GeForce GTX TITAN-X 3DMark Benchmarks Surface

Published by

Click here to post a comment for GeForce GTX TITAN-X 3DMark Benchmarks Surface on our message forum
#5026630
data/avatar/default/avatar16.webp
I think it was pretty obvious what was going on since the release of the 970/980. I mean, did anyone wonder why the 970/980 were released w/ such attractive prices? When was the last time a card was released with a pricetag that's LESS than the previous generation's card of the same category upon its release? The answer is simple: AMD is gonna leapfrog Nvidia for this generation, and Nvidia knows it. This is why it's been trying to capture as much market share as possible before AMD releases its 300 series. The reasoning goes that if someone already splurged on a 980, it's less likely that they'll upgrade to a 390X half a year later. My suspicions were strong when 970/980 were released with surprisingly appealing prices, and now they're almost confirmed with this lackluster Titan X performance. The problem, of course, is that AMD knows this too, and you can bet that they'll milk the performance crown as much as they can until Nvidia catches up. This means that the 300 series will be pretty friggin expensive when they come out.
#5026633
data/avatar/default/avatar15.webp
I think it was pretty obvious what was going on since the release of the 970/980. I mean, did anyone wonder why the 970/980 were released w/ such attractive prices? When was the last time a card was released with a pricetag that's LESS than the previous generation's card of the same category upon its release? The answer is simple: AMD is gonna leapfrog Nvidia for this generation, and Nvidia knows it. This is why it's been trying to capture as much market share as possible before AMD releases its 300 series. The reasoning goes that if someone already splurged on a 980, it's less likely that they'll upgrade to a 390X half a year later. My suspicions were strong when 970/980 were released with surprisingly appealing prices, and now they're almost confirmed with this lackluster Titan X performance. The problem, of course, is that AMD knows this too, and you can bet that they'll milk the performance crown as much as they can until Nvidia catches up. This means that the 300 series will be pretty friggin expensive when they come out.
If the 300 series of cards is so expensive, like titan style expensive, who will buy it? Dont they need to cut prices and price competitively to get back market share?
#5026657
data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp
[spoiler] http://www.benchmark.pl/uploads/backend_img/b/fotki_newsy/2015-03/PM/nvidia-geforce-gtx-titan-x-karta-graficzna-wydajnosc-1.jpg http://www.benchmark.pl/uploads/backend_img/b/fotki_newsy/2015-03/PM/nvidia-geforce-gtx-titan-x-karta-graficzna-wydajnosc-2.jpg[/spoiler] I'm impressed 🙂
benchmarks are hardly needed just add one GTX 960 on top of GTX 980 980 performance: adding 1 additional GM206 on top of GTX 960 results in 90% geometry scaling. Assuming same/similar clocks and to get Titan X performance just take GTX 980 and add another GM206 with ~80% scaling 80% x 0.5 = 0.4 40% faster voila!
#5026668
data/avatar/default/avatar30.webp
It was a mistake. $7,994 was the price for one and $24,064 for 4. See, you get a discount for 4.
#5026672
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/175/175902.jpg
390X will be the better card because it will be cheaper. 1000 bucks for a card? The world has gone insane
mine is around 6k buck (without the tesla of course) but it's for work, i play on my htpc with lot less (but enough) power... depend on your need/desire... titan was an 50% fail as entry level pro card (for a pro card is really cheap) but gamer like it to play... so why not have a success as a gamer GPU?
#5026676
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/163/163560.jpg
Impressive numbers but I just know the price is going to be just stupid. Guess I'll be hanging on for the 1080 or what ever they call the Titan X with 6GB ram like they did with the 780's. One of those should hold me off for a while.
#5026695
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/254/254725.jpg
690 was same price in May 2012, you get a lot of card for your money.
The 690 was a beast for sure but, it seems like they've been avoiding a more affordable dual card having skipped it for two generations.
#5026702
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/232/232349.jpg
390X will be the better card because it will be cheaper. 1000 bucks for a card? The world has gone insane
The way I see it is that people pay for what they want. Someone wants to game at 4k with all the bells and whistles turned on then they're going to have to pay for that. The standard (I guess) today is 1080p, so if you want more than that it'll cost more. And if one card can offer the experience of what multiple had to do before I'd have to say that is pretty remarkable. We have time to see what these new cards are fully capable of. I'm truly interested in the DX12 architecture behind these new beauties.....
#5026784
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/231/231931.jpg
I've waited along time for the right card to come along tbh. This is the one for me running at 1440 100hz. Price has to be no more than £1000. Anymore than that and I'm out.
I want a titan x msi lightning + h20, that would be nice.
#5026788
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/181/181778.jpg
390X will be the better card because it will be cheaper. 1000 bucks for a card? The world has gone insane
If u like heat and crappy driver support then be my guest.
#5026793
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
If u like heat and crappy driver support then be my guest.
AMD's driver support hasn't been crappy in forever. Stop clinging to old nonsense. This isn't even to mention that the Titan is a 300w card, probably the same with the 390x.
#5026809
data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp
Still don't get the oddish, 384-bit-wide memory bus (although cutting corners there is par for nVidia and certainly not new for the company)...I would think this would be a premium product with essentially a ridiculously high price that only an asylum inmate could love...;)...so why not swallow the extra pins and go to 512-bits wide for the on-board local ram bus...? Makes sense especially after the latest nVidia debacle of selling 4GB cards the bus can't fully address because it isn't wide enough (only 3.5GBs out of the 4GBs onboard in the 980/970's.) I assume nVidia won't want to do that again--especially not in an ultra-premium-priced product...(but these specs are probably fake, after all...!)
Wow... How wildly ignorant of you... You do realize that the memory issue only effects the 970 and NOT the 980... Or are you too busy vilifying Nvidia to remember that point? I agree that Nvidia dropped the ball with the whole 970 issue but maybe getting your facts straight would help to further people listening to what you have to say instead of instantly recognizing that you obviously harbor negative biases towards Nvidia (to the point of making false claims). It just ruins your credibility on forums such as these. Think about it next time...
#5026816
data/avatar/default/avatar36.webp
I am curious how well the Titan X overclocks and what its thermals are like.
#5026819
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/228/228512.jpg
AMD's driver support hasn't been crappy in forever. Stop clinging to old nonsense. This isn't even to mention that the Titan is a 300w card, probably the same with the 390x.
When was the last time AMD released a driver.... Yeah, December.... 😕
#5026822
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
When was the last time AMD released a driver.... Yeah, December.... 😕
So? Is there some kind of issue? Performance problem some place? Is a new driver actually needed anywhere? My friend as a 290x, we play all the same games, including newer ones like Evolved. No issues. I don't see the problem.
#5026832
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/228/228512.jpg
So? Is there some kind of issue? Performance problem some place? Is a new driver actually needed anywhere? My friend as a 290x, we play all the same games, including newer ones like Evolved. No issues. I don't see the problem.
Dying Light and Crossfire? FarCry 4 no Crossfire support at all? etc etc.
#5026838
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/52/52796.jpg
So? Is there some kind of issue? Performance problem some place? Is a new driver actually needed anywhere? My friend as a 290x, we play all the same games, including newer ones like Evolved. No issues. I don't see the problem.
Lots of PEBKAC and people who don't own AMD products to be honest. It's great that there's a new Nvidia flagship coming out and I can't wait to see what it can do, but some will take every chance they get to shat all over AMD, since why not?
#5026847
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248203.jpg
Lots of PEBKAC and people who don't own AMD products to be honest. It's great that there's a new Nvidia flagship coming out and I can't wait to see what it can do, but some will take every chance they get to shat all over AMD, since why not?
yes there are those that bash at every turn but there is a number of owners that are getting frustrated with AMD's driver cycle. and to write if off as PEBKAC looks familiar to the frame pacing issue of a few years ago; that AMD did a fantastic job correcting i may add.
#5026879
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248627.jpg
I cant speak for crossfire but ive owned apu's and currently own a hd 6670 and ive never ever had a problem other then when i ran the two together frame times where terrible.

Previous Page

Next Page