Intel Kaby Lake Core i5-7600K Spotted (Photo)

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Intel Kaby Lake Core i5-7600K Spotted (Photo) on our message forum
#5347035
data/avatar/default/avatar16.webp
I am seriously hoping for a K-SKU for an i3...
#5347045
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
So, another i5 another quad core, meh. Zen looks more and more appealing.
#5347046
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/180/180081.jpg
Quadcore with boost of 200mhz? How is that a thing? No doubt also a 10% price increase at launch over the 6000 series. Intel again shafting everyone because of lack of competition in the highend segment.
#5347098
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/123/123440.jpg
Intel will impress me when they release a CPU with 40 PCIe lanes that is NOT $600.00 US dollars. Plus another $200+ for a 16x16x motherboard. I can build an entire gaming PC for 600$ dollars.... probably less with monitor, keyboard, mouse etc.... and a game...
#5347121
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/88/88194.jpg
Intel will impress me when they release a CPU with 40 PCIe lanes that is NOT $600.00 US dollars. Plus another $200+ for a 16x16x motherboard. I can build an entire gaming PC for 600$ dollars.... probably less with monitor, keyboard, mouse etc.... and a game...
Why do you think PCI-E lanes are so important for gaming? Did you every try to benchmark 16+16 vs. 8+8 with PCI-E 3.0 cards? I would be surprised if the difference is distinctly higher than the random measurement noise and also high enough to justify even a 100 USD difference in prices (because those lanes might actually make those motherboards more expensive to manufacture). I didn't notice my solo 290X slowing down when I plugged in a 8x network card and this old CPU has PCI-E 2.0 only (3.0 is ~80% faster, so that should cover for any CrossFire overhead).
#5347125
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
5GHZ @ 1.50v, auch.. I wonder what kind temps it has by load, that coretemp clearly shows it only by idle. lol 😀 Probably not stable anyway, just to showoff it can "boot & run" at 5GHz.
#5347140
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/175/175902.jpg
I am seriously hoping for a K-SKU for an i3...
and a celeron k ... and a pentium k 🙂 (btw i had lot of fun with my pentium aniversary, and it still work lol) in fact the perfect thing would be a complete K line for us 😛c1:
#5347144
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/175/175902.jpg
Why do you think PCI-E lanes are so important for gaming? Did you every try to benchmark 16+16 vs. 8+8 with PCI-E 3.0 cards?
agree and even in xfire 16+4 (tested) of course if you have 2 OC titan x... then maybe you will have bottleneck or stuttering with your pentium at 4k... lol oups it's due to CPU only and maybe i am joking about some lol
#5347214
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/123/123440.jpg
Why do you think PCI-E lanes are so important for gaming? Did you every try to benchmark 16+16 vs. 8+8 with PCI-E 3.0 cards? I would be surprised if the difference is distinctly higher than the random measurement noise and also high enough to justify even a 100 USD difference in prices (because those lanes might actually make those motherboards more expensive to manufacture). I didn't notice my solo 290X slowing down when I plugged in a 8x network card and this old CPU has PCI-E 2.0 only (3.0 is ~80% faster, so that should cover for any CrossFire overhead).
I noticed stuttering when trying to do 4k res in 8x 8x, also gaming in ultra and 4k and using 3-6x24 monitors 16x16x is a HUGE difference compared to 8x8x. My Monitor Setup...
#5347223
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/88/88194.jpg
I noticed stuttering when trying to do 4k res in 8x 8x, also gaming in ultra and 4k and using 3-6x24 monitors 16x16x is a HUGE difference compared to 8x8x. My Monitor Setup...
Well, 4k needs 4 times the bandwidth (compared to 2k) and AMD dropped the dedicated bridge instead of widening it like nVidia, so I guess I can believe that. Although, I would not be surprised if this is just yet another multi-GPU anomaly and the high bandwidth requirement is more of bug (something about the sub-optimal handling of this communication).
#5347229
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/208/208541.jpg
Intel will impress me when they release a CPU with 40 PCIe lanes that is NOT $600.00 US dollars. Plus another $200+ for a 16x16x motherboard. I can build an entire gaming PC for 600$ dollars.... probably less with monitor, keyboard, mouse etc.... and a game...
There is no big diffrence between 16/16 and 8/8 in most cases. I checked it back when i had dual 780's and i gained maybe 2-3fps more on 16/16 config on an X79 Mobo of a friend.
#5347230
data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp
So, another i5 another quad core, meh. Zen looks more and more appealing.
For what workload? Kaby will **** all over Zen when it comes to gaming.
#5347263
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
If real, I would expect it to actually be stable at those clocks since intell did boast that their new 14nm++ has a larger pictch, which in theory should allow a quit a bit higher clocks do trough less heat issues.
Stability aside, its still 1.50v and that is a lot. I've read Skylake can degrade faster after 1.42v, so its better to stay bellow 1.40v..
#5347266
data/avatar/default/avatar12.webp
Yay. Cant wait to change the whole pc for a 5% perf increase. And can do 5ghz! Just like the 6 years old sandy. Probably not as stable as sandy.
#5347315
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242134.jpg
@Ryrynz maybe google to update your info. a lot of recently released/upcoming games will perform better on 6-8 (or more) cores, so have fun with a quad core in 2016, when i had that from amd in 2008... as long as game res is 1080/higher on single/maybe two cards, the single core performance of a cpu is almost getting irrelevant, so not really a gain for intel. and im not shelling out 700+ to get a 6 core intel + MB, which is clearly a ripoff. so unless zen is slower than my 3770k, by by intel..
#5347333
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/186/186763.jpg
Really interested in how these OC. If there as good as the rumours suggest I just hope I have enough money by in the new year to buy one and make it cold 😉
#5347351
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/145/145154.jpg
Will we ever see a massive performance leap from Intel again? What is it now, 7 years of incremental increases?
#5347377
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196003.jpg
Will we ever see a massive performance leap from Intel again? What is it now, 7 years of incremental increases?
If there is competition for them, one would assume so.
#5347404
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/166/166706.jpg
Quadcore with boost of 200mhz? How is that a thing? No doubt also a 10% price increase at launch over the 6000 series. Intel again shafting everyone because of lack of competition in the highend segment.
200 mark is actually a thing, when i watch a 720p movie on my brand new cherry trail z8300 14nm tablet it overheats so much to the point when mouse cursor slows down, video stutters, audio distorts and cpu cant keep 200Mhz even. Weird because my tablet i had before with 22nm quad core atom also was very hot but played the same video just fine. Both of them cooled by the pcb i presume.
#5347405
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Really interested in how these OC. If there as good as the rumours suggest I just hope I have enough money by in the new year to buy one and make it cold 😉
Overcloking question on these CPU's is mute. I mean 7700k is already boosting at 4.5ghz, how much more do you think it will go? Clock to clock i would expect 5-10% over Skylake at best.

Next Page