Eying an AMD A520 motherboard? Well, they're coming.

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Eying an AMD A520 motherboard? Well, they're coming. on our message forum
#5796185
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246171.jpg
That's a whole lotta SKUs for a product that isn't going to sell very well...
#5796221
data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp
Considering most ryzen zen 2 chips dont overclock as high as their boost (not counting 3600), a520 should be sufficient for most people, unless A520 will limit ram / fclk speeds too
#5796447
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/50/50906.jpg
Perfect fit for a mini-PC with a 4400GE with 16GB of dual channel RAM.
#5796497
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/175/175902.jpg
schmidtbag:

That's a whole lotta SKUs for a product that isn't going to sell very well...
the A320 was the best sold chipset in AM4 despite that you can get B450 for generaly around 20 Euro more and everything better with it. the B450 have just passed in front when the X570 appear in shop.
#5796498
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/175/175902.jpg
Ssateneth:

Considering most ryzen zen 2 chips dont overclock as high as their boost
i don't have any problem to stay locked at boost speed and more on load...and i am in "auto" in nearly everything in bios. really an easy CPU.
#5796525
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246171.jpg
rl66:

the A320 was the best sold chipset in AM4 despite that you can get B450 for generaly around 20 Euro more and everything better with it. the B450 have just passed in front when the X570 appear in shop.
For PC builders or OEMs? Because I could see how OEMs would buy the A320 all the time, because they don't tend to support overclocking anyway and they just want a basic functioning system. But for most home builders, sometimes it's as little as $10 more for a B350 or B450, where I don't get why anyone would buy A320.
#5796527
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/50/50906.jpg
schmidtbag:

For PC builders or OEMs? Because I could see how OEMs would buy the A320 all the time, because they don't tend to support overclocking anyway and they just want a basic functioning system. But for most home builders, sometimes it's as little as $10 more for a B350 or B450, where I don't get why anyone would buy A320.
I think that AMD's priority is to have better numbers, so why not release a highly successful chipset just because home builders will prefer to spend a little bit more for a better solution?
#5796541
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/268/268248.jpg
schmidtbag:

For PC builders or OEMs? Because I could see how OEMs would buy the A320 all the time, because they don't tend to support overclocking anyway and they just want a basic functioning system. But for most home builders, sometimes it's as little as $10 more for a B350 or B450, where I don't get why anyone would buy A320.
Yep oems use a loooot a320
#5796574
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/175/175902.jpg
schmidtbag:

For PC builders or OEMs? where I don't get why anyone would buy A320.
Most OEM are still Intel, but both yes and most on APU (Ryzen G 3 or 5). And i don't get why myself... but people does (exemple when i bough my B450 it was the only box while there was 10 A320 box when the shop recieved parts)
#5796618
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/47/47825.jpg
schmidtbag:

For PC builders or OEMs? Because I could see how OEMs would buy the A320 all the time, because they don't tend to support overclocking anyway and they just want a basic functioning system. But for most home builders, sometimes it's as little as $10 more for a B350 or B450, where I don't get why anyone would buy A320.
I used an A320 for an office build a few months back. At the time B350-B450 were a lot more than that at least here in my part of Canada.
#5796684
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/50/50906.jpg
jbmcmillan:

I used an A320 for an office build a few months back. At the time B350-B450 were a lot more than that at least here in my part of Canada.
For any normal person, or office build, there is absolutely no improvement from A320 to B350, so why spend more, even if it's just a few bucks.
#5796762
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/47/47825.jpg
heffeque:

For any normal person, or office build, there is absolutely no improvement from A320 to B350, so why spend more, even if it's just a few bucks.
Exactly this was for email office and web browsing for a very small business so economy was at the forefront lol.
#5796883
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246171.jpg
heffeque:

I think that AMD's priority is to have better numbers, so why not release a highly successful chipset just because home builders will prefer to spend a little bit more for a better solution?
Again... I'm not asking why the chipset is released, I'm asking why a single mobo manufacturer is releasing so many variants with it...
#5796924
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/50/50906.jpg
Because people want the cheapest, yet the one that ticks all their boxes.
#5797039
data/avatar/default/avatar09.webp
Just like with some people with b550 I don't see some people purchasing A520 boards either because they are releasing far too late and they already have something they are happy with or have something better on the radar that they want to purchase.