Intel to Offer Affordable 600p NVMe SSDs

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Intel to Offer Affordable 600p NVMe SSDs on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
That's some serious value there! Almost half price of other equivalent capacity NVME SSD's. The write could been a bit better but oh well. I would love that 1TB version. Hell, I would gladly taken that 512GB Intel 600p NVME SSD over my 256GB 950 PRO anytime! :thumbup:
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248994.jpg
As great as it is to get some competition in the market that only had Samsung devices, it's equally weird to see Intel products with reasonable prices.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/239/239932.jpg
Nice read speeds!
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246171.jpg
At first I was like "I'm not sure I trust Intel's definition of affordable" but these are actually very good values.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156133.jpg
Moderator
I would throw one of these in my XPS in a heart beat!
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
Hmm very good pricing for Intel based ssds considering those ssds cost an arm and a leg. I have yet to purchase an M2 SATA drive for my PC. I may get one and clone my boot drive on to it and use the m2 as the boot drive for the speed.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/247/247476.jpg
WOW, hats off Intel, that was unexpected. Been a long time since somebody used the terms Intel and affordable in a sentence ๐Ÿ™‚ Really interesting product. Don't even want to think about the purchase of 2 Samsung 850 EVOs that I made two months ago... :bang:
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/262/262190.jpg
But they all have low endurance of 72 TBW even the 1TB model. For the 128 GB is understandable, but the same for a 1 TB model, that is bad...
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
But they all have low endurance of 72 TBW even the 1TB model. For the 128 GB is understandable, but the same for a 1 TB model, that is bad...
I was thinking of posting that there must be a catch to those prices. lol Thanks for pointing it out. :thumbup:
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/259/259654.jpg
But they all have low endurance of 72 TBW even the 1TB model. For the 128 GB is understandable, but the same for a 1 TB model, that is bad...
That's a good catch. They also have full capacity, which means that there is not secret space (like 120GB/240GB SSDs have), where you get more write redundancy.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196284.jpg
The write speeds aren't impressive at all....
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/232/232130.jpg
The write speeds aren't impressive at all....
Good luck capping them ๐Ÿ™‚ I would love to have one for system. RIP welcome screen.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242134.jpg
@Pictus most long term use will see chips failing first, because of age, not write cycles. even for cheap consumer ssds...
data/avatar/default/avatar37.webp
Wait... That 100 mw while active is writing and reading ? if so that's a huge step forward. That compares to 3W to 5W or more of other drives.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/218/218363.jpg
Wonder how hot these get. Seen other M2s get over 110 degrees warm.
data/avatar/default/avatar07.webp
Wait... That 100 mw while active is writing and reading ? if so that's a huge step forward. That compares to 3W to 5W or more of other drives.
Yeah that seems a bit off to me. If true, it would mean if you have a miserly 50W to spare on your power supply you could hypothetically run 500 1 TB drives active as in reading and writing simultaenously and still be okay.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
@Pictus most long term use will see chips failing first, because of age, not write cycles. even for cheap consumer ssds...
True. My Sammy 950 is about 6-7 months old and used as my main drive and I have written just 3.07TB so far. I haven't of course been doing anything taxing so I assume others should be higher but still that's like 10-12 years for that 72TBW based on my usage. So for "normal" use that Intel's TBW seems good enough. Still a catch tho compared to the other drivers but not a bad one.
data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp
Is it possible to do RAID 0 with 2 x 600p NVMe SSDs Is it possible to do RAID 0 with 2 x 600p NVMe SSDs
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115710.jpg
True. My Sammy 950 is about 6-7 months old and used as my main drive and I have written just 3.07TB so far. I haven't of course been doing anything taxing so I assume others should be higher but still that's like 10-12 years for that 72TBW based on my usage. So for "normal" use that Intel's TBW seems good enough. Still a catch tho compared to the other drivers but not a bad one.
72TWB is just fine and should last easily till it's obsolete. My Samsung 830 has over 11TB host writes and it's still doing just fine.
data/avatar/default/avatar07.webp
But they all have low endurance of 72 TBW even the 1TB model. For the 128 GB is understandable, but the same for a 1 TB model, that is bad...
from where you get those rated endurance ? if the endurance that low, it seems they using their lowest grade chip the good things they still provide 5years warranty for it... not sure if affordable = value... intel product has been always expensive = high quality/reliability which turn to better value in long term but this one, its more like micron typical product