make much sense.

#5328878

holler

2016-08-31 17:35

I run 3440x1440 just fine on a 290x. AMD loves high resolutions... plus a lot cheaper to implement adapative sync(freesync) then royalty laden g-sync.

#5329041

SoloCreep

2016-08-31 22:37

I run 3440x1440 just fine on a 290x. AMD loves high resolutions... plus a lot cheaper to implement adapative sync(freesync) then royalty laden g-sync.

Most people who have the money to buy all this high end stuff buy NVidia gpus. This monitor is a waste. I'm don't care either way about brands "they dont come visit the family or take me to dinner" but it's the truth.

#5329114

ScoobyDooby

2016-09-01 02:00

I run 3440x1440 just fine on a 290x. AMD loves high resolutions... plus a lot cheaper to implement adapative sync(freesync) then royalty laden g-sync.

A 290x, is a lot different than 3x Crossfire 290x..

#5329148

JonasBeckman

2016-09-01 06:18

A 290x, is a lot different than 3x Crossfire 290x..

Yeah it should be but then there's AMD's Crossfire support lately. :P (Well they did just release a driver for Battlefield 1 and Mankind Divided so I guess it's improving slightly, at least for the big profile games or games supported by AMD in some way.)