Download: 3DMark v2.6.6174 - Adds DirectX 12 Night Raid test

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Download: 3DMark v2.6.6174 - Adds DirectX 12 Night Raid test on our message forum
#5593998
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/245/245459.jpg
Ha, I ran this on my desktop at 300 odd fps! Here's my score: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/29199239? I was surprised to see that it wasn't really CPU limited during the Graphics Tests, it was mostly GPU limited. I was also surprised to see a low frame rate in the CPU test, and the CPU was only used anywhere between 75-92% during that test, so it's not using the CPU properly (that goes for both single core usage & multi core usage, as in none of the threads was maxed out despite the low frame rate).
#5594041
data/avatar/default/avatar19.webp
Dyseman:

http://www.3dmark.com/nr/3462 Base install, No tweaking, Fresh install of 1908, RTX 2080 Ryzen 2700x Meh...
my rtx2080 duke @+98 core i7-8700K @4.9ghz make 54812 points -graf score 121 435, test-1 494.60fps test-2 709.58 fps and cpu 13340 test 43.1 ms...
#5594056
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/165/165326.jpg
Thanks for the heads up Boss , always good to see new updated benchmark software.
#5594108
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/245/245459.jpg
From looking at all our benchmark scores it seems like there are some optimisation issues with this benchmark and our hardware, we might be hitting some kind of platform limitations because score is not scaling well with increased GPU & CPU power - seems like Graphics Score is limited to around 100,000 points with the 8700K pushing the best graphics numbers as well as the best CPU scores. Because this benchmark is aimed at tablets, mobile phones and notebook integrated graphics, I think that's the reason for the limitation, although with one exception I'd expect the CPU test to run better because the frame rate is so low and it looks very similar to the other CPU tests of Firestrike & Timespy. I think the limitations we're seeing in the Graphics Tests is more expected though, due to the very high frame rates seen there, becoming platform limited there - I don't say CPU limited because during those graphics tests no single core was close to being maxed out.
#5594134
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196426.jpg
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/29216931? My CPU unfortunately isn't very good for gaming, it's a Broadwell-E which clocks only 4.0-4.1 before running into heat and voltage problems. So score is somewhat low for a GTX1080 overclocked to nearly 2.1 Ghz: 41139 🙁
#5594296
data/avatar/default/avatar05.webp
Runs like crap on AMD hardware i have vega lc at 50% power target and 1120 hbm2 and RYZEN 1800X at 4.0 ghz CPU Score 10 522 Vega 64 LC : 50% power target and 1120mhz HBM2 = Graphics Score 84 448 https://www.3dmark.com/nr/4213
#5594478
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
Hulk12:

Hi, friend! 😀 I can beat you but... CPU scores only. 😛 My same CPU@4.7GHz and my EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC+@all stock speeds running W10 1809 (october 2018). 🙂 https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/29241292 - GeForce v416.16 driver with all default settings except high quality,
Well I had 4.6Ghz 😉
#5594501
data/avatar/default/avatar07.webp
-Tj-:

Well I had 4.6Ghz 😉
oh! yeah. If I would be to run at 4.6 GHz, I would get sadly 8300. why can you not get always 4.7GHz?
#5594556
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/96/96525.jpg
Anyone else with the advanced version not able to do custom on this bench? Says u have to have it and I do own it, but will not let me change anything...?o_O
#5594560
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/96/96525.jpg
chinobino:

6700K with DDR3 + 980Ti https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/29249828 Can't seem to run it on my 4K TV on my HTPC, what res does this test run at? 1080p?
I believe by default it runs 1080. Have to get into the custom settings to change it, which I can't. Tho it says I own the advanced version... Someone correct me if I'm wrong....

Next Page