Cyberpunk 2077: PC graphics perf benchmark review

Game reviews 127 Page 1 of 1 Published by

Click here to post a comment for Cyberpunk 2077: PC graphics perf benchmark review on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
Undying:

You want those 8c/16t cpus for this game.
hoping my setup can do consistent 50,all I'm asking for I mean min. of 50 wish there was a 4/8 cpu in the test to compare against 9600k,6c/6t gets absoultely destroyed,10600k has a 1.45x higher min fps just for having ht
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/144/144047.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

what are cascaded shadows ?
it like tries to add some kind of shadow smoothing/aa to shadows,and thats all shadows all around,def hurts fps
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/283/283844.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

okay boomer I don't do reviews blame pcgh for testing cpus in cpu limited scenarios
Great comeback you post 720p benchmarks and call me boomer,lol
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
bobnewels:

Great comeback you post 720p benchmarks and call me boomer,lol
would not make a great standup comedian lol but my point is they chose a cpu limited scenario for a cpu test. what a shocker. must call people fanboys cause when posted it 🙄 this game will expose any cpu that comes short on threads or memory latency,even if you play at 720p you're not getting 60 in that case is that an interpretation you like more ? it's not like you're getting 60 at 1440p when your cpu is good for 45 at 720p. there's just 6% difference between 10400f and 10600k just cause they're running 2666 ram,are you kidding,this is the most interesting cpu bench I've seen in a long while btw does 50 count as boomer ? 😛
data/avatar/default/avatar24.webp
Undying:

You want those 8c/16t cpus for this game.
Indeed, eventhough my very old 4930k (albeit OC'ed) does very well at 60 hz 🙂
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/72/72485.jpg
DannyD:

Sry to hear that JB, i've been loving it and the 'slow pace' at the start suits me as there is so much to take in and i didn't even consider it slow i think it's perfect for me.
I mean I do like it, but like many my hype was through the roof. I don't think anybody could have delivered on the level I was expecting. I'm gonna play it through at least couple times and it will only get better over time with new hardware and software updates so I definitely got my money's worth.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/72/72485.jpg
Fox2232:

Slow != Bad. Like with Raised by Wolves. Quite a few people here wrote that it is bad. And I had low expectations as result. Even postponed watching till there were no good shows around. It is slow paced, but I enjoyed it from 1st moment.
Its not the pace that's bothering me, its the user interface. Those brain dance sequences frustrated the hell out of me. I'm gonna try my hardest just to stick with melee and gun combat.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/165/165018.jpg
DannyD:

Nice one, if i run into trouble further in i'll take a look at the Cascaded Shadows Resolution. 🙂
my laptop with a 4GB 1050Ti can get "almost" 60 FPS at 720P res and EVERYTHING off or on low. Looks like poo but it's playable.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/72/72485.jpg
Undying:

You want those 8c/16t cpus for this game.
No, this game is like RDR2, its almost entirely GPU dependent.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
Kool64:

my laptop with a 4GB 1050Ti can get "almost" 60 FPS at 720P res and EVERYTHING off or on low. Looks like poo but it's playable.
ps4 owners are jealous
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
jbscotchman:

No, this game is like RDR2, its almost entirely GPU dependent.
there is some very high cpu usage from what i've seen.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115462.jpg
Well, I'm still playing this on a 1080Ti @3440x1440, mix of low/medium/high ~45 avg FPS with g-sync. I admit it's a bit of a stretch, but given the 3000 series situation, I'll have to put up with it for my first playthrough. Good thing the game is very slow pace so it's playable even with lower FPS. The game itself so far is awesome though, so multiple playthroughs over the next year will happen for sure. Can't wait to enjoy it cranked up after I finally get my hands on a 3000 card...
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/283/283844.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

would not make a great standup comedian lol but my point is they chose a cpu limited scenario for a cpu test. what a shocker. must call people fanboys cause when posted it 🙄 this game will expose any cpu that comes short on threads or memory latency,even if you play at 720p you're not getting 60 in that case is that an interpretation you like more ? it's not like you're getting 60 at 1440p when your cpu is good for 45 at 720p. there's just 6% difference between 10400f and 10600k just cause they're running 2666 ram,are you kidding,this is the most interesting cpu bench I've seen in a long while btw does 50 count as boomer ? 😛
I have no clue what age a boomer is,you comedic skills aint that bad. I can say the Cyber punk 2077 has not drawn me in yet. Need more time to get hooked, performance is acceptable for me . The bugs are immersion breaking.Especially shadows from people freezing or none at all. The game looks stunning at times.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
Solfaur:

Well, I'm still playing this on a 1080Ti @3440x1440, mix of low/medium/high ~45 avg FPS with g-sync. I admit it's a bit of a stretch, but given the 3000 series situation, I'll have to put up with it for my first playthrough. Good thing the game is very slow pace so it's playable even with lower FPS. The game itself so far is awesome though, so multiple playthroughs over the next year will happen for sure. Can't wait to enjoy it cranked up after I finally get my hands on a 3000 card...
I'm saving this until I can play it properly,with rt
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/72/72485.jpg
Undying:

there is some very high cpu usage from what i've seen.
Not from what I've seen.
cyberpunkcpu.jpg
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
bobnewels:

I have no clue what age a boomer is,you comedic skills aint that bad. I can say the Cyber punk 2077 has not drawn me in yet. Need more time to get hooked, performance is acceptable for me . The bugs are immersion breaking.Especially shadows from people freezing or none at all. The game looks stunning at times.
witcher 3 was a bugfest and a performance drag at first too waiting for goty and expansions,bug and perf fixes,rtx cards. still,day one perf review is an interesting read
Undying:

there is some very high cpu usage from what i've seen.
from what I can gather from reviews and opinions the game is so taxing on the gpu most people won't get to see how much cpu power it takes it run it at constant,let's say,70 fps
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/263/263710.jpg
* TURN THE BASS AND TREBLE @ MAXIMUM......WHILE READING THE REVIEW ONE MORE TIME.... [youtube=CHENRaquRHo]
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/165/165018.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

ps4 owners are jealous
Yeah I can't imagine playing it on the first gen PS4 or the Xbone. I mean I might be able to up the res 10 1080P if I cut my FPS expectations down to 30 but I'm far too much of a PC elitist to accept 30FPS in a game like this. So I'll take "looks like poo" over lower FPS with better graphics.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/72/72485.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

witcher 3 was a bugfest and a performance drag at first too waiting for goty and expansions,bug and perf fixes,rtx cards. still,day one perf review is an interesting read
Now this I have to respectfully address I think we can all agree that Witcher 1 was a disaster at launch. I mean up to a minute loading time just going inside a building, but it was fixed with the Enhanced Edition free of charge. The Witcher 2 and 3 imo were flawless, I didn't have any issues with them at launch. Cyberpunk feels like Witcher 1, it needs a lot more polishing and I kinda wonder what the hell they've been doing for the last year that resulted in the delays.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/134/134194.jpg
HH nice review I Hope DLSS is added to this review as it is a key hardware feature for NVidia hardware, I don't agree with apples to apples comparisons as NVidia is an Orange and Amd is a Pear different hardware different drivers they even do what they do in a different way. I bought a NVidia GPU as it had DLSS that would improve performance when the GPU needs a boost and cyberpunk 2077 needs a boost.