Intel Core i9-10900K at defaults stressed, Power Consumption Reads 235W, Temperatures hits 93°C

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Intel Core i9-10900K at defaults stressed, Power Consumption Reads 235W, Temperatures hits 93°C on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258664.jpg
uhm... this thing reaches 93°C even using an AIO? o_O
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/72/72485.jpg
Expected. Not sure how anyone can really get excited for the 10000000 14++++++ series unless you have money to blow and want the highest 3d mark score. Just wait for a full fledged next generation.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
250w and 93c chip. Its really hard to justify those few extra fps at 1080p at this point.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270288.jpg
thats not sounding too good
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/195/195639.jpg
seeing how my temp is always way higher than review site due to hot weather at where i live, this thing will go over 100c using AIO
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243189.jpg
Interesting reading - I await your review HH
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196426.jpg
Doing some experimentation with a recently purchased Blue Yeti microphone: https://soundcloud.com/wavetrex-infinity/i9-10900k (It's this article read by myself)
yeti-tonor.jpg
Opinions ? Should I speak slower or quicker ? Should I put more bass ? Or too much already ? Anything else that I -can- do to improve the quality ?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/232/232130.jpg
kekw send nukes
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
wavetrex:

Doing some experimentation with a recently purchased Blue Yeti microphone: https://soundcloud.com/wavetrex-infinity/i9-10900k (It's this article read by myself)
yeti-tonor.jpg
Opinions ? Should I speak slower or quicker ? Should I put more bass ? Or too much already ? Anything else that I -can- do to improve the quality ?
Faster. You are not reading it to idiots. Too long spaces between words where it is not expected. And missing spaces after end of sentences. Your intonation got much better towards the end. Otherwise great quality.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196426.jpg
Fox2232:

Faster. You are not reading it to idiots. Too long spaces between words where it is not expected. And missing spaces after end of sentences. Your intonation got much better towards the end. Otherwise great quality.
Thanks ! Will do more rehearsal before the next read, this one was at first read (really!). That's probably why the long unexpected spaces and monotone intonation... It will be interesting to see the improvements after several days of reading stuff ;-) I'm a computer programmer, I barely ever use my voice, 99% of my work and communication with the outside world is by typing and reading... not speaking and listening 🙄
data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp
This is literally FX 9590 with 10 excavator cores. LITERALLY! pre zen tactics
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
wavetrex:

Thanks ! Will do more rehearsal before the next read, this one was at first read (really!). That's probably why the long unexpected spaces and monotone intonation... It will be interesting to see the improvements after several days of reading stuff ;-) I'm a computer programmer, I barely ever use my voice, 99% of my work and communication with the outside world is by typing and reading... not speaking and listening 🙄
Then results are rather good. I have heard audio books with incomparably worse reading. I tend to believe, you can improve on intonation.
data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp
- no one serious would use a 240mm on a 9900k and certainly not a cpu with +2 cores 280mm was okay 360mm recommended - considering they started with the wrong cooler I sense a bad mounting or poor thermal paste appliance which both usually result in 90°C - 235 watts seems way too much if that's true then it will look really bad compared to amd and well it will be Intel's own fault - "work" cpu that can also game is amd territory now they cannot compete so they shouldn't have tried - they should have kept to 8 cores and try to improve them as "gaming king" 10 are useless for light non-work use and you have to use cpu affinity to reduce the amount of cores used by games as most can only handle 4-8 cores anyway (you get stuttering, freezes or lower fps if you allow more than that) - why do they keep pushing for more cores PLUS faster clock speeds, it makes zero sense (AMD did the same if you remember) more cores should equal slower speeds and lower cores faster speed which would make Intel unbeatable for gaming if true then they will have shot themselves in the foot, the temporary turbo boost feature was a great idea it's used in most turbo cars nowadays to give you an initial "kick" in acceleration which makes sense in gaming as games often have heavy parts where you suddenly lose 30fps (crowded open spaces) then light parts (corridors) where the cpu is barely used
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/280/280231.jpg
I believe everyone with money to spare, should consider watercooling, or at least learn more about it. Air cooling, even the AIO, is not enough for serious horsepower nowadays, unless you underclock and go for a kinda eco-friendly rig.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270017.jpg
This is even news? I mean this is more a confirmation of what ALL tech savvy folks saw coming 65535 miles away (sorry, can't see any further, I only see in 16-bit here). I said it then I will say it now. INTEL LAVA LAKE processor series inbound! @Hilbert Hagedoorn you've got to use that in your title for the review 🙂 Will really drive the point home.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270017.jpg
itpro:

I believe everyone with money to spare, should consider watercooling, or at least learn more about it. Air cooling, even the AIO, is not enough for serious horsepower nowadays, unless you underclock and go for a kinda eco-friendly rig.
How is (for example) a 3700X not serious horsepower? In all honesty it does as I'd expect it to, and it does all I expect it to with much, MUCH less heat and noise than I assumed going into (building) the whole deal. Even a 3900x you can air-cool - though slightly less effectively than water - you can still do it with general success. Heck even the 3950X + a good Noctua will do just fine provided going in that you know it's not going to clock as high on extended work runs.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/274/274789.jpg
6700k on steroids
data/avatar/default/avatar34.webp
ah...I only realize now that they were running furmark+aid stress test at the same time..we have been duped of course doing that generates crazy power figures, you know what a 1080ti + 3960x threadripper need if I do this ? 850 watts at the psu ! even in a mid-sized living room the temp reached 30°C in no time with such a furnace heating the room (reminded me of my 1mio+ watts at work) 1) ouch if they weren't using an open test bench, knowing that 9/10 AIO are placed on top because of the tubing, something you should NEVER do, google it or check bitwit video (same config +10°C on the cpu in a well ventilated case and without extreme stress testing like here) aio should be placed on the front as intake 2) gpu stress test by themselves use around 50-60% of your cpu if you add another 100% cpu charge with a separate stress test your cpu is going to melt whatever it is 3) that abusive testing will definitely have raised the room temp by quite a bit which will have made the temp worse it's a vicious cycle 4) don't know how they even made it as if I try this on my 9900k I'll crash for sure (you're asking more than 100% cpu usage...) this is probably why the clock was down, this is something you can do "for the lulz" on high cores cpu because they can handle it but it has zero point other than do an extreme stress test of your cooling setup now I get the 240mm cooling it was to add insult to injury in trying to make it look bad what a swindle I'll wait for guru3d review thanks
data/avatar/default/avatar38.webp
kakiharaFRS:

1) ouch if they weren't using an open test bench, knowing that 9/10 AIO are placed on top because of the tubing, something you should NEVER do, google it or check bitwit video (same config +10°C on the cpu in a well ventilated case and without extreme stress testing like here) aio should be placed on the front as intake 2) gpu stress test by themselves use around 50-60% of your cpu if you add another 100% cpu charge with a separate stress test your cpu is going to melt whatever it is 3) 4)
No. It's not that. 230 Watts power is because of AIDA stress test using AVX. And because new Intel CPU can run in higher PL2 state for extended period of time before switching to PL1.