EU Could Cripple future graphics cards

Published by

Click here to post a comment for EU Could Cripple future graphics cards on our message forum
data/avatar/default/avatar20.webp
Am i missing something, its only for discrete and Integrated isn't it, so won't affect us.
What do you think discrete means?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/229/229509.jpg
THis is getting ridiculous now, damn beaurocracy.. Sooner the UK has a referendum to get out of the EU the better.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/245/245380.jpg
It is such a blessing to be in the European Union - e place where dreams come true, where crime and poverty are nonexistent, where everyone's happy! /massive sarcasm So I guess devs and hardware manufacturors will focus on non-EU countries now...
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/217/217316.jpg
Oh so now it's "could cripple". Original article @[Nordic Hardware Exclusive] stated EU cripples future graphics cards Of course this PRELIMINARY REPORT that NordicHardware's full-retard scribble points to, still has nothing to do with imposing 320GB/s Bandwidth upper limit. Let me repeat that: NH IS FULL OF $#&*, THERE ARE NO MENTIONS OF UPPER BW LIMIT IN THE REPORT WHATSOEVER
This is absolutely correct, nowhere in the linked report is any of this mentioned. But no one else actually reads these things. They just read headlines.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/55/55855.jpg
What do you think discrete means?
Yeah thats what i missed :P
data/avatar/default/avatar40.webp
This is absolutely correct, nowhere in the linked report is any of this mentioned. But no one else actually reads these things. They just read headlines.
Its funny how that post went completely unnoticed by every subsequent poster until your quote. Seems like most gurus still can't read properly!
data/avatar/default/avatar33.webp
There is a mention of 320GB/s, in this working document, and only so far to classify PC with such GPU, and to actually exempt it from regulations (kWh/year) .
data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp
Am i missing something, its only for discrete and Integrated isn't it, so won't affect us.
isnt discrete what we have?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/217/217316.jpg
Its funny how that post went completely unnoticed by every subsequent poster until your quote. Seems like most gurus still can't read properly!
The most famous example is when they thought the start menu for Windows 8 had been completely removed. So many people "WELL MICROSOFT HOW AM I GONNA LAUNCH ANYTHING?"
data/avatar/default/avatar25.webp
DW guys we'll import our 8990s and 790s and overclock them in sli/xfire still and we'll use 1200watt psus because we can and because they tell us we can't. Stupid law gets ignored 🙂 I was straining with rage when reading this story and it became the first ever news story that made me fart accidentally.
data/avatar/default/avatar37.webp
Oh so now it's "could cripple". Original article @[Nordic Hardware Exclusive] stated EU cripples future graphics cards Of course this PRELIMINARY REPORT that NordicHardware's full-retard scribble points to, still has nothing to do with imposing 320GB/s Bandwidth upper limit. Let me repeat that: NH IS FULL OF $#&*, THERE ARE NO MENTIONS OF UPPER BW LIMIT IN THE REPORT WHATSOEVER
So we should take the bandwidth upper limit statement to be from an anonymous source.
NordicHardware has seen exclusive information
Yeah that is pretty much all we can take from the article. It is clear that the linked report is not the exclusive information they are talking about since it wouldn't be exclusive if it was. "Exclusive information" is pretty much the same as "anonymous source." So, I mean, that is standard fare for online news now anyways. Well, most of the time anonymous sources are full of...
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/241/241601.jpg
since im in the ****yest country in the europ were never gonna enter eu so fu.k the law.
data/avatar/default/avatar26.webp
Stupid EU The sooner we get a vote on our place in the EU the better for the UK. I know how I am voting, 100% out! For this I am now going to add another HD 5850 along with my current two and burn extra power, SCREW YOU EU!
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/235/235398.jpg
Don't worry, I'll happily ship any graphics cards over to the EU countries for a nominal fee!
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/224/224796.jpg
If this was a TDP/Wattage limitation then I could at least understand the logic behind it; as it is, this makes very little sense at all. :/
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/55/55855.jpg
Will hit the likes of OcUK massively 😀
data/avatar/default/avatar02.webp
There is a mention of 320GB/s, in this working document, and only so far to classify PC with such GPU, and to actually exempt it from regulations (kWh/year) .
Actually the difference is the 320gb/s will be included ( as it was initially the case with the 2009 law, but 320gb/s (G7 strutcute ) was excluded at this time. ) ... The article of NH is really misleading it seems.. basically what is take in account is idle, sleep, off value . ETEC = (8760/1000) * (0.60*Poff + 0.10*Psleep + 0.30*Pidle) where all Px are power values in the indicated mode/state as defined in the definition section, measured in Watts Complete PDF is here http://www.eup-network.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Computers-Draft-Regulation-subject-to-ISC.PDF ( huum maybe on guru3d the link is not write exactly search computers draft regulation subject to ISC
data/avatar/default/avatar24.webp
Actually the difference is the 320gb/s will be included ( as it was initially the case with the 2009 law, but 320gb/s (G7 strutcute ) was excluded at this time. ) ...
Yes it will be included. When and if gets added into Directive, and 30 months after that. God knows what happens in the meantime. Still, there is nothing there about GPU having upper bandwidth limit. But instead bandwidth is used merely as a mean of classification in energy consumption regulation, right? But you sound like you know more... Are you by any chance participating in these Brussels shenanigans :cop:
data/avatar/default/avatar20.webp
This is an old report from back in 2009 that has since been dropped. How is this even news?