Core i5 3570K processor review

Processors 199 Page 1 of 1 Published by

Click here to post a comment for Core i5 3570K processor review on our message forum
#4522250
data/avatar/default/avatar30.webp
I need help, cause i'm starting to freak out. It seems like i can't set the turbo multiplier more than 42. I mean, i can in the bios, but when i go to the desktop and check cpu-z, it always says 4200.00 Mhz, even if i set it to 44 or 45. What the hell is happening? I tried everything, am i missing something?
#4522253
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/179/179579.jpg
Problem is said games are not threaded properly to leverage the power of the AMD with the new consoles coming out bases on this arctecture it will be interesting to see if the game gap shrinks.
Yes hopefully we'll see more games like BF3 that use all cores...
And I could go on about how my i7 rapes his i5 at everything else :P
Haha well said....
I need help, cause i'm starting to freak out. It seems like i can't set the turbo multiplier more than 42. I mean, i can in the bios, but when i go to the desktop and check cpu-z, it always says 4200.00 Mhz, even if i set it to 44 or 45. What the hell is happening? I tried everything, am i missing something?
If it's anything like AMD CPU's Turbo it doesn't work once you start overclocking.
#4522255
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/179/179579.jpg
ddAsdaddd
#4522266
data/avatar/default/avatar16.webp
1230v2 Xeon (no igpu at all) is almost identical with i7-3770 , with i5 3570k price. Some mobos allow "overclocking" by changing the multiplier to 37 and no need for 140 euro mobo + 60 euro OC cooler. B75 mobo and some cheap aftermarket cooler for less noise will do just fine!
Thx for info... I knew there must be Xeon like that one. But it doesn't look so hot according to hwbot. You win some (hyperthreading), you lose some(MHz) http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_e3_1230_v2/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/core_i5_3570k/
#4522299
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/79/79740.jpg
Quite happy with mine. Does 4.5 @ 1.32v but leave it at 4.2 stock volts. Never intended to get the 3570k, was waiting for Haswell, but last board (P55 Gigabyte) developed sata controller issues, so this was more a replacement of old board/CPU. Not sure I'll go for Haswell now, as I dont think it will do much better on the IPC front. Intel seems more focused on TDP and IGP improvements and of course multi-threaded performance. So gaming-wise I dont think Haswell will do much vs IB.
#4522321
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196284.jpg
If it's anything like AMD CPU's Turbo it doesn't work once you start overclocking.
Nope...not the case with Intel. Unless you disable Turbo Boost....changing the multiplier changes the Turbo Boost frequency.
#4522327
data/avatar/default/avatar18.webp
I figured it out. Somehow the Asus AI Suite is tied with the bios and it didn't let me change the multiplier. It seems like every time i set it to 45 in the bios, the Ai Suite reset it once i boot. I uninstalled that crap and i can overclock now.
#4522330
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/227/227042.jpg
Funny how I thought I was stuck at 4.2Ghz (with optimal manual voltage settings) but after reading this excellent re-review, I decided to try 4.4Ghz with auto voltage, and what do you know - it's 100% stable. Temps do not go over 78c on any core with a Cooler Master V8 (ARCTIC MX4 Thermal Paste). Voltage doesn't go past 1.3010 (according to CoreTemp64). Anyways, solid review, for a solid CPU!
#4522332
data/avatar/default/avatar02.webp
Funny how I thought I was stuck at 4.2Ghz (with optimal manual voltage settings) but after reading this excellent re-review, I decided to try 4.4Ghz with auto voltage, and what do you know - it's 100% stable. Temps do not go over 78c on any core with a Cooler Master V8 (ARCTIC MX4 Thermal Paste). Voltage doesn't go past 1.3010 (according to CoreTemp64). Anyways, solid review, for a solid CPU!
1.3v for a 4.4Ghz is just too much. You should go for 4.5/4.6Ghz with that voltage.
#4522495
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/93/93080.jpg
Funny how I thought I was stuck at 4.2Ghz (with optimal manual voltage settings) but after reading this excellent re-review, I decided to try 4.4Ghz with auto voltage, and what do you know - it's 100% stable. Temps do not go over 78c on any core with a Cooler Master V8 (ARCTIC MX4 Thermal Paste). Voltage doesn't go past 1.3010 (according to CoreTemp64). Anyways, solid review, for a solid CPU!
Hmmm interesting. I have an i7 3770k at 4.6 Ghz, and it never goes above 65C on a Cooler Master V6 GT. I use arctic silver 5 still, even though MX is supposed to be better. I'd think the i7 3750k would run cooler since it doesn't have HT? I know the V6 GT is a bit faster RPM maybe that is why. I use auto on my voltages as well, and its rock solid.
#4522552
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/178/178506.jpg
Hmmm interesting. I have an i7 3770k at 4.6 Ghz, and it never goes above 65C on a Cooler Master V6 GT. I use arctic silver 5 still, even though MX is supposed to be better. I'd think the i7 3750k would run cooler since it doesn't have HT? I know the V6 GT is a bit faster RPM maybe that is why. I use auto on my voltages as well, and its rock solid.
You could most certainly get your VCore down by manual overclocking. What's your auto voltage at that clock?
#4522656
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
Guys is it a known "fact" or just hearsay that SB clocks+300Mhz(+/-) equals to IB performance?E.g SB@4.8=IB@4.5? Also Hilbert, I have always wondered and never got the chance to ask you or someone that knows this. Are the Intel CPU's(mainly interested in the 2600k) tested with the Turbo on or with fixed clocks? E.g The 2600k was fixed at 3,4 or you had the Turbo on(3.8-3.9Ghz)? Asking just to see how my NON-K 2600 fares against the OC'ed 3570k. Thank you.
#4522745
data/avatar/default/avatar30.webp
Very happy with mine. 4.7ghz @ 1.26v. Max temps between 63-65c only under heavy stress testing.
#4523195
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/72/72830.jpg
The temperature increase is simply not acceptable for such high-end CPU:s. Intel should be ashamed of themselves for allowing this to happen.
#4523288
data/avatar/default/avatar34.webp
Typo in article From Page 2. It says "Core i7 3570K" "Intel released the 3rd generation Core i3/i5/i7 processor family. Though this review is all about the the Core i7 3570K processors, below you can see a small overview for desktop processors."
#4523438
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
Guys is it a known "fact" or just hearsay that SB clocks+300Mhz(+/-) equals to IB performance?E.g SB@4.8=IB@4.5? Also Hilbert, I have always wondered and never got the chance to ask you or someone that knows this. Are the Intel CPU's(mainly interested in the 2600k) tested with the Turbo on or with fixed clocks? E.g The 2600k was fixed at 3,4 or you had the Turbo on(3.8-3.9Ghz)? Asking just to see how my NON-K 2600 fares against the OC'ed 3570k. Thank you.
Sorry guys for bumping this, but I need to know.. 😉
#4523440
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/224/224952.jpg
Sorry guys for bumping this, but I need to know.. 😉
It cant possibly be true, the performance difference will be a ratio, not an offset.
#4523502
data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp
Thanks that was a rather good read and puts me at ease for my future upgrade path!

Previous Page

Next Page