Competition mentions Ryzen 7 3700X & Ryzen 5 3600X - Guess the Cinebench Score
Click here to post a comment for Competition mentions Ryzen 7 3700X & Ryzen 5 3600X - Guess the Cinebench Score on our message forum
HWgeek
At least this confirmed the naming-right?
I Say:
3520 points for 3700X! (~x1.35 over 2920X).
2080 points for 3600X!.
Jagman
Maybe, remember that pinch of salt though 😉
Silva
This is awkward alright! ahah
Evildead666
Could be they are going to punish the 9900K ?
edit : i'd double the 2700X score, and add a bit.
Jayp
Well I still have an issue with the 3700X being a 12 core rumor. It just doesn't make sense from a business perspective at all for AMD. The 2700X already dominates the price point for multi threaded work loads. An increase to clock speed, cache and memory performance and a little bit of overall IPC would be all AMD would need to really hold down the $329 8 core price point. So let's say the 3700X is still an 8 core I would think it could achieve 2000-2100 CB score stock based on what I think that processor will be. I don't doubt the 12 and maybe 16 cores will come to the platform but the pricing of that table the other day seem broken. Even if a 12 core came for $500 with those new clocks and architecture improvements it would dominate let alone for $299 lol. All I can say is that if AMD launches 12 and 16 core processors that can overclock near 5 Ghz for $500 or less I will buy at launch and never look back. That table definitely doesn't leave room for year over year improvements everyone likes to see. You could buy a 16 core AMD and use it for a very long time lol. Shit I was super tempted to buy 1950x during black friday for $450 but I just don't need that platform. Zen 2 could be used in my highend gaming machine very nicely 🙂
Jayp
Evildead666
Jayp
Evildead666
schmidtbag
MrBonk
Oh man, and I finally just caved on bought a 2600x on sale for 170$ a week ago or so. If the IPC improvements are significant...oh well it's not like it won't be BC and not like the 2600x isn't a significantly large upgrade over my 8 year old i7-950 that I paid almost 300$ for back then right? With Performance Test 8 my i7 950 scores almost exactly 1/2 overall as the average score for the 2600x. (And 2000 points higher than the average 950 score for whatever reason)
:p Now if only AMD's GPUs had the level of Anti Aliasing support Nvidia GPUs did and I would never look back.
Webhiker
Personally I'm hoping the new design with a 14nm I/O chip is true. It could have the potential to be a game changer.
Two 4 core dies with 1 die running 5 GHz and when all dies are in use 4.5 GHz. Or two 6 core dies with 1 die running 5 GHz and so on.
The 64 Epyc has shown how easily AMD can add cores when needed and if the rumors are true with the new 14 nm I/O chip, it will
only become more rewarding to add cores and very easy for AMD to respond to whatever Intel comes up with.
Kaerar
Jayp
Jayp
Jayp
Venix
alxtorrentazos
2019 is going to be exciting........Jim Keller vs. Jim Keller 😉
Borys
ZEN3 7nm 5.0Ghz (all cores) + DDR4 4.000mhz = RIP Intel
JamesSneed
Since AMD went with 8-core CCX's and are getting around 50% better thermals from 7nm I expect to see 16-core mainstream parts. I do wonder if AMD will segment the motherboard lineup for anything over 8 cores as power delivery is going to be an issue on most existing AM4 motherboards.