Intel Core i9-11900K processor review
Click here to post a comment for Intel Core i9-11900K processor review on our message forum
terror_adagio
Rocket Lake is trying to make something good out of a bad situation. They got back what they wanted gaming from what I can see from various reviews. The fact they got this much out of 14nm is impressive. I'm surprised how well it competes with MT with less cores/threads too.
I think the lower parts are more interesting right now especially with the GPU shortage situation. I'd rather have Rocket Lake with its newer onboard GPU if I had to wait for a new GPU.
Looking more forward to Alder Lake
Netherwind
Not too great but on the other hand I think that peoples expectations of Intel are pretty low nowadays when AMD has gained so much. Unfortunately AMD has done several mistakes too with latest Zen launch and avoiding them might have would probably have made even less people look at Intel for gaming. The real battle vs AMD will be with Alder Lake no doubt, this release was just to keep everything afloat.
SpajdrEX
We missing min.fps in graphs where new Intel really shine, good job Intel.
Undying
Indeed very good job intel. You lost two cores and you lost to amd once again. Thats a progress right there. Next please.
schmidtbag
If you ignore power consumption, I'd consider this pretty good - it's only slightly slower than the 10900K despite lacking a pair of cores. But yikes... that power consumption is atrocious. I'm sure it's a similar situation to the Ryzen 3000 series, where roughly 15W are due to PCIe 4.0, but that only explains the higher idle wattage. Under load though, that's a whole other situation. It's pretty bad when CPUs with more than double the amount of cores are the only ones more power hungry.
SpajdrEX
M.2 disk on PCIE 4.0 intel shows nice boost compared to AMD
https://pctuning.tyden.cz/hardware/procesory-pameti/61989-intel-core-i911900k-a-core-i711700k-v-testu?start=14
Kaarme
terror_adagio
Why are most reviews ignoring the new iGPU? I mean, we are in a GPU shortage right now you think that would be important.
BReal85
MonstroMart
mackintosh
Well, it's pretty much what we've been expecting. If you're desperate to upgrade this cycle, this is as good as it's going to get. By the time either the 5900X or the 5950X are available in volume and at sane prices, it's going to be all over for both platforms.
terror_adagio
FrostNixon
Truly a waste of sand.
Chrysalis
Interesting set of data.
On one hand graphs shows IPC has started to accelerate with newer cpu gens now from both AMD and intel, this is good.
However Intel's power draw is getting crazy, vs my 9900k which is also 14nm, the 11900k with same core count uses 50% more power, thats madness.
schmidtbag
user1
the most interesting part of this review is that intel was unable to keep the memeory latency down on a monolithic die vs amd's chiplets, I have many many questions.
ruiner13
https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_9_5900x_and_5950x_review,21.html
I don't think the memory read chart is accurate. The Ryzen 5000 series scores are about 15K too high based on your review and my own sample. kapu
Power efficiency is very bad on these but if you don't care this they are not bad especially for given price and that Amd is charing premium...
https://tpucdn.com/review/intel-core-i5-11600k/images/efficiency-multithread.png
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
bobnewels
Thanks for the review. I checked the stores in my area and the 11900K is in stock and is $120+ bucks more than 5800X. Then 10900K is $100+ less than 5800X. IF you want Intel I suggest go for the deals on 10900K,all the CPU's I mentioned are awesome for PC gamers with the best GPU's. Do not have the best GPU, get a cheaper CPU,no need to waste cash on the new shinny suff.