Intel to Offer Affordable 600p NVMe SSDs

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Intel to Offer Affordable 600p NVMe SSDs on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
That's some serious value there! Almost half price of other equivalent capacity NVME SSD's. The write could been a bit better but oh well. I would love that 1TB version. Hell, I would gladly taken that 512GB Intel 600p NVME SSD over my 256GB 950 PRO anytime! :thumbup:
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248994.jpg
As great as it is to get some competition in the market that only had Samsung devices, it's equally weird to see Intel products with reasonable prices.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/239/239932.jpg
Nice read speeds!
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246171.jpg
At first I was like "I'm not sure I trust Intel's definition of affordable" but these are actually very good values.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156133.jpg
Moderator
I would throw one of these in my XPS in a heart beat!
data/avatar/default/avatar09.webp
Hmm very good pricing for Intel based ssds considering those ssds cost an arm and a leg. I have yet to purchase an M2 SATA drive for my PC. I may get one and clone my boot drive on to it and use the m2 as the boot drive for the speed.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/247/247476.jpg
WOW, hats off Intel, that was unexpected. Been a long time since somebody used the terms Intel and affordable in a sentence ๐Ÿ™‚ Really interesting product. Don't even want to think about the purchase of 2 Samsung 850 EVOs that I made two months ago... :bang:
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/262/262190.jpg
But they all have low endurance of 72 TBW even the 1TB model. For the 128 GB is understandable, but the same for a 1 TB model, that is bad...
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
But they all have low endurance of 72 TBW even the 1TB model. For the 128 GB is understandable, but the same for a 1 TB model, that is bad...
I was thinking of posting that there must be a catch to those prices. lol Thanks for pointing it out. :thumbup:
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/259/259654.jpg
But they all have low endurance of 72 TBW even the 1TB model. For the 128 GB is understandable, but the same for a 1 TB model, that is bad...
That's a good catch. They also have full capacity, which means that there is not secret space (like 120GB/240GB SSDs have), where you get more write redundancy.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196284.jpg
The write speeds aren't impressive at all....
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/232/232130.jpg
The write speeds aren't impressive at all....
Good luck capping them ๐Ÿ™‚ I would love to have one for system. RIP welcome screen.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242134.jpg
@Pictus most long term use will see chips failing first, because of age, not write cycles. even for cheap consumer ssds...
data/avatar/default/avatar06.webp
Wait... That 100 mw while active is writing and reading ? if so that's a huge step forward. That compares to 3W to 5W or more of other drives.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/218/218363.jpg
Wonder how hot these get. Seen other M2s get over 110 degrees warm.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
@Pictus most long term use will see chips failing first, because of age, not write cycles. even for cheap consumer ssds...
True. My Sammy 950 is about 6-7 months old and used as my main drive and I have written just 3.07TB so far. I haven't of course been doing anything taxing so I assume others should be higher but still that's like 10-12 years for that 72TBW based on my usage. So for "normal" use that Intel's TBW seems good enough. Still a catch tho compared to the other drivers but not a bad one.
data/avatar/default/avatar33.webp
Is it possible to do RAID 0 with 2 x 600p NVMe SSDs Is it possible to do RAID 0 with 2 x 600p NVMe SSDs
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115710.jpg
True. My Sammy 950 is about 6-7 months old and used as my main drive and I have written just 3.07TB so far. I haven't of course been doing anything taxing so I assume others should be higher but still that's like 10-12 years for that 72TBW based on my usage. So for "normal" use that Intel's TBW seems good enough. Still a catch tho compared to the other drivers but not a bad one.
72TWB is just fine and should last easily till it's obsolete. My Samsung 830 has over 11TB host writes and it's still doing just fine.
data/avatar/default/avatar22.webp
But they all have low endurance of 72 TBW even the 1TB model. For the 128 GB is understandable, but the same for a 1 TB model, that is bad...
from where you get those rated endurance ? if the endurance that low, it seems they using their lowest grade chip the good things they still provide 5years warranty for it... not sure if affordable = value... intel product has been always expensive = high quality/reliability which turn to better value in long term but this one, its more like micron typical product
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196284.jpg
from where you get those rated endurance ? if the endurance that low, it seems they using their lowest grade chip the good things they still provide 5years warranty for it... not sure if affordable = value... intel product has been always expensive = high quality/reliability which turn to better value in long term but this one, its more like micron typical product
72TBW isn't bad at all for a consumer grade product. The drive will be obsolete long before it fails due to write cycles. I'd venture to say the average consumer is writing less than 5TB per year.....giving this drive a 14.4 year life span. How many people keep a drive that long? Most of us don't keep a harddrive longer than 5 years. There's a higher risk of circuit failure than there is NAND failure during it's usable life span.