Fallout 4: Real-Life vs In-Game Boston

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Fallout 4: Real-Life vs In-Game Boston on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
I'm running 2880x1620 MAXXED OUT and my graphics are not near good as in that video!? Am I missing something? Or is that video just a showcase one from developer options/High AA modes for showing purposes only?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/66/66219.jpg
TAA + SweetFX lumasharpen makes this game look A LOT better. Although looks like that video is just 4k.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/236/236838.jpg
I'm playing at 1080p in a GTX680 and in some parts this game looks photorealistic, but I did fine-tune on brightness, color, contrast, horizontal and vertical sharpness on my TV.
data/avatar/default/avatar07.webp
I'm running 2880x1620 MAXXED OUT and my graphics are not near good as in that video!? Am I missing something? Or is that video just a showcase one from developer options/High AA modes for showing purposes only?
Mine looks about like that, as far as I remember, I'm runnign 3440x1440. (I'm at work right now.
data/avatar/default/avatar11.webp
looks like crap 🙂
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/254/254969.jpg
looks like crap 🙂
+1 :puke2:
data/avatar/default/avatar37.webp
The game has very good graphical immersion via, lighting/LIGHTNING/rain, mist/fog etc.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56686.jpg
I might be alone on this but the In game and real llife look nothing alike and not even remotely near photo realistic. So the people that say its "wicked close" are blind as bat imo Photorealsim to me is I take photo with an actual camera and the photo i get there is what I would get in Photorealistic game. and seeing as NO game can do that. I really do find the whole "wicked close" comment to be joke. Bottom line they are no where near being "wick close" let alone near or remotely close
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/79/79740.jpg
Bottom line they are no where near being "wick close" let alone near or remotely close
Should they be after a nuke explosion and 200 years of aging?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196549.jpg
Should they be after a nuke explosion and 200 years of aging?
LOL! You beat me to it! +1
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/197/197287.jpg
I might be alone on this but the In game and real llife look nothing alike and not even remotely near photo realistic. So the people that say its "wicked close" are blind as bat imo Photorealsim to me is I take photo with an actual camera and the photo i get there is what I would get in Photorealistic game. and seeing as NO game can do that. I really do find the whole "wicked close" comment to be joke. Bottom line they are no where near being "wick close" let alone near or remotely close
Couple things you gotta remember Fallout 4 (or fallout in general) is in an alternate universe where certain technologies continued and certain technologies never came to exist. This means many things would be different in this world, in general The nukes in fallout fell is 2077, which is in the future, meaning things would look different at that point in time before the nukes went off, even if it wasn't an alternate universe Fallout 4 is in the year 2287, which is far, far in the future, meaning things would look different, decay and etc. However, i agree with you in general. Fallout 4 does not look like it could be real, it's still obviously a game. It'll be quite some time until that changes. The only thing i saw in this that made me go "whoa" was the horse statue. That was the only thing that made me go back and view that scene again so i could compare the real-life version of the statue and the in-game version. But really what i'm trying to say is, even if this game was made 20-30 years from now where we have near-photo realistic games in all aspects, it still wouldn't be comparable because it's not a game that will have everything look the same. Aka, you would never be able to "I take photo with an actual camera and the photo i get there is what I would get in Photorealistic game." because of the nature of this game.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56686.jpg
Couple things you gotta remember Fallout 4 (or fallout in general) is in an alternate universe where certain technologies continued and certain technologies never came to exist. This means many things would be different in this world, in general The nukes in fallout fell is 2077, which is in the future, meaning things would look different at that point in time before the nukes went off, even if it wasn't an alternate universe Fallout 4 is in the year 2287, which is far, far in the future, meaning things would look different, decay and etc. However, i agree with you in general. Fallout 4 does not look like it could be real, it's still obviously a game. It'll be quite some time until that changes. The only thing i saw in this that made me go "whoa" was the horse statue. That was the only thing that made me go back and view that scene again so i could compare the real-life version of the statue and the in-game version. But really what i'm trying to say is, even if this game was made 20-30 years from now where we have near-photo realistic games in all aspects, it still wouldn't be comparable because it's not a game that will have everything look the same. Aka, you would never be able to "I take photo with an actual camera and the photo i get there is what I would get in Photorealistic game." because of the nature of this game.
I talking in general not just this game all games, it no even remotely close to the "wickedly close" comment. even with keepin in mind it post alt world are not. "Wickedly close" to me mean you look in game an real life and barely noticed diffrence. which is not the case
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
I talking in general not just this game all games, it no even remotely close to the "wickedly close" comment. even with keepin in mind it post alt world are not. "Wickedly close" to me mean you look in game an real life and barely noticed diffrence. which is not the case
Remind me to never let you review anything i make... lol Jokes aside, i think the pursuit of photorealistic graphics or "graphics that look like real life" is a pipedream, games are getting better looking graphically speaking but there are so many more visual factors that developers have not or can not recreate - depending on what you believe to be lacking if it isnt the graphics nailing it perfectly it'll be the audio, if its not the audio its the physics, if its not the physics it'll be the NPC AI, and this would go on and on and on. we as gamers will never truly be 100% satisfied with the graphics of a game being 100% lifelike. there are too many things we unconsciously experience with our eyesight that games will never truly be able to reproduce. With this point in mind we should appreciate the game for what it is: a good game with fantastic visuals.